🔥 RFD Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe ✅ LONG #MARSCOIN/USDT Entry zone : 0.0955159 - 0.0984700 Take Profits : 0.0989574 0.1018967 0.1048360 0.1077754 0.1107147 Stop loss :0.0915771 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360

Channel
VIP Results (binance 360)
@vip_profits
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,959subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001252363647 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vip_profits |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vip_profits |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 22,959 | -9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 22,968 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 22,999 | -19 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 23,018 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 23,033 | -23 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 23,056 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 23,059 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 23,080 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 23,084 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 23,085 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 23,076 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 23,075 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 23,077 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 23,081 | -17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 23,098 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 23,093 | -14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 23,107 | -24 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 23,131 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 23,143 | -16 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 23,159 | first reading |
Engagement
1,160 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.275%
- avg views ÷ 22,959 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 63.1
- 440 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 440
- of 1,160 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,160 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 27,778 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
#MARSCOIN/USDT Reached 0.1121000 Congrats all VIP members 🔥🔥 ✅ 279.8% Profit 🆔
🔥 MTC Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe 🔴 SHORT #AKE/USDT Entry zone : 0.0149782 - 0.0145420 Take Profits : 0.0144685 0.0140301 0.0135916 0.0131532 0.0127147 Stop loss :0.01555994 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
#AKE/USDT Reached 0.0124530 Hope you guys enjoyed this premium signal too 🚀 ✅ 361.91% Profit 🆔
#BULLA/USDT Reached 0.0290360 The result of our accurate signals 🔥👏 ✅ 729.09% Profit 🆔
🔥 RFD Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe ✅ LONG #BULLA/USDT Entry zone : 0.0218230 - 0.0224980 Take Profits : 0.0226093 0.0232809 0.0239524 0.0246240 0.0252956 Stop loss :0.02092314 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
🔥 RFD Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe ✅ LONG #CHIP/USDT Entry zone : 0.0418846 - 0.0431800 Take Profits : 0.0433937 0.0446826 0.0459715 0.0472605 0.0485494 Stop loss :0.0401574 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
#CHIP/USDT Reached 0.0536700 Enjoy with VIP signals 🔥🔥 ✅ 611.39% Profit 🆔
🔥 MTC Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe 🔴 SHORT #T/USDT Entry zone : 0.0052581 - 0.0051050 Take Profits : 0.0050792 0.0049253 0.0047713 0.0046174 0.0044635 Stop loss :0.00546235 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
#T/USDT Reached 0.0043920 Congrats all VIP members 🔥🔥 ✅ 350.85% Profit 🆔
🔥 MTC Indicator 🔥 15 Minutes Timeframe ✅ Long #ARB/USDT Entry zone : 0.105206 - 0.108460 Take Profits : 0.108996 0.112234 0.115471 0.118709 0.121947 Stop loss :0.1008678 Leverage: 10x 🆔 @binance_360
#ARB/USDT Reached 0.139920 The result of our accurate signals 🔥👏 ✅ 582.19% Profit 🆔
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,160 posts we hold for @vip_profits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@binance_360 · 101,441#1
@crypto_musk1 · 81,517#2
@gorilla_crypto · 194,169#3
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938#4
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,956#5
@Scalping_300 · 43,706#6
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,232#7
@Whales_Pumps · 53,359#8
@Binance_PROs · 34,230#9
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,064#10
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,595#11
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,504#12
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 91,963#13
@CryptoInfinitum · 15,061#14
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,714#15
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,839#16
@BBB_Signals · 40,503#17
@Official_GCR · 53,205#18
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,844#19
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,660#20
@WhalesCircle · 40,708#21
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 15,393#22
@TCClubb · 3,882#23
@thecryptolab6 · 8,724#24
@Master_of_binanace · 10,745#25
@cryptoleaopards · 16,259#26
@Binance_360_spot · 8,384#27
@CryptoANalysis_CAN · 12,002#28
@CryptoSatRed · 11,548#29
@ForexSafeCalls · 14,794#30
@Markhortrading · 3,977#31
@next10xgem1 · 330,292#32
@IamBTCT · 15,574#33
@championtradersclub · 27,776#34
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 · 15,746#35
@BCUSAReal · 148,789#36
@cryptocurrencyfutureandspot · 7,977#37
@thecryptoexpress · 258,705#38
@cryptovipsignals120 · 3,616#39
@binancekillers · 299,991#40
@harmonicshark · 53,790#41
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,558#42
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,978#43
@Always_winn · 6,224#44
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 326,728#45
@vip_signal · 188,444#46
@NextLevelCryptoFree · 5,890#47
@crypto_futures_king · 39,445#48
@stellarmom777 · 1,480 (as read 19 September 2026)#49
@tradingmaniacccrypto · 20,669#50
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,907#51
@AishCrypto · 12,710#52
@cryptoamanclub · 104,538#53
@AlphaTradeZonex · 18,750#54
@CoinChiefs · 745#55
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,667#56
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,858#57
@CryptoHeaven · 46,388#58
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875#59
@CryptoMermaids · 33,206#60
@uscrypto2 · 11,813#61
@HunterWolves · 79,043#62
@TraderAdrians · 3,422#63
@MaheeCrypto · 19,989#64
@Crypto1rise · 6,937 (as read 19 September 2026)#65
@Crypto_Trackers · 26,571#66
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 316,125#67
@KingCryptoProfits · 2,613#68
@TCGFORYOU · 75,033#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Signalpeak24 · 23,188
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
@binance_360 · 101,441
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@Scalping_300 · 43,706
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 76,864
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_musk1 · 81,517
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
@trading_coin_master · 31,351
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@Binance_PROs · 34,230
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@Profittrde · 34,673
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
@gorilla_crypto · 194,169
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@binancemaster_trader · 30,915
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
@binance_Free_Crypto_Signal · 26,517
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,064
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,595
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@Trading_Signals_Futures_Binance · 36,497
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
@vip_signal · 188,444
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@Whales_Pumps · 53,359
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 29,558
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@parthfoster · 22,668
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 20 September 2026
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,504
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,714
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,839
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
@WhalesCircle · 40,708
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
@championtradersclub · 27,776
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VIP Results (binance 360)” (@vip_profits), 22,959 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vip_profits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.