✅ New signal just dropped https://t.me/+KeHpQI3rlw9kNGE0 VIP joins here: https://t.me/+lR7WwXee_95hMmJk

Channel
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
81,543subscribers
-186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001727857237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_musk1 |
| Description | ⚡️ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁: @David_promoter1 ✅ 𝗩𝗜𝗣 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳𝘀: @musk_proofs 🔥 𝟭𝟱+ 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗩𝗜𝗣 👉 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 & 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_musk1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:48 | 81,543 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:47 | 81,557 | +42 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 81,515 | -65 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 81,580 | -43 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:29 | 81,623 | -47 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:55 | 81,670 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:31 | 81,685 | +39 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 81,646 | -25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 81,671 | +12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 81,659 | +8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:37 | 81,651 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 81,662 | +4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 81,658 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 81,659 | +40 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:04 | 81,619 | +23 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 81,596 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:01 | 81,604 | +35 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 81,569 | -63 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 81,632 | -54 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 81,686 | first reading |
Engagement
1,327 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 329 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.58%
- avg views ÷ 81,543 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,290
- 437 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 437
- of 1,327 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,327 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 562,907 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈20,200
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈2,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 437 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📈#ARK/USDT 💥125.76% profit ✔️ Based on 🥈 Thunder Strategy (Price Action) Join our VIP Channel for exclusive signals based on advanced Price Action strategies 📊 ↗️ VIP proofs : @musk_proofs ➡️ DM for VIP : @david_promoter1
125% Profit
🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #ARK/USDT Entry : 1) 0.1496000 2) 0.145112 Targets : 1) 0.1504591 2) 0.1535843 3) 0.1567096 4) 0.1598349 🛑 Stop : 0.1401752 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @crypto_musk1
#Free #Futures_signal 🟢 Long #BCH/USDT Entry : 1) 245.74 2) 238.36 Targets : 1) 247.15 2) 252.28 3) 257.41 4) 262.55 🛑 Stop : 230.25 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @crypto_musk1
🍀 Best Channels Below 🍀 VIP Channel: https://t.me/+uvHJFHljokhhMDRk Free Signals: https://t.me/+KysYWWLQa9Y4YTE1
📉#BCH/USDT 💥498.41% profit ✔️ Based on 🥈 Nova Strategy (Price Action) Join our VIP Channel for exclusive signals based on advanced Price Action strategies 📊 ↗️ VIP proofs : @musk_proofs ➡️ DM for VIP : @david_promoter1
🔴 SHORT 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Nova Strategy #BCH/USDT Entry : 1) 277.12 2) 285.43 Targets : 1) 275.49 2) 269.64 3) 263.79 4) 257.94 🛑 Stop : 294.57 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @crypto_musk1
498% Profit 🚀
#Free #Futures_signal 🟢 Long #XLM/USDT Entry : 1) 0.15054 2) 0.14602 Targets : 1) 0.15140 2) 0.15454 3) 0.15769 4) 0.16083 🛑 Stop : 0.14105 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @crypto_musk1
🚀 Catch the next move early https://t.me/+lR7WwXee_95hMmJk VIP access here: https://t.me/+Di2Ml3LejGNkOTI1
#XTZ/USDT 90% Profit 🚀🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,327 posts we hold for @crypto_musk1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 186 posts on @crypto_musk1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 79
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@binance_360 · 100,920#1
@gorilla_crypto · 181,942#2
@KingCryptoCalls · 294,807#3
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,305#4
@arscryptocalls7 · 126,564#5
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 130,872#6
@Whales_Pumps · 53,526#7
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,740#8
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,563#9
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,524#10
@CryptoMermaids · 32,245#11
@Crypto_Radar_Pro · 38,451#12
@Official_GCR · 53,584#13
@Binance_PROs · 33,833#14
@CryptoInfinitum · 14,527#15
@BBB_Signals · 38,881#16
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 17#17
@vip_profits · 22,636#18
@next10xgem1 · 321,206#19
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,597#20
@uscrypto2 · 11,882#21
@BCUSAReal · 145,113#22
@WhalesCircle · 43,049#23
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,228#24
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 14,900#25
@cryptoleaopards · 54,190#26
@CryptoANalysis_CAN · 12,531#27
@CryptoSatRed · 11,130#28
@TCClubb · 3,743#29
@CryptoAlphaLab · 15,143 (as read 18 August 2026)#30
@leaks_vip_signals · 9,964#31
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 · 14,946#32
@thecryptolab6 · 8,619#33
@championtradersclub · 26,675#34
@Master_of_binanace · 10,721#35
@Binance_360_spot · 8,349#36
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 7,986#37
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 309,333#38
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,696#39
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,601#40
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 16,911#41
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,470#42
@binancekillers · 234,330#43
@cryptocurrencyfutureandspot · 6,928#44
@harmonicshark · 50,484#45
@White_Bullss · 47,624#46
@AishCrypto · 13,293#47
@AmericanCryptoTrading · 18,907#48
@cryptoamanclub · 100,527#49
@bitcoinbrother · 14,441#50
@vip_signal · 181,615#51
@tradingmaniacccrypto · 19,786#52
@CryptoTradingVipGroup · 4,366#53
@AlphaTradeZonex · 18,933#54
@whalescryptovip · 199,260#55
@NextLevelCryptoFree · 3#56
@AndrewCryptolog · 6,369#57
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,286#58
@BullMarketMarker · 24,334 (as read 18 August 2026)#59
@wiseadvicebysumit · 163,323#60
@FedRussianInsidersOfficial · 20,723#61
@CryptoHeaven · 44,723#62
@Scalping_300 · 42,705#63
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,201#64
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,028#65
@HunterWolves · 76,824#66
@TraderAdrians · 3,316#67
@MaheeCrypto · 21,899#68
@Markhortrading · 3,877#69
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,852#70
@IamBTCT · 14,772#71
@thecryptoexpress · 247,413#72
@Crypto_Trackers · 26,148#73
@RoseSignalsPremium · 93,844#74
@TCGFORYOU · 74,356#75
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 174,313#76
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,189#77
@crypto_futures_king · 37,055#78
@PAIDROSE · 136,887#79
@BitcoinBullets_VipOfficial · 20,389#80
@dogs · 6,451,094#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptoworld99911 · 7,814
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,740
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
@Official_GCR · 53,584
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@Whales_Pumps · 53,526
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
@binance_360 · 100,920
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
@gorilla_crypto · 181,942
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@vip_profits · 22,636
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 16,911
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@CryptoMermaids · 32,245
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
@Binance_PROs · 33,833
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,524
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@OnlyTradesX · 74,726
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@arscryptocalls7 · 126,564
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 130,872
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
@championtradersclub · 26,675
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
@binancemaster_trader · 30,572
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 17
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
@BBB_Signals · 38,881
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@Crypto_Future_Free_Signals_Tradi · 43,506
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@Free_Binance_Crypto_Future · 114,171
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@KingCryptoCalls · 294,807
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,696
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
@crypto_crown_signals · 21,815
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
@binance_signal_future_trading · 24,746
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 157 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Musk” (@crypto_musk1), 81,543 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_musk1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.