Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYPTO LEOPARD'S

Channel

CRYPTO LEOPARD'S

@cryptoleaopards

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,962subscribers

+256 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052872813
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoleaopards
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoleaopards

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,67957,32036,499.57 August 2026 — 15,706 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,706 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,708 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,714 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,711 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,695 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,704 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,698 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,685 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,679 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,117 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,532 subscribers19 August 2026 — 57,320 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,199 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,153 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,073 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,043 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,060 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,952 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,852 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,752 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,722 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,713 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,693 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,682 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,699 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,684 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20,707 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,669 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,304 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,283 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,266 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,259 subscribers27 September 2026 — 16,286 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,194 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,148 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,108 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,099 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,084 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,070 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,064 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,052 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,042 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,001 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,979 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,974 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,962 subscribers15,9627 August 202624 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 78 days, net +256. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,433–63,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Oct 2026, 16:5615,962-12
23 Oct 2026, 15:4915,974-5
22 Oct 2026, 17:2815,979-22
21 Oct 2026, 09:4616,001-41
20 Oct 2026, 04:0116,042-10
19 Oct 2026, 04:2716,052-12
18 Oct 2026, 00:5916,064-6
17 Oct 2026, 01:4616,070-14
15 Oct 2026, 22:2716,084-15
14 Oct 2026, 19:4016,099-9
13 Oct 2026, 12:1716,108-40
9 Oct 2026, 12:1616,148-46
4 Oct 2026, 23:5716,194-92
27 Sept 2026, 23:5816,286+27
17 Sept 2026, 20:4116,259-7
15 Sept 2026, 18:2116,266-17
14 Sept 2026, 05:1816,283-21
12 Sept 2026, 09:5616,304-4,365
10 Sept 2026, 09:5920,669-38
7 Sept 2026, 06:1620,707first reading

Engagement

681 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 681 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8,500 reactions across 639 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,80656.5%
🔥95511.2%
👌5296.22%
⚡4705.53%
🏆4305.06%
🤩3934.62%
🆒1812.13%
🤓1712.01%
👏1251.47%
🎉1221.44%
🫡700.824%
🕊670.788%
🍾660.776%
✍450.529%
😎430.506%
😍270.318%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 640 of the 681 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,500 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 681 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 676 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptoleaopards. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 681 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥4❤3🏆1

3 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC217 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

➡️ #BR /USDT (SHORT) 🔽🔽 ⌛LEVERAGE : 20X TO 75X 📊 Short BELOW (0.3015)(0.3030) 🪙 TARGETS 🥇 0.2900 🥈 0.2777 🥉 0.2500 ⚠️ STOPLOSS : 0.3222 📣BE A PART OF TEAM LEOPARD BITUNIX PRO 💥Use only 1%margin of your total portfolio❤️😘😇

❤7👏3🏆2

3 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC221 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#LEOPARD_VIP_TRADE #UNI /USDT 📊📊 TAKE PROFIT 01✔️✔️ 155.54%💵 70% CLOSE 🔜 00 HOURS 50 MINUTES CLICK NOW BE A PART OF LEOPARD AT BITUNIX PRO FOR ANY INQUIRY @OWNERLEOPAR

🔥3❤1

3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC226 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#LEOPARD_VIP_TRADE #CHIP /USDT 📊📊 TAKE PROFIT 01✔️✔️ 176.44%💵 70% CLOSE 🔜 00 HOURS 37 MINUTES CLICK NOW BE A PART OF LEOPARD AT BITUNIX PRO FOR ANY INQUIRY @OWNERLEOPAR

❤2

3 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC280 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#LEOPARD_VIP_TRADE #MARCOIN /USDT 📊📊 TAKE PROFIT 01✔️✔️ 148.92%💵 70% CLOSE 🔜 00 HOURS 13 MINUTES CLICK NOW BE A PART OF LEOPARD AT BITUNIX PRO FOR ANY INQUIRY @OWNERLEOPAR

❤4🔥2

3 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC294 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026

GOOD MORNING ☀️☀️☀️ ARE YOU READY TO EARN TODAY LET ME KNOW WITH YOUR REACTIONS

❤14🤓5👌4⚡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 681 posts we hold for @cryptoleaopards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

#btc

  1. 80k56%
  2. 75k46%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTCAnonymous Poll64 voters

WANT FREE TRADE

  1. Yes91%
  2. No9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

#BTC

  1. 82k61%
  2. 75k39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTCAnonymous Poll97 voters

WHICH KIND OF PAIRS YOU WANT TO TRADE

  1. CRYPTOUSDT94%
  2. STOCKSUSDT7%
  3. FOREXUSDT14%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 681 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Pulse Matrix®
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 28,092
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
Binance Features Signals
@BinanceFeatures_signal · 21,762
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 17 September 2026
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 42,922
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
MAHEE CRYPTO
@MaheeCrypto · 21,787
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
NOOR CRYPTO
@noorcrypto · 69,587
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto Mermaids
@CryptoMermaids · 32,354
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
CGS-CRYPTO GENUINE
@CGScryptoGenuine · 14,113
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Crypto World Updates
@cryptoworld99911 · 3,783
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
📉 CRYPTO VIP Signals
@BitmexSignalsFee · 20,219
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 September 2026
THE WOLF (CRYPTO)®
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,032
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
CRYPTO MASTER PRO ®️ (FUTURES TRADING)
@crypto_master_pro_signals · 35,925
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
TRADINGBYCFAI™
@tradingbycfai · 33,170
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙭 𝘼𝙡𝙥𝙝𝙖 𝘾𝙡𝙪𝙗
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 13
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
𝗣𝗥𝗢 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 🔰
@Binance_PROs · 34,028
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
CRYPTO MONK
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,596
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
BullFrog Crypto
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,796
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
VIP Results (binance 360)
@vip_profits · 22,772
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,596
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 185,565
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,052
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Hunter Wolves | Crypto 🐺
@HunterWolves · 77,321
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,321
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
CFTrader Original Public VIP
@CFTopTrading · 1,678
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
CRYPTO GEEK
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,237
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTO LEOPARD'S” (@cryptoleaopards), 15,962 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoleaopards.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.