This channel aims to provide the most profitable signals about crypto
Join @Whalescryptos chat group
twitter.com/Whalesofcrypto
Do trading and investment at your own risk DYOR We are not responsible for any further loss
DM for VIP group
@Whalescrypto
Created
16 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
86,000 average views per post against 191,060 subscribers — an engagement rate of 45.0%. Across the 1,086 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,003–314,146 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 0.987% and 8.65%, with a median of 3.58%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 September 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Posts measured
44 of 44 published in the window (0 exact, 44 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,785,700
Mature posts only
45.0% over 44 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net -12,938. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189,119–205,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 22:15
191,060
-221
23 Oct 2026, 23:47
191,281
-247
22 Oct 2026, 23:59
191,528
-365
21 Oct 2026, 21:37
191,893
-281
20 Oct 2026, 18:00
192,174
-171
19 Oct 2026, 20:46
192,345
-231
18 Oct 2026, 23:29
192,576
-174
18 Oct 2026, 01:00
192,750
-145
17 Oct 2026, 01:39
192,895
-167
16 Oct 2026, 02:27
193,062
-233
14 Oct 2026, 23:20
193,295
-301
13 Oct 2026, 17:28
193,596
-696
9 Oct 2026, 23:56
194,292
-1,179
5 Oct 2026, 16:16
195,471
-2,339
29 Sept 2026, 23:41
197,810
-2,212
18 Sept 2026, 02:39
200,022
-428
15 Sept 2026, 21:56
200,450
-247
14 Sept 2026, 04:17
200,697
-240
12 Sept 2026, 12:16
200,937
-424
10 Sept 2026, 11:37
201,361
first reading
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 191,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
86,100
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
44
of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
145 (19 July 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
3,786,400
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 03:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,340
Videos
≈86
Links
≈1,660
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#NEAR Long Signal has achieved our 1st Target✅
100% profit in 20x Leverage from average entry and 50% profit in 10x Leverage.
Another Big and Good One for Whales crypto 🐋 family
Longing #NEAR here
Long (10x-20x)
Entry: $5.020
Reason: Chart looks bullish for it. Worth a long for short-mid term quick profits too.
Targets: $5.271, $5.523, $5.774, $6.025, $6.521
Stop-loss: $4.589
Longing #BTC here
Long (20x-40x)
Entry: $82,557
Reason: Chart looks bullish for it. Worth a long for short-mid term quick profits too.
Targets: $85,038, $87,518, $90,816, $93,276, $97,031
Stop-loss: $78,308.7
Shorting #VET Here
Short (5x - 10x)
Entry: $0.006450 - $0.006600
Reason: Chart looks bearish for it. Worth shorting for short term quick profits too. Already broke down the Inverse cup and handle pattern also.
Targets: $0.0063, $0.00614, $0.00602, $0.0059
Stoploss: $0.0067
Bitget is shutting accounts for users in Russia and Belarus, with some told they can't open new trades from today and have until October 21 to withdraw.
Shorting #ICP Here
Short (5x - 10x)
Entry: $2.795 - $2.860
Reason: Chart looks bearish for it. Worth shorting for short term quick profits too. Already broke down the Inverse cup and handle pattern also.
Targets: $2.720, $2.640, $2.580, $2.500, $2.400
Stoploss: $2.920
#YFI Short Signal has achieved our 4th Target.✅✅✅✅
100% profit in 10x Leverage from entry and 50% profit 5x Leverage.
Another Quick and Good One for Whales crypto 🐋 family
Longing #ETH Here
Long (5x - 10x)
Entry: $2418 - $2380
Reason: Chart looks bullish for it. Worth buying for short term quick profits too. Already broke out of the resistance zone also.
Targets: $2480, $2560, $2640, $2720
Stoploss: $2340
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US Core CPI came in at 2.6%, highest level in 3 months
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @Whalesguide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wall Street Crypto Trading @Wallstreetcryptotrader · 94,339 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto Profit Coach™ @cryptoprofitcoach · 26,983 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Forex Tradings @Forex_Tradings · 19,455 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Technical CRYPTO Analyst @TechCryptoAnalyst · 313,963 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Kim & Crypto @kimoncrypto · 36,934 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto Bullet OFFICIAL @cryptobulletofficialTG · 22,619 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
Crypto Insiders Talk @crypto_insiders · 190,524 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official® @wallstreetqueenofficial · 189,072 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
The Crypto Express @thecryptoexpress · 250,140 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ✅ ® @VerifiedCryptoNews · 18,687 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Whale Alerts @Whale_Alerts_io · 29,019 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading @altcoinsignals · 52,280 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Tiger's™ @Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,180 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
CoinTrendz.com @cointrendz · 20,967 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
Crypto Signals @cryptosignals · 19,171 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Coach @coach · 22,936 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹 @RosePremiumm · 141,360 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀 @JackDorseyCoins · 21,866 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Coin Signals @Coin_Signals · 72,115 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Backcom.io Global @BackcomGlobal · 24,897 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Trade & Grow (Crypto) HWP @Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,123 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
Cryptoy ₿ @Cryptoy · 34,470 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Wolf of Trading® @wolfoftrading · 124,419 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 114 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Whales Crypto Guide” (@Whalesguide), 191,060 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whalesguide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.