‼️ The market is very frofitable now and offering very good opportunities to earn Don't miss the chance for personalized work - 4 spots available today Right now there's a signal with at least +100% movement potential Do you have over $1000-2000 in your deposit? I'm ready to share a trade with you on special terms write here ➡️ @OnlyTradesTeam

Channel
Only Trades
@OnlyTradesX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,891subscribers
-985 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001540781192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OnlyTradesX |
| Description | Manager: @OnlyTradesTeam |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OnlyTradesX |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 75,891 | -116 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 76,007 | -94 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 76,101 | -86 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:06 | 76,187 | -97 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:24 | 76,284 | -33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 76,317 | -71 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 76,388 | -67 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 76,455 | +44 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 76,411 | +45 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 76,366 | +184 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 76,182 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 76,193 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 76,195 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 76,185 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 76,227 | -39 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 76,266 | -88 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 76,354 | -86 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 76,440 | -77 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 76,517 | -51 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 76,568 | first reading |
Engagement
390 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.0%
- avg views ÷ 75,891 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,370
- 340 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 340
- of 390 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 340 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 390 (5 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,846,287 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 00:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈15,500
- Videos
- ≈358
- Links
- ≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 32s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 390 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OnlyTradesX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 390 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
💎 Former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon left the industry over fears that AI could wipe out humanity. He worked on pretraining models and now says the largest AI labs are effectively in a race to build self-improving superintelligence. And the people actually building these systems fully understand the potential consequences. Coxon says: "The people building AI genuinely believe it could kill all of us b…
💎 How do you like the new iPhone design? In my opinion, it's terrible. Not upgrading... for now 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 😊For premium signals 👉@OnlyTradesTeam ⚡️Trade without KYC 👉BinoDex 🥶 Trader's Club 👉Join
🔥Client's profit: UNI long +$1,956 Almost +200% on a single $UNI trade. My client entered, held, and walked away with +$1,956 in profit. Clean execution, strong return - another win added to the track record💎💸 👀Your golden trade is next. Stop watching - the signal is already waiting for you. DM @OnlyTradesTeam
💎 Tomorrow, increased volatility begins due to economic data. Two days full of surprises. If inflation and its pace decline, the market will react with a good long move. Otherwise, we'll be looking at 75,000–73,000$ 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 😊For premium signals 👉@OnlyTradesTeam ⚡️Trade without KYC 👉BinoDex 🥶 Trader's Club 👉Join
💎 $WIF waiting for the push to $0.27 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 😊For premium signals 👉@OnlyTradesTeam ⚡️Trade without KYC 👉BinoDex 🥶 Trader's Club 👉Join
💎 Well, as expected The "smart fast-flippers" have an average of 300. Started with low liquidity and rugged immediately Hunter Biden thanks every participant for their contribution to paying off his loans! 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 😊For premium signals 👉@OnlyTradesTeam ⚡️Trade without KYC 👉BinoDex 🥶 Trader's Club 👉Join
💎 You're sitting in $LAPTOP? I skipped it I don't jump into that stuff But if anyone made millions on it, send it to me show off
Bro while you're heading toward 100k, I'm walking alongside you toward my first 5k on the balance all thanks to you
💎 Almost $100,000 on the balance as part of our premium signal challenge From $30k to $100k just a tiny bit left and we'll close it For your convenience, I've added the hashtag #CHALLENGE to all trades in it This time, an excellent trade on $LIT brought us profit the breakout was obvious. Congrats to everyone who trade with us . the next signal is coming very soon. ➡️ DM @OnlyTradesTeam
💎 $DYDX from this range, it will fly to a new high 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 😊For premium signals 👉@OnlyTradesTeam ⚡️Trade without KYC 👉BinoDex 🥶 Trader's Club 👉Join
💎Hot premium signal at 12:00 gmt 💎 Terms of receiving the signal: 🔵25$ prepayment 🔵You send 50% of the profits after you receive them ⚡ I'm entering this signal myself with a good amount, so I expect at least a 100% move DM @OnlyTradesTeam
Showing the 12 most recent of 390 posts we hold for @OnlyTradesX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@OnlyTradesX edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 17 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426#1
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529#2
@binance_360 · 101,829#3
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569#4
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516#5
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,039#6
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 92,816#7
@arscryptocalls7 · 131,590#8
@CryproTV_en · 154,528#9
@next10xgem1 · 333,179#10
@thecryptoexpress · 261,006#11
@storm_in_defi · 1,151 (as read 19 August 2026)#12
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703#13
@BCUSAReal · 148,267#14
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,894#15
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 330,638#16
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,798#17
@Whales_Pumps · 52,930#18
@cryptocapitalgl · 47,268#19
@BBB_Signals · 40,753#20
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607#21
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,737#22
@CryptoMermaids · 33,448#23
@thewolfcrypto_official · 33,794#24
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,399#25
@vip_signal · 189,716#26
@wiseadvicebysumit · 171,876#27
@quoteX · 1,437,007#28
@crypto_futures_king · 39,658#29
@championtradersclub · 27,987#30
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,890#31
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,717#32
@Official_GCR · 53,141#33
@WhalesCircle · 39,898#34
@CryptoANalysis_CAN · 12,093#35
@ggshot · 93,391#36
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 15,500#37
@Binance_PROs · 34,194#38
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 181,983#39
@whalescryptovip · 209,022#40
@TraderAdrians · 3,442#41
@IamBTCT · 15,676#42
@bitcoinbrother · 11,740#43
@cryptoleaopards · 20,669#44
@HunterWolves · 79,677#45
@vip_profits · 23,056#46
@Crypto_Trackers · 26,632#47
@thebull_crypto · 176,069#48
@Whalesguide · 202,470#49
@cryptoomonarch · 239,369#50
@cryptotrademaster · 38,366#51
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397#52
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 · 15,869#53
@AndrewCryptolog · 6,591#54
@PAIDROSE · 143,453#55
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,951#56
@White_Bullss · 50,786#57
@CNTrades · 11,337#58
@BullMarketMarker · 24,319 (as read 19 August 2026)#59
@CryptoClassics · 127,355#60
@CryptoInfinitum · 15,081#61
@Crypto_PrePump · 106,789#62
@CryptoSatRed · 11,600#63
@RosePremiumm · 146,347#64
@official_BCcoin · 90,140#65
@thecryptolab6 · 5#66
@Crypto_Radar_Pro · 38,713#67
@BitBeamCrypto · 6,471#68
@Futures100xonly · 4,077#69
@binancekillers · 300,874#70
@CryptoHeaven · 46,450#71
@gram · 6,785,001#72
@Scalping_300 · 43,842#73
@dexpumps · 45,124#74
@toncommunitychannel · 776,097#75
@OfficialCryptoPatel · 27,161#76
@open4profit · 80,524#77
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,620#78
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryproTV_en · 154,528
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@cryptocapitalgl · 47,268
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
@cryptotrademaster · 38,366
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@TheAnalystCrypto · 72,173
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
@drcrypto_trading · 30,906
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@sinunicorn · 100,747
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
@ecommerce_AI · 57,231
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
@CryptoNoob_en · 76,003
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_showcase_en · 56,778
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
@milfz_crypto · 109,408
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@vip_signal · 189,716
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@tradingcoach · 70,724
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@CryptoClassics · 127,355
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Only Trades” (@OnlyTradesX), 75,891 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OnlyTradesX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.