https://youtu.be/RqGFJJiBrz4?si=YyKGVxLzKj8SJA9N
🔥19👏6❤5

Channel
@kjoacademy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,789subscribers
-158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001372961473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kjoacademy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kjoacademy |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 28,789 | -25 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 28,814 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 28,828 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 28,841 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 28,858 | +155 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 28,703 | +117 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 28,586 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 28,599 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:08 | 28,619 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:05 | 28,624 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 28,635 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 28,653 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 28,658 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 28,674 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 28,691 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 28,703 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 28,721 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 28,738 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 28,761 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 28,774 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (17 July 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 109,260 |
| Reactions total | 1,748 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,485 reactions across 50 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,045 | 45.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,361 | 30.3% | |
| 👍 | 231 | 5.15% | |
| 👏 | 195 | 4.35% | |
| 🙏 | 141 | 3.14% | |
| 🤯 | 117 | 2.61% | |
| 🎉 | 109 | 2.43% | |
| 🤩 | 95 | 2.12% | |
| 👌 | 76 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 74 | 1.65% | |
| 🏆 | 39 | 0.87% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.045% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/RqGFJJiBrz4?si=YyKGVxLzKj8SJA9N
🔥19👏6❤5
Dapatkan outlook dan signal tiap hari by kjo disini https://kjoacademy.com
❤32🔥8🤯4🎉3
Sedikit penjelasin apa yang terjadi semalam dan apa itu CLARITY Act yang lagi ramai. CLARITY Act ini pada dasarnya adalah rancangan aturan crypto di Amerika. Tujuannya supaya regulasi crypto lebih jelas, terutama menentukan mana yang menjadi wilayah SEC dan mana yang diatur CFTC, termasuk aturan untuk aset digital dan perusahaan/exchange crypto. Nah, voting kemarin bukan voting final untuk mengesahkan CLARITY Act. …
🔥57❤31👍22🤯5🥰5🙏4👏2🤩1
itu aja ya guys, tidak mencoba menjadi analyst nomor 1 atau menganggap terbaik analisanya. cuma ingin berbagi outlook pribadi gw saja. stay respect dengan analisa-analisa analyst yang lain walaupun berbeda pendapat. thank you
🔥147❤55🙏41👏13🎉1🥰1
ASTER Weekly Ini juga membuat gw sangat tertarik ya. Bukan cuma soal teknikal, tapi fundamentalnya juga. Pertama dari sisi teknikal, kita itu finally breakout Resistance ASTER sejak 2026 awal kita bermain under 0.7x. Finally kita breakout 0.73 sebagai Neckline Cup and Handle dan kepentok di 0.78$ sebagai Resistance ya. Selama ASTER mampu bertahan diatas 0.7$ Weekly Candlestick, kita harusnya cukup positif bisa ke…
❤119🔥21🙏15🏆3👏3🤩2🥰2🎉1
BTC Daily BTC Daily sekarang lagi forming Ascending Channel dan tertahan di Support Trendline + Fibbo 0.618 di angka 78.000-78.200$ Semoga ga jebol ya, kalau jebol intinya harus tertahan di 76.000 karena ada Demand besar disana yang kalau emang turun, expecting hanya wick saja. Dan Resistance BTC terdekat ada di range 79.000$ jika ingin lanjut naik ke area 82.000$ sebagai Resistance Ascanding Channel ini
❤62🥰22🔥15👏1
Golden Cross terjadi saat EMA 50 menembus EMA 200 ke atas. Ini dianggap penting karena menunjukkan tren harga jangka menengah mulai lebih kuat daripada tren jangka panjang, sehingga sering dibaca sebagai konfirmasi market mulai bullish. Tapi tetap bukan jaminan harga pasti naik, karena Golden Cross adalah indikator konfirmasi, bukan prediksi.
❤58🔥6🥰6🎉1👏1
BTC Daily BTC terlihat berada di range Resistance grey area dimana area tersebut berada di 77.400-82.200$ Dan saat ini Support BTC berada di 77.400$ secara Daily ya. Ga boleh closing dibawah itu, karena kalau jebol dan closing dibawah 77.000$ ini bisa lanjut ke 74.000$ karena jadinya confirm Double Top. Tapi disini kita bisa lihat ya, kita ALMOST Golden Cross antara EMA200 dan EMA50, dan ini mungkin akan terjadi d…
❤58🔥9👌7🤩3
BTC Double Bottom Potential Kenapa gw bilang BTC harus mampu bertahan diatas 76.000-77.600$?? Karena Bullish Structure yang kita dapatkan juga bahwa BTC sudah breakout dari Downtrend Channelnya. BTC sudah breakout Resistance dan Retrace di Neckline dari Double Bottomnya. So, jika BTC mau mengaja momentum ini. Kita harus bertahan dan 1x lagi tiang. 1x Swing Resistance ada di area 93.400$ ya, dimana itu Resistance …
❤51🔥13🎉10
BTC Weekly IHNS POV Potential BTC Weekly memang terlihat ada potential IHNS JIKA jebol Support di area 76.000$ Dimana range Right Shouldernya di area 69.000-72.000$, untuk bisa ke area ini, BTC harus ada Impulsive Bad News ya. Karena mencapai area ini, akan mengganggu proses dari Bullish Market Structurenya yang bisa jebol Uptrend Structurenya. Jadi 76.000-77.000$ expecting Support kuat saat ini yang harus dijaga.…
❤51🤩7🔥5🤯1
BTC Weekly Coba kita lihat bersama ya, BTC Weekly dengan EMA200 dan EMA50. BTC dulu 2023 di kiri, jebol EMA50 putih dan Bear Market panjang selama bermain EMA50 garis putih. Tapi after BTC breakout EMA200 garis kuning, BTC selalu cenderung bermain garis kuning, even dia ngejar EMA50 garis putih, dia closing di garis kuning. Artinya, BTC harus menjaga momentumnya diatas garis kuning. Karena dengan breakout garis ku…
❤54🔥13🙏6🤩1🤯1
BTC Monthly BTC secara Monthly terlihat ada Support di 76.400 yang tidak boleh di breakdown ya. Karena itu Support Monthlynya yang tidak boleh closing dibawah itu secara Monthly Closing. Resistance saat ini masih berada di 82.600. So far, EMA7 garis kuning dan EMA25 garis putih sudah di breakout yang sebelumnya menjadi Resistance BTC ya, dan sekarang become Support di range 74.300-77.100$. Area ini sebaiknya dapat…
❤63🙏9🔥6🤯1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @kjoacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KJo Academy FREE Crypto Channel” (@kjoacademy), 28,789 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kjoacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.