📈 Simple, clear crypto calls https://t.me/+TqDIcMr8NiRjYTQ1 Next trade inside: https://t.me/+TqDIcMr8NiRjYTQ1

Channel
Binance 360
@binance_360
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
101,829subscribers
-410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001553551852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @binance_360 |
| Description | 👉 𝗩𝗜𝗣 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀: @mtc_support1 🔥 𝗩𝗜𝗣 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 & 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳: @vip_profits 🔰 𝗔𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀: 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻 𝗔 • VIP Binance 360 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻 𝗕 • VIP Binance 360 • MTC & MFG Indicators Channel • SRV & RFD Indicators Channel |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/binance_360 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 101,829 | +45 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 101,784 | +48 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 101,736 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 101,733 | -75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 101,808 | +60 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 101,748 | +12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 101,736 | +64 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 101,672 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 101,670 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 101,696 | +47 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 101,649 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 101,662 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 101,674 | -71 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 101,745 | -21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 101,766 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 101,781 | -43 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 101,824 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 101,826 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 101,842 | -77 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 101,919 | first reading |
Engagement
438 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.01%
- avg views ÷ 101,829 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,040
- 373 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 373
- of 438 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 438 (5 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 762,026 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈23,000
- Videos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🚀 #IOST/USDT Reached 0.00098910 Hope all #Free members enjoyed this signal 🚀🚀 ✅ 381.05% Profit Join VIP: @mtc_support1
💥 Futures (Free Signal) 🔴 SHORT #ZRX/USDT Entry zone : 0.1084 - 0.1053 Take Profits : 0.1047 0.1015 0.0984 0.0952 0.0920 Stop loss :0.112671 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
🚀 Spot clean trade setups early https://t.me/+st878JJMOQpjYmVl 🔰 Exclusive channel: https://t.me/+st878JJMOQpjYmVl
✅ #IOST/USDT at 0.00091640 Great job #Free members, more to come! 🚀 206.04% Profit Join VIP: @mtc_support1
🚨 Trade Alert in 30 Minutes! High-momentum setup — Target move: up to 200% Join for real-time alerts: 👉 Channel 1:https://t.me/+st878JJMOQpjYmVl 👉 Channel 2: https://t.me/+st878JJMOQpjYmVl
🚀 #Free signal alert! #IOST/USDT reached 0.00083880 Profit for all #Free followers ✅ 19.23%
💥 Futures (Free Signal) ✅ Long #IOST/USDT Entry zone : 0.00080694 - 0.00083190 Take Profits : 0.00083601 0.00086085 0.00088568 0.00091051 0.00093534 Stop loss :0.000773667 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
✅ #IOST/USDT at 0.00084330 Great job #Free members, more to come! 🚀 482.37% Profit Join VIP: @mtc_support1
📈 #DOT/USDT ✅464.03% Profit 🔥 High accuracy of MTC Indicator ✔️ Which channel gives you such accurate signals? Don't miss our VIP signals ⭐ VIP results : @vip_profits ⭐ Join VIP : @mtc_support1
#DOT/USDT Reached 1.257400 The result of our accurate signals 🔥👏 ✅ 464.03% Profit 🆔
🔥 MTC Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe ✅ Long #DOT/USDT Entry zone : 1.029558 - 1.061400 Take Profits : 1.066653 1.098336 1.130019 1.161702 1.193385 Stop loss :0.987102 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
Showing the 12 most recent of 438 posts we hold for @binance_360. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529#1
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569#2
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426#3
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516#4
@Scalping_300 · 43,842#5
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703#6
@thewolfcrypto_official · 33,794#7
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 92,816#8
@Whales_Pumps · 52,930#9
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,922#10
@vip_profits · 23,056#11
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,399#12
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,821#13
@Binance_PROs · 34,194#14
@Official_GCR · 53,141#15
@CryptoInfinitum · 15,069#16
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,982#17
@BBB_Signals · 40,753#18
@next10xgem1 · 333,179#19
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,676#20
@Crypto_Radar_Pro · 38,713#21
@BCUSAReal · 148,051#22
@WhalesCircle · 39,898#23
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,717#24
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 15,500#25
@CryptoANalysis_CAN · 12,093#26
@cryptoleaopards · 20,707#27
@CryptoSatRed · 11,615#28
@thecryptoexpress · 262,052#29
@TCClubb · 3,887#30
@Binance_360_spot · 8,394#31
@thecryptolab6 · 5#32
@IamBTCT · 15,723#33
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 · 15,869#34
@Markhortrading · 4,003#35
@leaks_vip_signals · 10,406#36
@ForexSafeCalls · 12,812#37
@championtradersclub · 27,987#38
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 8,410#39
@Master_of_binanace · 10,766#40
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,951#41
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 330,638#42
@binancekillers · 300,874#43
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 47,601#44
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 21,040#45
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,663#46
@White_Bullss · 50,786#47
@harmonicshark · 54,363#48
@vip_signal · 190,235#49
@whalescryptovip · 209,022#50
@cryptocurrencyfutureandspot · 8,123#51
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397#52
@AmericanCryptoTrading · 19,902#53
@AishCrypto · 12,418#54
@tradingmaniacccrypto · 20,850#55
@BinanceLiquidations · 181,534#56
@bitcoinbrother · 11,740#57
@BullMarketMarker · 24,392 (as read 15 August 2026)#58
@crypto_futures_king · 39,816#59
@thebull_crypto · 176,069#60
@wiseadvicebysumit · 171,876#61
@RosePremiumm · 146,658#62
@NextLevelCryptoFree · 5,924#63
@binance_announcements · 3,514,395#64
@AlphaTradeZonex · 18,443#65
@CryptoHeaven · 46,480#66
@arscryptocalls7 · 131,590#67
@CryptoMermaids · 33,448#68
@HunterWolves · 79,677#69
@uscrypto2 · 11,773#70
@TraderAdrians · 3,447#71
@MaheeCrypto · 19,267#72
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,371#73
@Crypto_Trackers · 26,632#74
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607#75
@RoseSignalsPremium · 97,399#76
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 181,983#77
@PAIDROSE · 143,453#78
@CryptoTradingVipGroup · 4,447#79
@dogs · 7,196,362#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thewolfcrypto_official · 33,794
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@Scalping_300 · 43,842
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@binancemaster_trader · 30,991
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,922
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@Whales_Pumps · 52,930
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 77,648
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,663
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@Binance_PROs · 34,194
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@WhalesCircle · 39,898
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,399
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@cryptocapitalgl · 47,268
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@Official_GCR · 53,141
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@OnlyTradesX · 76,007
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@vip_signal · 190,235
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@trading_coin_master · 31,725
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@binance_Free_Crypto_Signal · 26,589
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,982
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
@BBB_Signals · 40,753
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@AmericanBinanceTradersOfficial · 33,819
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@harmonicshark · 54,363
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 115 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance 360” (@binance_360), 101,829 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binance_360.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.