$BNB Chain is leading the blockchain race by active addresses The latest monthly data shows 162.2M active addresses across 98 chains. And the leaderboard is interesting π π’ BNB Chain β 24.2% π΅ Solana β 21.3% π£ Tron β 11.5% π©· opBNB β 7.2% βͺ Bitcoin β 6.5% πΉ Robinhood Chain β 5.9% πΉ Ethereum β 5.8% π‘ Litecoin β 2.8% π Polygon β 2.4% π£ Base β 1.9% BNB Chain + Solana alone account for 45.5% of all monthly active addrβ¦

Channel
π²ππ’πππ πππ
@CryptoSatRed
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
11,731subscribers
-143 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001939452549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoSatRed |
| Description | β’ πΌπππππ πππππππ β’ π΅ππππππ πππππππ β’ π°πππππππ’ ππππ : πΏπΆ - πΏπ»% π²ππππππ @Sat_Red |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoSatRed |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 11,731 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 11,746 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 11,761 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 11,771 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 11,776 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 11,788 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 11,805 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 11,824 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 11,829 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 11,834 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 11,849 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 11,861 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 11,863 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 11,873 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 11,874 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 11,874 | first reading |
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 4.48%
- avg views Γ· 11,731 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 525
- 92 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.57%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 92
- of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 92 (4 August 2026 β 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,329 |
| Reactions total | 569 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β6,800
- Videos
- β54
- Links
- β1,770
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 23 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
569 reactions across 68 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 163 | 28.6% | |
| π₯ | 148 | 26.0% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 102 | 17.9% | |
| customΒ 5217449524410199951 | 88 | 15.5% | |
| π | 44 | 7.73% | |
| π | 19 | 3.34% | |
| π | 3 | 0.527% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 0.351% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 569reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 92 we hold a reading for Β· 7%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @CryptoSatRed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Just pay 79.5USDT for One Year VIP Membership βοΈβοΈ
β€βπ₯3customΒ 52174495244101999513πΎ2π1π₯1
Our VIP CHANNEL fees are at an All-time Low now πΈ Contact @Sat_Red to join now Don't miss this dump β οΈ
π3β€βπ₯2π1π1
$SUI 6th target loading π€ 230% profit achieved in this trade. Like the post if you're still holding it π
β€βπ₯3π₯3π1π1
ETF Flows Update (21 August 2026) β’ $BTC : +$68.17 Million β’ $ETH : +$24.16 Million β’ $XRP : +$18.38 Million β’ $SOL : +$10.07 Million β’ $HYPE : $0 Bitcoin ETF recorded inflows of $68.17M on August 21. Ethereum posted an inflow of $24.16M, XRP added $18.38M, Solana saw $10.07M, while HyperLiquid remained flat.
π3β€βπ₯2π2
Good morning guys
customΒ 52174495244101999517β€βπ₯2π2π1
Today's VIP SIGNAL π₯ $GALA 4TH TARGET COMPLETED 14% up ... 140% profit with 10x leverage π₯
β€βπ₯2π2π₯1
offer ends in this weekend β οΈ Contact @Sat_Red to JOIN VIP πΈ
β€βπ₯3π2π₯1π1
Fear & Greed Index climbed from 69 to 73 in 6 hours, while Bitcoin decided to take a quick dump from $79,500 to $76,411. β’ BTC down 3.5% in the past 4 hours β’ $187M longs liquidated β’ $76M shorts liquidated The market is moving insanely fast right now.
π2π2customΒ 52174495244101999512
π $BTC HITS $79,500 On this auspicious day β¨ Iβm making a special offer to all my beloved telegram membersπΎ π 1 YEAR VIP β JUST $79.5 π One special day. One special price. 1 FULL YEAR VIP Trades πΈ If youβve been waiting to join, this is your chance! π€
π4π₯4β€βπ₯3customΒ 52174495244101999511
$BGB is waking up π₯ It has already pumped 14% this week. The price is now around $1.88. If buyers keep the pressure on and $2 breaks cleanlyβ¦ β’ $2.10 β $2.20 could come into play. The bigger picture is getting bullish, but Iβd still watch how the price reacts around $2.
π3π₯2β€βπ₯1customΒ 52174495244101999511
π° $SUI /USDT πΌ LONG β³οΈ ENTRY (Use DCA STRATEGY) : 0.7640 , 0.7500 , 0.7400 π― TARGETS - 0.7750 , 0.7900 , 0.8120 , 0.8300 , 0.8700 , 0.9500 , 1.2 ποΈ LEVERAGE - cross 10x π΄ STOPLOSS - 0.7240 Recommended Exchages to trade π ByBit | GATE | BITGET | WEEX π― TRADING PLAN β οΈ My chart doesn't control the market. This is just my personal view, and I can be completely wrong. Do your own research, manage your risk, andβ¦
β€βπ₯6π3π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @CryptoSatRed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arscryptocalls7 Β· 133,158
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here β alongside 81 others β read 13 August 2026
@crypto_musk1 Β· 81,317
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 18 August 2026
@binance_360 Β· 101,745
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 15 August 2026
@Crypto_Safe_Calls Β· 135,775
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here β alongside 78 others β read 13 August 2026
@harmonicshark Β· 55,285
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here β alongside 73 others β read 23 August 2026
@gorilla_crypto Β· 175,885
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 12 August 2026
@KingCryptoCalls Β· 318,613
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 10 August 2026
@Free_Binance_Crypto_Future Β· 130,292
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 13 August 2026
@CryptoPlanetCalls Β· 105,182
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 15 August 2026
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified Β· 94,201
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here β alongside 87 others β read 16 August 2026
@AlexFriedmanCrypto Β· 74,978
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here β alongside 88 others β read 19 August 2026
@OnlyTradesX Β· 76,185
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here β alongside 77 others β read 19 August 2026
@HunterWolves Β· 80,794
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ²ππ’πππ πππβ (@CryptoSatRed), 11,731 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoSatRed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.