PAID GROUP IS NOW FREE FOR NEXT 3 MINUTES 🚀 HURRY UP JOIN QUICKLY 🚀 NO.1 Channel FOR 3x-5x signals 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+AzLl_hQlcIs1MTM0
Signed Atian promoter

Channel
@BBB_Signals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,780subscribers
-616 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001756316676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BBB_Signals |
| Description | 🤖 𝐕𝐈𝐏/𝐏𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 @BoomBoomAdmin Front Desk Officer : @BBB_Support_Team If You Don't Buy in Red, You Have Nothing To Sell In Green 🌍 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦🌟 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BBB_Signals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 40,780 | -55 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 40,835 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 40,837 | +18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 40,819 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 40,846 | +9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 40,837 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 40,860 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 40,868 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 40,872 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 40,874 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 40,904 | -32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 40,936 | +29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 40,907 | -61 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 40,968 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 40,973 | -35 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 41,008 | -33 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 41,041 | -85 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 41,126 | -50 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 41,176 | -34 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 41,210 | first reading |
581 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 440 of 580 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 581 (6 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 294,438 |
| Reactions total | 2,105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 10:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,105 reactions across 436 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 981 | 46.6% | |
| 👍 | 178 | 8.46% | |
| 🔥 | 141 | 6.70% | |
| 😍 | 116 | 5.51% | |
| 😘 | 81 | 3.85% | |
| ☃ | 71 | 3.37% | |
| 🆒 | 55 | 2.61% | |
| 🐳 | 51 | 2.42% | |
| 😎 | 49 | 2.33% | |
| 🤗 | 48 | 2.28% | |
| ⚡ | 43 | 2.04% | |
| 🕊 | 42 | 2.00% | |
| 🍓 | 40 | 1.90% | |
| 🎉 | 35 | 1.66% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 1.57% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 1.43% | |
| 🎄 | 26 | 1.24% | |
| 🦄 | 25 | 1.19% | |
| 🏆 | 17 | 0.808% | |
| ✍ | 14 | 0.665% | |
| 8 further kinds | 29 | 1.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 440 of the 581 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 581 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
PAID GROUP IS NOW FREE FOR NEXT 3 MINUTES 🚀 HURRY UP JOIN QUICKLY 🚀 NO.1 Channel FOR 3x-5x signals 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+AzLl_hQlcIs1MTM0
Signed Atian promoter
🎯 Expected profit: 1500%+ 👉 VIP SIGNALS 👉 50x PROFIT JOIN FAST👇👇 📌 https://t.me/+sx3P2Cfi2A4zNmY0
❤1
Signed Channels Advertiser
🚨 #HYPE_USDT — STRICTLY MONITORED 👀 Our team is actively monitoring this trade. 📊 If the market moves against our direction or any exit is required, we’ll update you immediately. ⚠️ Follow our updates exactly. Don’t make any changes on your own. 🔐 💎 Stay Connected • Stay Disciplined 🚀 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐕𝐈𝐏 & 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬👇 ☎️ @BBB_Support_Team 🚀
❤2🎄1👨💻1😍1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🔰 PAIR: HYPE/ USDT 💹 🟢Position: LONG🚀 ☑️ Entry Zone: 💠 84.672 💠 84.486 🌐 Leverage: Cross • 50X ⚡🔥 🎯 Take Profit Targets: 🥇 84.932 🥈 85.103 🥉 85.526 ❌ Stop Loss: 🔴84.272 💎 VIP Signals: @BBB_Support_Team✨
❤4🐳1🤩1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
READY?❤️
❤7🍓1🔥1😍1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🌅 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐳 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 ❤️😍 ☀️ 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐃𝐀𝐘 • 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐒𝐄𝐓𝐔𝐏𝐒 • 𝐍𝐄𝐖 𝐎𝐏𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐄𝐒 🚀 🎯 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐌 • 𝐀𝐕𝐎𝐈𝐃 𝐅𝐎𝐌𝐎 • 𝐖𝐀𝐈𝐓 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 🔥 𝐋𝐄𝐓’𝐒 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐈𝐓 𝐀 𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐓 𝐃𝐀𝐘 ☎️ 𝐕𝐈𝐏: @BBB_Support_Team
☃1🐳1😘1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
3 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 [ 𝗖𝗟𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 ] 3 𝗱𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 [ 𝗖𝗟𝗜𝗖𝗞 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 ]
Signed ZEE | PROMOTER
🚨 𝐁𝐓𝐂/𝐔𝐒𝐃𝐓 🚨 📥𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄 - 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐑𝐓⬇️ 𝑭𝑼𝑳𝑳 𝑺𝑬𝑻𝑼𝑷 𝑫𝑬𝑻𝑨𝑰𝑳𝑺 𝑰𝑺 𝑯𝑬𝑹𝑬 !! 🚨⚠️🌝🌕
Signed ZEE | PROMOTER
SHORT #DEXE/USDT 📉 Full Setup Details Here Join Fast
Signed Atian promoter
🌙❤️ 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓, 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐳 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘❤️🌙 ✨ 𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋, 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐘 𝐅𝐎𝐂𝐔𝐒𝐄𝐃 & 𝐊𝐄𝐄𝐏 𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐍𝐆💯🔥 🚀 𝐓𝐎𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐖 𝐖𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑❤️🔥 🌙 𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐄𝐓 𝐃𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐌𝐒, 𝐁𝐁𝐁𝐳 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘💤❤️ 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐕𝐈𝐏 & 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬👇 ☎️ @BBB_Support_Team 🚀
👍2❤1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
#CRV/USDT Take-Profit target 1 ✅ Profit: 1.4096% 📈 Period: 38 min ⏰
❤2⚡1
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
🧠 CHOOSE YOUR TRADER PERSONALITY ❤️👇🏻
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Boom_Boom_CEO
Showing the 12 most recent of 581 posts we hold for @BBB_Signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@BBB_Signals edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🧠 CHOOSE YOUR TRADER PERSONALITY ❤️👇🏻
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧠 TRADING MINDSET CHECK What hurts a trader more? 👇
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What do you want from BBBz today? 👇
The shares total 165%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧠🔥 WHAT’S YOUR TRADING MOOD TODAY?
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#️⃣ 📊 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐖𝐀𝐓𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐎𝐖? 👀🔥 💎 𝐕𝐎𝐓𝐄 𝐍𝐎𝐖 — 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐋𝐃 𝐖𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐘𝐙𝐄 𝐍𝐄𝐗𝐓? 📈🚀
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊🔥 WHICH COIN DO YOU WANT ME TO ANALYZE FOR LONG-TERM? 🚀
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 581 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boom_Boom_Billionaires” (@BBB_Signals), 40,780 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BBB_Signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.