Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Profit EXPRESS 369

Channel

The Profit EXPRESS 369

@TheProfitExpress_369

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,922subscribers

-790 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001734634717
TypeChannel
Username@TheProfitExpress_369
Description🌹More Details 👉 @MrProfitExpress 🔥We don’t ask your money except VIP fees. No bot fees,No indicator fees,No investment plans. So,Be aware about scammers,Check whether public channel link is available in the Logo correctly.Check every spellings.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheProfitExpress_369

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,92215,71215,3177 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,707 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,698 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,682 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,669 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,657 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,635 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,621 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,600 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,592 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,579 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,566 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,578 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,581 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,569 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,560 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,552 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,562 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,558 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,542 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,537 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,517 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,528 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,500 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,472 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,443 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,420 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,393 subscribers26 September 2026 — 15,300 subscribers4 October 2026 — 15,305 subscribers9 October 2026 — 15,234 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,199 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,178 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,162 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,151 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,141 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,142 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,123 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,116 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,101 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,086 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,075 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,058 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,051 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,049 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,032 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,017 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,998 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,986 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,966 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,959 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,952 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,947 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,935 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,922 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 91 days, net -790. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,804–15,831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:1714,922-13
5 Nov 2026, 01:5914,935-12
3 Nov 2026, 22:5514,947-5
3 Nov 2026, 02:0414,952-7
2 Nov 2026, 00:3914,959-7
1 Nov 2026, 03:1714,966-20
31 Oct 2026, 01:1814,986-12
30 Oct 2026, 04:1914,998-19
29 Oct 2026, 05:2615,017-15
28 Oct 2026, 05:2115,032-17
27 Oct 2026, 02:2815,049-2
26 Oct 2026, 00:5115,051-7
25 Oct 2026, 04:1015,058-17
24 Oct 2026, 05:4815,075-11
23 Oct 2026, 08:4515,086-15
22 Oct 2026, 07:0015,101-15
21 Oct 2026, 00:3615,116-7
19 Oct 2026, 22:3115,123-19
18 Oct 2026, 21:5515,142+1
18 Oct 2026, 01:2715,141first reading

Engagement

172 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.85%
avg views ÷ 14,922 subscribers
Avg views / post
425
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 172 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held172 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total16,135
Reactions total82
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,900
Videos
≈20
Links
≈539

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

335 reactions across 85 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11634.6%
👍9026.9%
🙏6619.7%
❤‍🔥185.37%
💯185.37%
😍185.37%
🍾92.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (7.89%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC289 viewsread 6 November 2026

↗️ $BTC 🚀🚀🚀 For VIP ➤ @MrProfitExpress (TG) ➤ @TheProfitExpress_369 Proper setup shared in VIP

5 Nov 2026, 12:43 UTC392 viewsread 6 November 2026

🏯🚜⚡️🛢 ↗️ $BTC 🚀🚀🚀 For VIP ➤ @MrProfitExpress (TG) ➤ @TheProfitExpress_369 Proper setup shared in VIP

5 Nov 2026, 09:03 UTC432 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Caught exact bottom Back to back profit ➡️Switch to WEEX with more benefits 👇👇 🛍Click to trade on WEEX & get 70% LIFETIME trading fee discount

5 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC344 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartUpdatesPhoto

XRP Update Next move From @ChartUpdates By @MrProfitExpress

5 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC326 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartUpdatesPhoto

SUI Update Next move From @ChartUpdates By @MrProfitExpress

5 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC304 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartUpdatesPhoto

ONDO Update Next move From @ChartUpdates By @MrProfitExpress

5 Nov 2026, 05:02 UTC366 viewsread 6 November 2026

https://t.me/TheProfitExpress_369/49545 ❗️❗️❗️If you are a big trader, this is a massive opportunity for you to save your TRADING FEES... DM me for more info @MrProfitExpress

5 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC324 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ChartUpdatesPhoto

🤑 BTC Update BTC plan From @ChartUpdates By @MrProfitExpress

Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @TheProfitExpress_369. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @TheProfitExpress_369 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TRADINGBYCFAI™
@tradingbycfai · 28,660
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
NOOR CRYPTO
@noorcrypto · 62,958
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
CRYPTO MASTER PRO ®️ (FUTURES TRADING)
@crypto_master_pro_signals · 46,752
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
Binance Future Trading Signals
@binance_signal_future_trading · 24,852
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 September 2026
CGS-CRYPTO GENUINE
@CGScryptoGenuine · 13,721
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
Coin Master
@trading_coin_master · 29,659
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 42,729
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
Champion Traders Academy®
@championtradersclub · 26,687
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 September 2026
МИКС
@AmericanBinanceTradersOfficial · 2
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
ÇRYPTO (BÈAST)™
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 17
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 3 September 2026
CRYPTO MONK
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,467
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
𝗣𝗥𝗢 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 🔰
@Binance_PROs · 33,794
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
Register KFX VIP / VVIP 🇮🇩
@registerkfxvip · 42,574
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
Ai Trend Predictor X | Indicator & Signals
@harmonicshark · 50,680
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
VIP Results (binance 360)
@vip_profits · 22,645
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,799
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Crypto World Updates
@cryptoworld99911 · 7,909
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 September 2026
Crypto Pulse Matrix®
@CryptoPulseMatrix · 16,832
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,515
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 100,936
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,525
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Whales_Pumps
@Whales_Pumps · 53,504
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Redblack Officials
@RedblackOfficials · 31,174
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
CRYPTO 👑 CROWN ™
@crypto_crown_signals · 21,926
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 56 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Profit EXPRESS 369” (@TheProfitExpress_369), 14,922 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheProfitExpress_369.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.