Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coin Master

Channel

Coin Master

@trading_coin_master

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,351subscribers

-1,539 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001811447647
TypeChannel
Username@trading_coin_master
Description- Futures signals - Technical analysis - Trading strategies - Instructions for beginners Admin: @mark_coinmaster
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/trading_coin_master

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@trading_master_channel/5861 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC@trading_coin_master/8773 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@trading_coin_master/8775 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC@trading_master_channel/5882 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@trading_master_channel/5923 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC@trading_coin_master/8779 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@trading_master_channel/5933 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@trading_coin_master/8780 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@trading_master_channel/5975 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC@trading_coin_master/8784 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@trading_master_channel/6016 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC@trading_coin_master/8788 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@trading_master_channel21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@trading_master_channel (210)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 21 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @trading_master_channel. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

31,35132,89032,120.57 August 2026 — 32,890 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,889 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,851 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,812 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,779 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,735 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,705 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,677 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,629 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,566 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,529 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,489 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,430 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,382 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,321 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,278 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,246 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,199 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,169 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,145 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,100 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,066 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,030 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,980 subscribers3 September 2026 — 31,935 subscribers5 September 2026 — 31,834 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,725 subscribers11 September 2026 — 31,625 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,550 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,515 subscribers16 September 2026 — 31,440 subscribers19 September 2026 — 31,351 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,120–33,121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:2131,351-89
16 Sept 2026, 18:1831,440-75
14 Sept 2026, 20:5831,515-35
13 Sept 2026, 09:5931,550-75
11 Sept 2026, 15:5531,625-100
9 Sept 2026, 01:4031,725-109
5 Sept 2026, 18:3731,834-101
3 Sept 2026, 21:0131,935-45
2 Sept 2026, 12:5431,980-50
1 Sept 2026, 12:4532,030-36
31 Aug 2026, 14:0632,066-34
30 Aug 2026, 15:1332,100-45
29 Aug 2026, 18:2432,145-24
28 Aug 2026, 21:5532,169-30
27 Aug 2026, 18:4632,199-30
26 Aug 2026, 21:5332,229-17
26 Aug 2026, 00:4132,246-32
25 Aug 2026, 03:5432,278-43
24 Aug 2026, 01:3532,321-61
22 Aug 2026, 06:3632,382first reading

Engagement

140 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.08%
avg views ÷ 31,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
652
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.312%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 140 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held140 (1 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total46,952
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,050
Videos
16
Links
1,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

272 reactions across 122 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24891.2%
🔥124.41%
👍93.31%
👏31.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC157 viewsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Today VIP Result ================= Total PNL: $1,125 Total signals: 10 Win: 10 Loss: 0 Win rate: 100% Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmaster

21 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC482 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 ETHUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 2,686.72 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +8.65% 📅 Daily change: +1.51% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 2,686.72 · ⬇️ low: 2,381.88 📐 SMA20: 2,593.78 · SMA50: 2,517.55 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: BUY 🟩 • Moving Averages: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Oscillators: NEUTRAL ⚪ • RSI(14): 68.2 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mar

1

21 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC445 views2 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 BTCUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 81,182.00 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +3.24% 📅 Daily change: -0.10% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 81,755.41 · ⬇️ low: 75,644.48 📐 SMA20: 80,299.70 · SMA50: 78,264.51 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: BUY 🟩 • Moving Averages: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Oscillators: NEUTRAL ⚪ • RSI(14): 64.0 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉

2

20 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC474 views2 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Today VIP Result ================= Total PNL: $1,031 Total signals: 10 Win: 10 Loss: 0 Win rate: 100% Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmaster

1👍1

20 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC616 views3 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 QTUMUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 0.962000 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +16.89% 📅 Daily change: +0.63% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 0.987000 · ⬇️ low: 0.811000 📐 SMA20: 0.919550 · SMA50: 0.916780 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Moving Averages: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Oscillators: BUY 🟩 • RSI(14): 63.8 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉

3

20 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC544 views2 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 JTOUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 0.483400 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +10.11% 📅 Daily change: +4.77% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 0.483400 · ⬇️ low: 0.400100 📐 SMA20: 0.447820 · SMA50: 0.439456 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: BUY 🟩 • Moving Averages: BUY 🟩 • Oscillators: BUY 🟩 • RSI(14): 53.3 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmast

2

19 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC574 views3 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Today VIP Result ================= Total PNL: $1,177 Total signals: 10 Win: 10 Loss: 0 Win rate: 100% Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmaster

3

19 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC711 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 CAKEUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 2.4240 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +38.99% 📅 Daily change: +0.25% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 2.4900 · ⬇️ low: 1.7440 📐 SMA20: 2.3528 · SMA50: 2.2847 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: BUY 🟩 • Moving Averages: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Oscillators: BUY 🟩 • RSI(14): 69.2 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmaster

1

19 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC602 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 ARBUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 0.222200 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +156.88% 📅 Daily change: +24.75% 🧭 Trend: Uptrend 📈 (price > SMA20 > SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 0.226200 · ⬇️ low: 0.084300 📐 SMA20: 0.182365 · SMA50: 0.156896 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Moving Averages: STRONG BUY 🟢 • Oscillators: BUY 🟩 • RSI(14): 77.0 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP

1

18 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC596 views2 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Today VIP Result ================= Total PNL: $1,370 Total signals: 10 Win: 10 Loss: 0 Win rate: 100% Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmaster

2

18 Sept 2026, 00:30 UTC710 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 ETHUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 2,440.38 🟢▲ Change (120×4h): +0.16% 📅 Daily change: -0.50% 🧭 Trend: Recovering / Bullish bias 📈 ⬆️ Range high: 2,559.42 · ⬇️ low: 2,381.88 📐 SMA20: 2,438.78 · SMA50: 2,474.55 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: NEUTRAL ⚪ • Moving Averages: BUY 🟩 • Oscillators: NEUTRAL ⚪ • RSI(14): 53.2 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_coinmas

1

18 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC598 views1 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

📊 BTCUSDT — Analysis 💲 Price: 76,417.01 🔴▼ Change (120×4h): -1.56% 📅 Daily change: +0.33% 🧭 Trend: Downtrend 📉 (price < SMA20 < SMA50) ⬆️ Range high: 81,755.41 · ⬇️ low: 75,644.48 📐 SMA20: 76,479.45 · SMA50: 77,068.48 🔎 Technical Rating: • Summary: BUY 🟩 • Moving Averages: BUY 🟩 • Oscillators: BUY 🟩 • RSI(14): 51.1 🤝 Copy Trade: https://coinai.exchange/copy-trading/trader/7666 ⭐ Join VIP 👉 @mark_co

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @trading_coin_master. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Kenzo’s | Trading community
@kenzotradingcommunity · 11,059
#1
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader · 30,915
#2
CRYPTO MAESTRO 🚀 | Profit Signals
@crypto_maestro_trade · 3,521
#3
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,441
#4
We take off (crypto trading)
@vip_signal · 188,444
#5
BinanceMaster ® (Futures/Spot)
@binance_master_prof · 5,849
#6
Infinity Signals
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 76,864
#7
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 194,169
#8
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,205
#9
Whales_Pumps
@Whales_Pumps · 53,359
#10
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 103,956
#11
CRYPTO MAESTRO🚀 | Profit Signals
@Alex_cryptomaestro1st · 5,476
#12
The Profit EXPRESS 369
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 15,393
#13
Crypto Czar | Futures Trading
@CryptoCzarFutures · 2,334
#14
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,504
#15
INSIDERS MEME MASTER 100x
@Insidermeme · 3,880
#16
CRYPTO MONK
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,595
#17
𝖢𝗋𝗒𝗉𝗍𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖲𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗌🚀
@cryptosupersignalss · 2,459
#18
Gnanesh Crypto
@gnaneshtrader · 2,051
#19
CRYPTO HUSTLE
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,844
#20
Crypto Trading Signal
@cryptocurrencyfutureandspot · 7,977
#21
VIP Results (binance 360)
@vip_profits · 22,959
#22
VIP CLUB Feedbacks
@feedbacksmasterVIPclub · 1,063
#23
CGS-CRYPTO GENUINE
@CGScryptoGenuine · 21,413
#24
Sniper kawnai free signal
@sniperkawnai1 · 428
#25
Mudassir Azam Crypto️
@MudassirAzamCrypto · 15,514
#26
Future Master l PUBLIC
@Future_Master_Futures_Ctypto · 377
#27
ARAB_LEAKS_OFFICIAL
@GOLD_STRIKE_AI · 5,863
#28
Global Crypto HUB | FREE
@globalcryptohuboficial · 726
#29
Crypto Capital | Community
@cryptocapitalgl · 47,145
#30
🏆CRYPTO•MILLIONAIRE•CREW⚜️
@CRYPTO_MILLIONAIRE_CREW · 923
#31
crypto signals free
@crypto_pump_free_signal · 6,510
#32
ماستر كريبتو | Master Crypto
@Abonawafcrypto · 6,257
#33
Linda Signals
@linda_signals · 4,092
#34
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,517
#35
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 316,125
#36
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 326,728
#37
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 130,875
#38
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 310,938
#39
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 299,991
#40
CRYPTO (BEAST)™
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,839
#41
WHALES CIRCLE
@WhalesCircle · 40,708
#42
The Gainers Room
@thegainersroom · 918
#43
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 212,651
#44
Crypto Safe Calls™
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,232
#45
Crypto Mermaids
@CryptoMermaids · 33,206
#46
Pika Infinity
@PikaInfinity · 39,881
#47
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 43,706
#48
Crypto Lifer (Futures/Spot)🇵🇷
@cryptoliferr · 8,272
#49
Crypto Heaven®
@CryptoHeaven · 46,388
#50
NOLAN INSIDER
@nolancoinsignals · 14,722
#51
AISH CRYPTO
@AishCrypto · 12,710
#52
M.R TRADER ®️ (Futures & Spot)
@mrtradersignal1 · 4,131
#53
Crypto Bullets 2.0
@Cryptobullets_currencies · 9,436
#54
𝗣𝗥𝗢 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 🔰
@Binance_PROs · 34,230
#55
CRYPTO VARTA
@CryptoVarta · 1,132
#56
THE WOLF (CRYPTO)®
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,064
#57
THE MIDAS TOUCH FUTURES AND SPOT SIGNALS
@Midas_touch_traders · 2,137
#58
MAHEE CRYPTO
@MaheeCrypto · 19,989
#59
Crypto Space
@cryptospace911 · 17,657
#60
Legacy Empire
@legacyempire_offical · 12,209
#61
CPTrading
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,660
#62
DEX Pumps
@dexpumps · 44,609
#63
Alex Friedman | Crypto Future
@AlexFriedmanCrypto · 65,675
#64
Binance Masters ( Spot & Futures )
@BinanceMastersss · 2,178
#65
1
@mattpumps · 10,938
#66
CRYPTO RISE
@Crypto1rise · 7,024 (as read 6 September 2026)
#67
💸🚀MoneyMultiplier🚀💸
@moneymultipliert · 1,324
#68
Zeus Calls | Crypto x100 ⚡️
@zeus_ca1ls · 1,339
#69
GREENFIELD CRYPTO SIGNALS®️
@greenfieldddddd · 2,785
#70
Forex GOLD 🪙 🥇 Future & spot
@samcrypt922 · 269 (as read 6 September 2026)
#71
Future Bull | Market Mastery
@futurebullsignals · 1,262 (as read 6 September 2026)
#72
James Adrian | TRADING 🐋
@TraderAdrians · 3,422
#73
Crypto Academy
@analyspro · 7,424
#74
Invezz Signals™
@InvezzSignals · 810
#75
300✖️FUTURES CRYPTO
@FUTURES300X · 985
#76
Alwegdany Futures Account Management Results
@alwegdanymamegment · 1,074
#77
Daily profit & Learning
@openprofit2023 · 200
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader · 30,915
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coin Master” (@trading_coin_master), 31,351 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trading_coin_master.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.