Channel
@saillytradinggroup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,157subscribers
-1,706 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001552974299 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saillytradinggroup |
| Description | Contact Admin: https://t.me/saillyadmin Selain Contact Di Atas, Sudah Bisa Dipastikan Bukan Admin Melainkan Penipu ya!! Harap Untuk Lebih Bijak Dan Hati-Hati |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saillytradinggroup |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:45 | 42,157 | -33 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 42,190 | -28 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:45 | 42,218 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:18 | 42,231 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 42,239 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:34 | 42,257 | -22 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:31 | 42,279 | -33 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 42,312 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 42,326 | -28 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 42,354 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:48 | 42,381 | -20 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 42,401 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 42,413 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 42,425 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 42,442 | -30 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 42,472 | -27 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 42,499 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:31 | 42,516 | -13 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 42,529 | -14 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 42,543 | first reading |
308 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 87 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 308 (1 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 271,007 |
| Reactions total | 1,143 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,672 reactions across 304 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,578 | 33.8% | |
| 🐳 | 959 | 20.5% | |
| 👍 | 804 | 17.2% | |
| 🔥 | 511 | 10.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 180 | 3.85% | |
| 😁 | 176 | 3.77% | |
| 👌 | 135 | 2.89% | |
| 👀 | 94 | 2.01% | |
| 👏 | 41 | 0.878% | |
| 🤯 | 40 | 0.856% | |
| 🤔 | 34 | 0.728% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 0.664% | |
| 😱 | 27 | 0.578% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 0.535% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 0.492% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 0.235% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.043% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.021% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 308 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,672 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| entifikasi | 1 | 5 October 2026 | 5 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 308 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Binance melaporkan kemajuan besar dalam upaya pemulihannya setelah kejadian penyerangan terbesar dalam sejarah. Exchange Crypto tersebut mengatakan bahwa pemulihan peretasan telah mencapai sekitar 98% dari nilai aset pengguna yang terdampak setelah peretasan senilai $6,3 miliar. Exchange tersebut juga membuka kembali penarikan untuk 62 token dan memperluas cakupan Proof-of-Reserves (PoR) tanpa pengetahuan (zero-knowl…
❤2
(Lanjutan) Binance menyampaikan bahwa prioritas aset ditentukan berdasarkan permintaan pengguna selama sepekan terakhir, dengan setiap pasangan penarikan harus melalui pemeriksaan keamanan dan kesiapan terlebih dahulu. Pihak Exchange juga mengingatkan bahwa beberapa token mungkin tidak langsung tersedia, dan tingginya lalu lintas transaksi dapat menyebabkan keterlambatan dalam pemrosesan.
Bank of England (Bank Sentral Inggris) telah menaikkan suku bunga untuk pertama kalinya dalam lebih dari tiga tahun sebagai upaya untuk meredam kenaikan harga. Suku bunga naik menjadi 4% dari sebelumnya 3,75%, sebuah keputusan yang telah diperkirakan secara luas, di tengah lonjakan harga bensin dan diesel yang memicu inflasi. Andrew Bailey, gubernur bank sentral tersebut, mengatakan bahwa keputusan ini "seharusnya t…
❤6
Korea Selatan akan menunda penerapan pajak atas keuntungan Crypto untuk keempat kalinya, sehingga pelaksanaannya diundur hingga tahun 2029. Pajak tersebut sedianya dijadwalkan mulai berlaku pada Januari 2027. Keputusan ini sangat kontras dengan langkah Hong Kong, yang pada hari Rabu telah mengesahkan undang-undang mengenai pelaporan pajak Crypto. Para pejabat menyebutkan beberapa alasan. Pertama, Amerika Serikat bar…
🐳1
Bank investasi Morgan Stanley telah bergerak cepat untuk melakukan tokenisasi terhadap saham-saham AS, menyusul peluncuran infrastruktur tokenisasi baru di Wall Street. Morgan Stanley menjadi salah satu bank pertama yang memanfaatkan infrastruktur tokenisasi baru dari Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation untuk melakukan tokenisasi terhadap saham-saham AS yang populer. Melalui media sosial, Morgan Stanley menyatak…
❤2🐳2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
Semoga tidak ada lagi MANTA MANTA MANTAP yang berubah jadi MANTAPPU DJIWA BONCOSNYA...
❤13😁5🐳2👍2
https://x.com/KevinSailly_/status/2118012368752177435?a=AKhpbPtjBDSEqVGbXHw&s=20 Saya terkejut karena pernyataannya Heaventrade kayak gini.. Tapi sudah saya luruskan yah.. Mohon di bantu oleh kawan-kawan yang paham niat baik saya, saya juga tidak ada kepikiran untuk menjerumuskan apalagi memberikan rekomendasi nyata untuk melakukan transaksi yang secara risiko bisa tinggi sekali dan tidak semua paham risikonya.. …
❤14👌4❤🔥1🐳1
Baru juga beres pemilu..
👀20😱3🐳1
(Lanjutan) “Peretasan dalam skala sebesar ini menandakan adanya kegagalan keamanan yang serius. Tidak ada platform yang kebal dari peretasan, namun hal itu tidak bisa dijadikan alasan. Setiap insiden mengungkap kelemahan yang seharusnya bisa dicegah,” tulis CZ dalam unggahan terbarunya di X. “Beberapa detailnya sungguh memalukan. Penjelasan yang disampaikan kepada publik juga terkesan menyederhanakan apa yang tampa…
👍3🐳2❤1
Changpeng Zhao belum lama ini memperingatkan bahwa kecerdasan buatan (AI) dapat memicu gelombang baru serangan siber terhadap Exchange Crypto dan bank, hanya beberapa hari setelah pencurian terbesar dalam sejarah Crypto terjadi. Perlu diketahui, Pada 29 Oktober, peretas menguras sekitar $6,34 miliar dari Binance dalam waktu kurang lebih 20 menit, dengan $2,85 miliar di antaranya berhasil dibekukan atau dicegat. FBI m…
🐳4
🚨 Hack $6,3 Miliar Minggu Lalu — Apa Pelajarannya Buat Kita? Minggu lalu salah satu exchange terbesar dunia kena exploit sekitar $6,3 miliar, tercatat sebagai pencurian kripto terbesar sepanjang sejarah. Yang perlu kalian tahu: • Dana keluar dari wallet exchange di ~10 blockchain, mayoritas dalam ±20 menit • Sekitar $3 miliar berhasil dibekukan dengan bantuan industri • FBI mengaitkan serangan ini dengan hacker Kor…
👍9❤7🐳2💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 308 posts we hold for @saillytradinggroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@saillytradinggroup edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sailly's Trading Group” (@saillytradinggroup), 42,157 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saillytradinggroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.