🚀 PUMP GROUP : ➡️LINK 1 😈 SCALPING GROUP : ➡️LINK 2
Signed Atian promoter

Channel
@BBB_Signals
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,171subscribers
-1,225 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001756316676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BBB_Signals |
| Description | 🤖 𝐕𝐈𝐏/𝐏𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 @BoomBoomAdmin Front Desk Officer : @BBB_Support_Team If You Don't Buy in Red, You Have Nothing To Sell In Green 🌍 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦🌟 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 44 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BBB_Signals |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 40,171 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 40,179 | -39 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 40,218 | -23 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 40,241 | -41 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:48 | 40,282 | +28 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 40,254 | -31 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 40,285 | -50 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 40,335 | -61 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 40,396 | -83 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 40,479 | -105 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 40,584 | +81 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 40,503 | -101 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 40,604 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 40,602 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 40,622 | -42 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 40,664 | -89 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 40,753 | -27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 40,780 | -55 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 40,835 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 40,837 | first reading |
1,220 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 216 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 265 of 432 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,220 (6 August 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 253,342 |
| Reactions total | 1,143 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 19:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,259 reactions across 696 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,802 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 269 | 8.25% | |
| 👍 | 229 | 7.03% | |
| 😍 | 195 | 5.98% | |
| ☃ | 76 | 2.33% | |
| 😎 | 69 | 2.12% | |
| 🤗 | 65 | 1.99% | |
| 🕊 | 60 | 1.84% | |
| 😘 | 54 | 1.66% | |
| 🐳 | 48 | 1.47% | |
| 🎉 | 47 | 1.44% | |
| 🍓 | 46 | 1.41% | |
| 🆒 | 43 | 1.32% | |
| 🤩 | 42 | 1.29% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 1.10% | |
| 🎄 | 34 | 1.04% | |
| ⚡ | 29 | 0.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 0.859% | |
| ✍ | 20 | 0.614% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 0.583% | |
| 9 further kinds | 48 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 703 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 PUMP GROUP : ➡️LINK 1 😈 SCALPING GROUP : ➡️LINK 2
Signed Atian promoter
🔥 #XLM_USDT — LONG SETUP DELIVERED📉 The XLM Long setup delivered a strong Pump. ❤️💰 👀 Setup spotted. Move delivered. Stay active, disciplined & patient. 🧠🎯 For VIP & Updates 👇 ☎️ @BBB_Support_Team 🚀
🔥1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🔰 PAIR: XLM/ USDT 💹 🟢Position: LONG🚀 ☑️ Entry Zone: 💠 0.1850 💠 0.1845 🌐 Leverage: Cross • 50X ⚡🔥 🎯 Take Profit Targets: 🥇 0.1863 🥈 0.1870 🥉 0.1886 ❌ Stop Loss: 🔴0.1836 💎 VIP Signals: @BBB_Support_Team✨
❤4
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
READY TRADERS?❤️
❤3👍2
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🚀 #𝐎𝐍𝐃𝐎_𝐔𝐒𝐃𝐓 — 𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐇 𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐓𝐒 𝐇𝐈𝐓🎯 ✅ 𝐓𝐏𝟏 + 𝐓𝐏𝟐 𝐀𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐃 💰 This is what 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐘 looks like! 📊🔥 Another successful 𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐆 𝐒𝐈𝐆𝐍𝐀𝐋, with both targets achieved as planned. 💎 𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐂𝐊 𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐂𝐘 and see the results for yourself. 👀📈 💎 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐈𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍 • 𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 • 𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐔𝐋𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐕𝐈𝐏 & 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬👇 ☎️ @BBB_Support_Team 🚀
❤1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🔰 PAIR: ONDO/ USDT 💹 🟢Position: LONG🚀 ☑️ Entry Zone: 💠 0.4555 💠 0.4514 🌐 Leverage: Cross • 50X ⚡🔥 🎯 Take Profit Targets: 🥇 0.4625 🥈 0.4663 🥉 0.4735 ❌ Stop Loss: 🔴0.4466 💎 VIP Signals: @BBB_Support_Team✨
❤2😍1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
READY?❤️
❤8⚡2
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🧠 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘’𝐒 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐒𝐄𝐓 𝐖𝐀𝐈𝐓 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 — 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍. 📊 We don’t need every trade. We need the RIGHT trade at the RIGHT time. 🎯 🔥 𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 • 𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐈𝐏𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐄 • 𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐊 𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 Let’s stay sharp and catch only the moves that deserve our attention. 🚀❤️ 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐕𝐄, 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐳 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘🔥 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐕𝐈𝐏 & 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬👇 ☎️ @BBB_Support_Team 🚀
❤1🎉1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
📊 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲𝘀 😀 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘂𝗺𝘀 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 3️⃣0️⃣ 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗨𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗡𝗟𝗬 🚀https://t.me/+RjXo1alkIeFlMzNl
Signed Atian promoter
🚨STOP BUYING VIP SIGNALS🚨 We accept 50 more people without money✅⬇️ https://t.me/+hsyj-2HsntY2Nzlk
Signed Vertex Promoter
🚨 ℍ𝕚𝕕𝕕𝕖𝕟 𝟙𝟘𝟘𝕩 𝔾𝔼𝕄 𝕛𝕦𝕤𝕥 𝕗𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕 𝕁𝕠𝕚𝕟 𝕓𝕖𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕖 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕡𝕦𝕞𝕡 🚀 ✅📥 https://t.me/+WVRC4FEmJCs0ZTBk https://t.me/+AKcjTEF0YVZhOWU0 𝕃𝕆𝕎 𝕄𝔸ℝ𝕂𝔼𝕋 ℂ𝔸ℙ !!!!! ℍ𝕌𝔾𝔼 ℙ𝕆𝕋𝔼ℕ𝕋𝕀𝔸𝕃 !!!
Signed ZEE | PROMOTER
🌅 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐳 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 ❤️😍
☃1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,220 posts we hold for @BBB_Signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@BBB_Signals edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 38 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 WHICH MARKET OVERVIEW DO YOU WANT NEXT? 👀
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒, 𝐋𝐄𝐓’𝐒 𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐒𝐄𝐓🧠📈 What separates a disciplined trader from a losing trader? 👀
The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 WHAT’S YOUR BIGGEST TRADING STRUGGLE?
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 What’s Holding You Back in Trading?
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 WHAT’S YOUR BIGGEST CHALLENGE IN TRADING?
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥 TRADERS, LET’S TEST YOUR MINDSET… 🧠 If you could remove ONE habit from your trading forever, what would it be? 👀
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 87 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boom_Boom_Billionaires” (@BBB_Signals), 40,171 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BBB_Signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.