WHALE 0xC374 KEMBALI MEMBORONG UNI! 🐋 - Pembelian terbaru: 308.517 UNI. - Nilai pembelian: US$2,13 juta. - Akumulasi 45 hari: 1,32 juta UNI. - Total nilai akumulasi: US$11,05 juta. - Harga UNI: US$6,98.

Channel
Signal Crypto AyoungLam ( SCAL )
@tradeallcoin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,613subscribers
-853 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001074706105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tradeallcoin |
| Created | Between 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tradeallcoin |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:41 | 19,613 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 19,618 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:30 | 19,629 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:08 | 19,638 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 19,642 | -2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 19,644 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:54 | 19,648 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:16 | 19,656 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 19,661 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:28 | 19,668 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 19,679 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 19,688 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 19,693 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 19,708 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 19,713 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 19,717 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 19,727 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:12 | 19,742 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 19,748 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:10 | 19,757 | first reading |
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.69%
- avg views ÷ 19,613 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,120
- 32 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 32
- of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 35,685 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 15:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.719%
- 1 of 139 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,230
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 1,110
- over 138 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| entifikasi | 1 | 30 October 2026 | 30 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
USDC Kini Hadir di Samsung Wallet! Menampilkan integrasi USDC, Samsung Wallet, jaringan Solana, jangkauan 60+ negara, dan potensi 82 juta perangkat Galaxy kompatibel di AS.
📉 LIKUIDASI TRADER CRYPTO — 6 NOVEMBER 2026 Dengan kurs $1 = Rp18.100, total likuidasi 24 jam berdasarkan gambar adalah sekitar Rp22,63 triliun Rinciannya: - Total 24 jam: $1,25 miliar. - LONG: $1,11 miliar ≈ Rp20,09 triliun. - SHORT: $141,92 juta ≈ Rp2,57 triliun. - Trader terdampak: 237.692 orang.
YES ! ibarat Trading gaya main Mobile Legend Yang di Tradekan duluan adalah di market SPOT Ketika Floating -10% baru masuk lagi , Ini Strategi BackTest Terbaik selama karir saya sebagai Trade mulai dari 2018 s/d sekarang !
Prediksi Tepat 😭🎆 Saham global terjun 🔥
⚠️ MARKET WARNING: EUROPEAN STOCKS Saham-saham Eropa sebaiknya diwaspadai dan hindari mengambil posisi terlalu agresif untuk sementara waktu. Ada potensi tekanan besar atau crash pada periode 5–7 November 2026. Tetap perhatikan volatilitas pasar, jaga likuiditas, dan jangan FOMO. ✍️ Menurut pandangan pribadi. #DYOR #EuropeanStocks #StockMarket #MarketCrash #TradingAlert Catatan: Ini merupakan opini atau skenario…
Area BTC Skenario $79.000 Area tekanan harga $77.850 Level referensi $76.100–$75.700 Support utama $77.200–$77.600 Potensi rebound ⚠️ Perhatian khusus: 7 November 2026 Kesimpulan: Jangan terlalu agresif ketika market sedang tidak bersahabat. Prioritaskan menjaga modal dan mengendalikan floating.
Beda Bot Infinity dengan Trade ManuaL ⁉️ Era Zaman makin Canggih , kita juga butuh BOT Pintar AI Seperti BOT infinity ( masing2 contoh diatas adalah SPOT Market ) 💫
Circle Laporkan Kinerja Keuangan Kuartal III 2026: Pendapatan Naik 17% Menjadi US$865 Juta, Rata-Rata Peredaran USDC Mencapai US$73,3 Miliar Circle mengungkapkan bahwa pendapatan dan pendapatan dari cadangan (reserve income) pada kuartal ketiga 2026 meningkat 17% secara tahunan (YoY) menjadi US$865 juta. Sementara itu, laba bersih dari operasi yang berkelanjutan naik 5% menjadi US$226 juta. Pendapatan lainnya terma…
😏 Rates are going up, and the USDC boss is smirking A December hike is priced at >80%. Everyone's worried about mortgages and stocks, but Circle lives on interest from USDC reserves: each quarter-point hike adds about $44M a quarter in reserve income (estimate). I think a hike is actually good news for Circle. What do you think? Earnings Nov 4 pre-market, and the question is whether USDC in circulation gets back to…
🚨 KOREA SELATAN INGIN BURSA CRYPTO SIMPAN 99% ASET DI COLD WALLET! Keamanan aset crypto menjadi perhatian serius setelah insiden peretasan Binance. 🇰🇷 Komisi Jasa Keuangan Korea Selatan (FSC) sedang mempertimbangkan kenaikan persyaratan penyimpanan aset pelanggan di cold wallet dari 80% menjadi sekitar 99%. 📊 Bagaimana kondisi bursa saat ini? Upbit: lebih dari 99% Bithumb: sekitar 94% Coinone: sekitar 85% 💡 Mengapa i…
"Market boleh naik turun, floating boleh berubah, tetapi strategi tetap berjalan. Bukan sekadar mencari profit, melainkan bagaimana bertahan dan konsisten menghadapi market." 🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @tradeallcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tomketloversreborn · 79,198#1
@Trading_Camp · 38,640#2
@DosenCrypto · 8,366#3
@cryptoanalyst_ff · 6,366#4
@xMagicCrypto · 9,329#5
@ruangcrypto_official · 19,086#6
@twisterproscalper · 11,543 (as read 29 September 2026)#7
@cryptomania_id · 3,830#8
@persugihandigital · 9,681#9
@ruangcrypto_2 · 6,226#10
@CCFIndonesianTrader · 3,953#11
@SpinerFMax · 850#12
@mr_bigcuan · 1,458#13
@KaptenCuanCrypto · 11,760#14
@cryptoroket5 · 1,518#15
@Pakgurucrypto · 3,364#16
@FourX_insider · 9,359#17
@polymarketindo · 2,215 (as read 29 September 2026)#18
@elliotwavebasic · 780#19
@hariancoinvestasi · 6,291#20
@reichtumcuan · 5,845#21
@cumatempatreview · 1,853#22
@Plancpremiumsignal · 1,016#23
@indocukong · 40,359#24
@dogs · 6,451,094#25
@kaptencrypto707 · 91,431#26
@airdropfind · 516,100#27
@saillytradinggroup · 42,106#28
@cryptonologyIndo · 17,181#29
@REKTbinance · 19,575#30
@vip_whalaces · 35,524#31
@Markas_Trader · 31,042#32
@simbacryptogrup · 18,512#33
@PustakaCrypto · 4,814#34
@sarjanaairdropcrypto · 7,006#35
@TheCryptoindonesiaTOP · 2,965#36
@thetruthsignal · 8,301#37
@swaincrypto · 8,358#38
@cryptocatcircle · 7,979#39
@BeritaCryptoo · 34,212#40
@asetdingin · 2,358#41
@EmakSignal · 4,335#42
@tradeanytimeid · 6,976#43
@whale_alert_io · 295,924#44
@rektislifereborn · 1,000#45
@cuanversecrypto · 2,391#46
@cryptocoffee08 · 4,683#47
@evolution_trading · 8,967#48
@BCUSAReal · 145,231#49
@kianixcrypto · 6,645#50
@binance_announcements · 3,218,597#51
@scfuturestraders · 9,293#52
@thebull_crypto · 170,883#53
@nutradeofficial · 3,064#54
@Duckmoonhunterr · 2,580 (as read 29 September 2026)#55
@bahascryptobarengrico · 4,882#56
@milyaderboycrypto · 5,940#57
@coin_edu · 1,518#58
@FCJourney · 2,224#59
@AirdropJacks · 25,719#60
@JeremyS300 · 1,004#61
@yourlittlething · 2,492#62
@RuangWEB3 · 3,914#63
@cryptosiastdrops · 30,837#64
@news_crypto · 99,678#65
@ceritacrypto · 3,602#66
@next10xgem1 · 321,650#67
@kingandkongcrypto · 5,752#68
@PegazusEcosystem · 30,715#69
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#70
@whalebotalerts · 142,037#71
@WatcherGuru · 632,041#72
@notcoin · 7,885,777#73
@rose · 85,010#74
@cryptoheistwithab · 1,974#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@indodax · 93,791
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@ruangcrypto_official · 19,086
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
@TokocryptoExchange · 33,809
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@creativetrader · 40,642
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
@opposite6890_xfire · 64,248
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 26 August 2026
@kaptencrypto707 · 91,431
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@Trading_Camp · 38,640
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@REKTbinance · 19,575
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
@indocukong · 40,359
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
@mardiguwp · 64,236
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@ASTrading77 · 39,006
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@saillytradinggroup · 42,106
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@kemenaker1 · 19,579
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 28 September 2026
@WhaleDV · 27,797
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@sarjanacryptoindonesia · 48,362
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
@dailyrekom · 25,706
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@tumbuhkayasaham · 95,415
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@OfficialPluang · 20,641
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
@RoseSignalsPremium · 93,844
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@onepiecnakamaindonesia · 62,971
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 27 August 2026
@kepoocuychannel · 45,000
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 26 August 2026
@rikopedia · 27,258
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@madingloker · 36,662
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 31 August 2026
@CryptoWhaleSignaIs · 33,227
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Signal Crypto AyoungLam ( SCAL )” (@tradeallcoin), 19,613 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradeallcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.