Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rose 🌹

Channel

Rose 🌹

@rose

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

85,716subscribers

-337 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001127985395
TypeChannel
Usernames@cryptorosechannel @rose
DescriptionThere is only one Rose t.me/rose Rose Support Admin: @cookingfood Be aware of Fake Roses/ Imposters ____________ The Collection of Setups from RoseStreet t.me/RoseStreetTradingCollection
Created22 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/rose

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

85,66486,05385,858.56 August 2026 — 86,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 86,042 subscribers8 August 2026 — 86,023 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86,034 subscribers10 August 2026 — 86,051 subscribers11 August 2026 — 86,032 subscribers12 August 2026 — 86,014 subscribers13 August 2026 — 86,001 subscribers14 August 2026 — 85,984 subscribers16 August 2026 — 85,963 subscribers17 August 2026 — 85,916 subscribers18 August 2026 — 85,886 subscribers19 August 2026 — 85,887 subscribers20 August 2026 — 85,885 subscribers21 August 2026 — 85,889 subscribers23 August 2026 — 85,877 subscribers25 August 2026 — 85,863 subscribers25 August 2026 — 85,855 subscribers26 August 2026 — 85,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 85,827 subscribers28 August 2026 — 85,822 subscribers29 August 2026 — 85,811 subscribers31 August 2026 — 85,798 subscribers31 August 2026 — 85,778 subscribers1 September 2026 — 85,745 subscribers3 September 2026 — 85,716 subscribers5 September 2026 — 85,664 subscribers8 September 2026 — 85,750 subscribers11 September 2026 — 85,795 subscribers13 September 2026 — 85,777 subscribers14 September 2026 — 85,775 subscribers16 September 2026 — 85,728 subscribers18 September 2026 — 85,706 subscribers2 October 2026 — 85,716 subscribers85,7166 August 20262 October 2026
34 measurements spanning 57 days, net -337. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,606–86,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 11:5985,716+10
18 Sept 2026, 14:2185,706-22
16 Sept 2026, 09:5785,728-47
14 Sept 2026, 17:4185,775-2
13 Sept 2026, 03:3885,777-18
11 Sept 2026, 03:3985,795+45
8 Sept 2026, 08:0085,750+86
5 Sept 2026, 03:1785,664-52
3 Sept 2026, 06:5985,716-29
1 Sept 2026, 22:3685,745-33
31 Aug 2026, 23:4685,778-20
31 Aug 2026, 00:3585,798-13
29 Aug 2026, 23:4285,811-11
28 Aug 2026, 22:2585,822-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:1785,827-7
26 Aug 2026, 19:3685,834-21
25 Aug 2026, 23:1185,855-8
25 Aug 2026, 01:1485,863-14
23 Aug 2026, 11:5485,877-12
21 Aug 2026, 19:0685,889first reading

Engagement

352 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 85,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
167 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
167
of 352 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held352 (1 August 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total1,760,390
Reactions total10,913
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,060
Videos
≈7
Links
≈27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

19,831 reactions across 352 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19,831100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 352 of the 352 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
497
across the posts below
Posts paid on
189
of 352 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rose. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 352 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC≈9,920 views71 reactions11 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

Buying Bitcoin here is like Buying Bitcoin at Oct 2020.

👍71

5 Oct 2026, 17:08 UTC≈7,950 views73 reactions13 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

The future is bright.

👍73

5 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTC≈10,400 views51 reactions32 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

There is a box #AIN.

👍51

3 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC≈12,000 views87 reactions7 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

#SAND bounced from support 5 years ago.

👍87

3 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTC≈12,000 views101 reactions7 Starsread 6 October 2026

If you missed #ZEC 3x from 500 to 1k5 Don't miss the #BTC run from 80k to 222222 The road will be easy

👍101

3 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC≈12,700 views95 reactions4 Starsread 6 October 2026
Video

Bitcoin Road to 222222

👍95

2 Oct 2026, 15:52 UTC≈13,200 views75 reactions11 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

#CAP Rose triangles.

👍75

2 Oct 2026, 11:20 UTC≈12,600 views69 reactions12 Starsread 6 October 2026
Photo

#UNI up 90% #AAVE up 50%

👍69

1 Oct 2026, 07:14 UTC≈14,500 views84 reactions3 Starsread 6 October 2026
Poll

Which one will bigcap winner in Q4 this year?

  1. NEAR43%
  2. PUMP13%
  3. QNT29%
  4. ZEC14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍84

Showing the 12 most recent of 352 posts we hold for @rose. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 07:14 UTCFinal Results3,020 voters approx.

Which one will bigcap winner in Q4 this year?

  1. NEAR43%
  2. PUMP13%
  3. QNT29%
  4. ZEC14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTCAnonymous Poll2,350 voters approx.

Which will come first ?

  1. BTC 100k$31%
  2. ZEC 1000$42%
  3. HYPE 100$36%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 96,201
#1
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 178,944
#2
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 174,356
#3
Rose Street Trading Collection🌹
@RoseStreetTradingCollection · 10,544
#4
HC CAPITAL | Channel
@HCCapital_Channel · 64,656
#5
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 67,594
#6
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 37,373
#7
Rose VIP Signal 🌹
@RoseVipSignal · 18,603
#8
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 328,103
#9
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 143,357
#10
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 140,405
#11
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 132,043
#12
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 254,112
#13
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 29,088
#14
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,146
#15
Crypto Premium Signal
@CryptoPremiumSignal · 2,760
#16
Crypto Waves
@BinanceWaves · 21,137
#17
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 178,662
#18
Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹
@rosecryptochannelpremium · 14,387
#19
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,537
#20
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 204,878
#21
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 99,114
#22
unfolded.
@unfolded · 117,072
#23
🌷Rose Signal Daily ☘️
@Rosecryptodaily · 3,181
#24
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · 74,343
#25
Rose Premium Signals | Paid
@RosePremiumPaid · 37,763
#26
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,123
#27
Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 22,061
#28
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 190,554
#29
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 54,087
#30
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,873,004
#31
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,853
#32
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 148,805
#33
Trade Coin Underground
@tradecoinundergroundchannel · 71,037
#34
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,425,744
#35
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 299,278
#36
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,170
#37
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 59,151
#38
HC Tradecoin | Channel
@hctradecoin_channel · 34,481
#39
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,375,891
#40
News Center
@NewsCenterChannel · 37,405
#41
Binance liquidations
@REKTbinance · 19,887
#42
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 143,783
#43
Margin Broadcast | TradeCoinVN
@margintradingTCVN · 54,890
#44
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 311,984
#45
Rich Kid Trading
@Richkidtradings · 98,132
#46
Channel Phố Tài Chính
@FinancialStreetVN · 44,744
#47
Whale Sniper
@WhaleSniper · 59,966
#48
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 337,483
#49
Insights
@HCGemAlerts · 35,277
#50
CCC.io
@cccio · 33,461
#51
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 195,471
#52
Thợ Thầy Onchain
@Thothayonchain · 9,244
#53
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 72,859
#54
52Hz Database
@Database52Hz · 8,396
#55
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 321,690
#56
Mitoo Trading
@mitootrading · 7,642
#57
Lucky Trade Com
@LKS02community · 9,334
#58
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,790
#59
DEFI Scam Check
@Defiscamcheck · 48,444
#60
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 168,100
#61
CryptoQuant Alert
@cryptoquant_alert · 70,730
#62
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 100,077
#63
Saigontradecoin Channel
@saigontradecoinchann · 11,710
#64
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 93,427
#65
001k.Trade
@trade001k · 106,595
#66
KostyaKudo
@Konstantin_Kudo_Cryptology · 49,270
#67
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,088
#68
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals · 19,282
#69
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,332
#70
Герман на блокчейне 🇪🇹
@blockchaingerman · 32,755
#71
Coach
@coach · 23,103
#72
Forex Tradings
@Forex_Tradings · 19,631
#73
Just Trade It UG Ti Hồng
@AltcoinSignalUG · 10,639
#74
Whale Hunter | CoinTrendz.com
@cointrendz_whalehunter · 24,054
#75
Einstein crypto
@Einstein_crypto · 2,603
#76
Bull Market Maker 🐋
@BullMarketMarker · 24,342 (as read 18 August 2026)
#77
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,039
#78
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceFutures_Liquidations · 14,640
#79
Allinstation | Powered by HC Capital
@Allin_Station · 12,950
#80
ThuanCapital
@ThuanCapital · 89,745
#81
52Hz Onchain
@Onchain52Hz · 10,480
#82
Margin - Future Undergound
@MarginUnderground · 16,353
#83
Trade Coin Chiến Lược
@TradeCoinChienLuoc · 40,801
#84
Crypto Fear & Greed Index
@CryptoFearAndGreedIndex · 22,083
#85
TWH GROUP (Crypto - Fx)
@twhgroup · 10,353
#86
КриптоАтака 24 ⚡️
@cryptoattack24 · 55,810
#87
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,414
#88
LucyUG thông tin tài chính
@LucyZubuUG · 14,218
#89
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 128,988
#90

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 99,114
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 96,201
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
CoinTrendz.com
@cointrendz · 21,152
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 37,373
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 174,356
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 178,944
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
CrypNuevo Official 🔨
@CrypNuevoTATrades · 20,217
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 29,088
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 67,594
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 140,405
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
HexaTrades
@hexatrades · 24,491
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@PremiumRoseSignal · 105,585
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Alpha
@marketsAlpha · 25,199
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 143,357
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Binance liquidations
@REKTbinance · 19,887
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026
Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 22,061
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
SolidTradesz 堅固
@solidtradesz · 25,595
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
CoinCodeCap Classic
@coincodecap · 25,377
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀
@JackDorseyCoins · 22,039
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Crypto Nuclear
@TheCryptoNuclear · 110,742
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
JustTopIco
@JustTopico · 32,858
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 178,662
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Trade & Grow (Crypto) HWP
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,103
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
WhalePump Reborn : Best signals! ( 100% Free )
@WhalePumpsReborn · 39,503
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 139 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rose 🌹” (@rose), 85,716 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rose.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.