Your Success is Our Priority 💎 Top-notch futures signals (USDT pairs) 💥 5-8 signals daily 📊 Pro-level technical analysis 🎯 Clear entry, TP, and SL zones 📈 Winning trading strategies 📚 Beginner-friendly instructions ⏱️ 24/7 VIP support 🚀 Up to 700% monthly profit Don’t settle for less—join our VIP and crush the market like a pro! 😎 👉 @SamCrypto_Mastervip

Channel
Crypto Master | Futures Signals
@binancemaster_trader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,991subscribers
-345 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001542812857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @binancemaster_trader |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/binancemaster_trader |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 30,991 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 31,001 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 30,998 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:43 | 31,000 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:08 | 31,020 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 31,042 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 31,047 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 31,057 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 31,038 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 31,033 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 31,031 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 31,048 | -26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 31,074 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 31,078 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 31,098 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 31,112 | -25 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 31,137 | -31 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 31,168 | -34 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 31,202 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 31,220 | first reading |
Engagement
411 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.668%
- avg views ÷ 30,991 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 207
- 352 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 355
- of 411 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 411 (6 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 72,899 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 06s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#MOG +181%
#CRV +298%
#BTCUSDT 4H UPDATE • Market Situation #Bitcoin is moving perfectly according to our roadmap as wave (a) kissed our support zone and delivered a nice 7.79% growth. • Outlook Now price is midway from (a to b) and is expected to make another attempt above 82k level before wave (b) fully finishes. • Key Level The type of reaction we get at the supply zone and the severity, will tell us what we can expect in the nex…
We are Mid Cycle!! Phase 1 - Bitcoin runs.. started in 2022 it is still running albeit after a big mid cycle correct. Now with business cycle rallying and ism numbers up we are starting to see $ETH outperform $BTC. As far as the macro is concerned crypto sits in a similar place to late 2020, before a huge 2021. We are not in 2022 - we are not in a ' 4 year cycle came early' environment. We have rapid expansion …
#BTC closed the week pretty decently, and on the H4 timeframe, price is now moving through the consolidation. The bullish market structure is still intact, and it can move further higher towards the drawn-up resistance area.
💣 UP TO 60% OFF 🔥 VIP ACCESS — RECOVERY DEAL 🔥 —> Last 1 seat Feedbacks : @feedbacksmastervipclub Now Price for VIP membership: 💎 Futures VIP channel: 200$ - 99$ (1 month) 💎 Futures VIP channel: $400 159$ (6 months) 💎 Futures VIP channel: 500$ - 199$ (lifetime) Pay via: USDT (TRC20) 🔰 Admin:@SamCrypto_Mastervip
Step by step, day by day we make a profit, making our VIP members happy. Join us now for a better life tomorrow. 👉 @SamCrypto_Mastervip
#CAKE +617%
#ADA +627%
Sticker, posted without a caption
60% OFF 💵 Futures VIP Channel Monthly Access: $200 → $99 Lifetime Access: $500 → $199 5️⃣ SEATS LEFT 👉 @SamCrypto_Mastervip
Showing the 12 most recent of 411 posts we hold for @binancemaster_trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Market today ….?
- Long62%
- Short42%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Do you want a 70% discount at VIP? 🔥
- Yes97%
- No3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Will it follow August's lead and break the bearish curse?
- 🟢 Yes, the trend is broken — September stays green!60%
- 🔴 No, September will bring the bears back.42%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What will we see BTC first ?
- 85,000 🟢61%
- 72,000 📉39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Waiting for a 50% discount?
- Yes96%
- No4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you want a 70% discount at VIP? 🔥
- Yes93%
- No7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 411 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@feedbacksmasterVIPclub · 1,066#1
@binance_360 · 101,829#2
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529#3
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569#4
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426#5
@kenzotradingcommunity · 11,157#6
@cryptospace911 · 17,831#7
@next10xgem1 · 333,179#8
@Alex_cryptomaestro1st · 5,529#9
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516#10
@vip_signal · 189,716#11
@thewolfcrypto_official · 33,794#12
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703#13
@Official_GCR · 53,141#14
@CryptoCzarFutures · 2,357#15
@BCUSAReal · 148,051#16
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 92,816#17
@crypto_maestro_trade · 3,555#18
@REALCRYPTOBEAST01 · 42,982#19
@binancekillers · 300,874#20
@Binance_PROs · 34,194#21
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 77,648#22
@Whales_Pumps · 52,930#23
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 330,638#24
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,894#25
@vip_profits · 23,056#26
@CryptoInfinitum · 15,081#27
@trading_coin_master · 31,725#28
@thecryptoexpress · 261,006#29
@championcrypto2 · 9,012#30
@Master_of_binanace · 10,766#31
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397#32
@cryptoleaopards · 20,707#33
@maktrading · 15,513#34
@cryptovipsignals120 · 3,644#35
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,798#36
@TheProfitExpress_369 · 15,500#37
@WhalesCircle · 39,898#38
@wiseadvicebysumit · 171,876#39
@Cryptobullets_currencies · 9,541#40
@TCClubb · 3,887#41
@cryptocurrencyfutureandspot · 8,123#42
@cruptonois · 11,839#43
@KPGLOBAL574official · 3,140#44
@AlexFriedmanCrypto · 69,696#45
@CryptoSatRed · 11,600#46
@HunterWolves · 79,677#47
@Binance_Future_Spot_Free_Signals · 11,006#48
@IamBTCT · 15,676#49
@BBB_Signals · 40,753#50
@unstoppablechannel · 2,031#51
@AishCrypto · 12,418#52
@binance_master_prof · 5,896#53
@championtradersclub · 27,987#54
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 21,040#55
@bitcoinbrother · 11,740#56
@tredingprojectfive · 5,798#57
@ForexSafeCalls · 14,873#58
@CryptoHeaven · 46,450#59
@arscryptocalls7 · 131,590#60
@legacyempire_offical · 12,432#61
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,399#62
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,039#63
@Scalping_300 · 43,842#64
@CryptoMermaids · 33,448#65
@uscrypto2 · 11,773#66
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,737#67
@MaheeCrypto · 19,483#68
@greenfieldddddd · 2,835 (as read 6 September 2026)#69
@TraderAdrians · 3,442#70
@thegainersroom · 924#71
@thebull_crypto · 176,069#72
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607#73
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 211,337#74
@Crypto1rise · 7,024 (as read 6 September 2026)#75
@wolfoftrading · 129,736#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AmericanBinanceTradersOfficial · 33,819
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@trading_coin_master · 31,725
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@crypto_master_pro_signals · 46,104
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
@Trading_Signals_Futures_Binance · 28,610
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
@Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 77,648
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@AlexFriedmanCrypto · 69,696
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@RedblackOfficials · 56,598
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Master | Futures Signals” (@binancemaster_trader), 30,991 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binancemaster_trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.