$WLD wld TP max cuan🐳

Channel
Kianix Capital
@kianixcrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,767subscribers
-182 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001665838889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kianixcrypto |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kianixcrypto |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 6,767 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 6,768 | -31 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 6,799 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 6,817 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 6,821 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 6,837 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 6,857 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 6,869 | -22 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 6,891 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 6,911 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 6,927 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 6,944 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 6,949 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 6,949 | first reading |
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 102 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 44 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 87.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 6.90% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 5.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
pagi
masih belum dikatakan break swing high 67k sekarang masih bg ken katakan penyapuan liqudity konfirmasi pembalikan trend ditentukan besok pagi yes
kita mengikuti aliran uang yang masuk dibtc bukan tebak menebak ya guys, tetap sabar menunggu next movenya
🔥4
news malam ini fmoc dan trump speak di jam 1.30 malam
🔥1
$BTC btc kenaikan dengan candle engulfing sangat besar volume buyer mendorong btc sampai ke harga 70.400 plan kita memang btc naik sapu liquidity 66-67 dan diluar ekspetasi btc bisa sampai 70k bg ken tunggu closingan daily di 67k dengan candle penutup baru konfirmasi btc otw 72k
$BOME setidaknya bome kita tp max guys
🫡1
$BTC tiang gini
bome running terbangkan bome
$AAVE tp max 🐳🐳 ijo ijo propit
Sticker, posted without a caption
btc mau setup buy didemand pertama enggak? highrisk tapi bisa dijebol
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @kianixcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
btc bottom harga berapa?
- range 40k34%
- range 50k69%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
bias kalian untuk btc apa ni
- bullish, masih naik48%
- bearish turun jebol support43%
- netral10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
kira kira btc penurunanya kenapa ini?
- turun untuk naik26%
- sudah retest naik, dan sekarang kejar 60 bawah63%
- netral11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vip_whalaces · 37,480
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@tkcryptochannel · 22,237
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
@Trading_Camp · 39,549
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@cryptocium · 74,321
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@BillionaireTrader99 · 33,667
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@saillytradinggroup · 43,123
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@ASTrading77 · 40,028
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@openkerja · 260,274
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
@Markas_Trader · 31,704
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
@binance_liquidations01 · 51,768
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
@diginvestid · 38,785
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,558
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@harmonicshark · 53,790
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
@kjoacademy · 28,789
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
@indocukong · 41,283
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@WhaleDV · 28,780
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@Official_GCR · 53,205
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@tumbuhkayasaham · 98,068
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@CryptoPhoennix · 27,014
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
@kenwilboyfx · 78,359
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@kaptencrypto707 · 93,064
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kianix Capital” (@kianixcrypto), 6,767 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kianixcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.