Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trading Crypto Guide ™

Channel

Trading Crypto Guide ™

@TCGFORYOU

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

73,835subscribers

-3,571 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148414624
TypeChannel
Username@TCGFORYOU
CreatedBetween 1 April 2016 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TCGFORYOU

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TCGFORYOU/34750 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29592 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@TCGFORYOU/34751 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29603 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@TCGFORYOU/34753 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29623 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@TCGFORYOU/34754 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29633 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@TCGFORYOU/34757 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29664 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@TCGFORYOU/34758 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR/29674 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Gigantic_Rebirth_GCR19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (19–0)
@HighStakesCap_Official19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (19–0)
@CryptoEmpiresignai14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 daysthis entry (14–0)
@BinanceMasterOfficial6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @TCGFORYOU — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

1 more channel is in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

73,83577,40675,620.56 August 2026 — 77,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,259 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,200 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,127 subscribers11 August 2026 — 77,068 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,017 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76,990 subscribers14 August 2026 — 76,926 subscribers16 August 2026 — 76,826 subscribers17 August 2026 — 76,755 subscribers18 August 2026 — 76,706 subscribers19 August 2026 — 76,618 subscribers20 August 2026 — 76,573 subscribers21 August 2026 — 76,524 subscribers23 August 2026 — 76,439 subscribers24 August 2026 — 76,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 76,316 subscribers26 August 2026 — 76,267 subscribers28 August 2026 — 76,236 subscribers28 August 2026 — 76,177 subscribers30 August 2026 — 76,123 subscribers31 August 2026 — 76,060 subscribers1 September 2026 — 75,991 subscribers2 September 2026 — 75,929 subscribers3 September 2026 — 75,865 subscribers4 September 2026 — 75,793 subscribers7 September 2026 — 75,607 subscribers10 September 2026 — 75,453 subscribers12 September 2026 — 75,366 subscribers14 September 2026 — 75,265 subscribers16 September 2026 — 75,172 subscribers18 September 2026 — 75,033 subscribers25 September 2026 — 74,783 subscribers3 October 2026 — 74,343 subscribers8 October 2026 — 74,118 subscribers12 October 2026 — 73,906 subscribers14 October 2026 — 73,835 subscribers6 August 202614 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 69 days, net -3,571. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,299–77,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 12:4573,835-71
12 Oct 2026, 22:2773,906-212
8 Oct 2026, 08:1674,118-225
3 Oct 2026, 22:0174,343-440
25 Sept 2026, 02:0174,783-250
18 Sept 2026, 23:1775,033-139
16 Sept 2026, 11:3775,172-93
14 Sept 2026, 15:5975,265-101
12 Sept 2026, 23:1575,366-87
10 Sept 2026, 22:3675,453-154
7 Sept 2026, 21:5775,607-186
4 Sept 2026, 20:3675,793-72
3 Sept 2026, 06:3575,865-64
2 Sept 2026, 00:5775,929-62
1 Sept 2026, 00:5775,991-69
31 Aug 2026, 00:5776,060-63
30 Aug 2026, 00:1976,123-54
28 Aug 2026, 22:3476,177-59
28 Aug 2026, 00:5376,236-31
26 Aug 2026, 21:2676,267first reading

Engagement

284 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 73,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
151
of 284 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held284 (1 August 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total1,491,910
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 08:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

14 Oct 2026, 07:19 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

#BTC is moving sideways slowly and building liquidity on both sides. With that, price is still over the support now. Nothing much to happen now, just #CPI today. Avoid trading news and let the market decide with a strong breakout and closing of the day.

13 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

🚨 Bitcoin reserves on exchanges have dropped from 2.8M to 2.67M BTC since February, while $BTC trades around $82,500. 📉 With exchange supply shrinking as prices recover, reduced selling pressure and rising demand could create a bullish setup for Bitcoin’s next move. 📈🚀 🚀

12 Oct 2026, 16:27 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 14 October 2026

A massive green dildo candle is coming for #EDEN! 🚀✌️

12 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

#EDEN on verge of ascending triangle breakout on 4H timeframe Breakout is imminent for #EDEN here✌️🚀

12 Oct 2026, 15:31 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 14 October 2026

#RWA based coins saw massive rally recently due to hype and pumped hard You know what❓ #EDEN is a real-world asset (RWA) platform that bridges traditional finance and decentralized finance and Marketcap under $50M👀 Don't sleep on it guys massive rally is inevitable ✍

12 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Buying #EDEN here https://www.binance.com/en/trade/EDEN_USDT Breakout and retest done on daily timeframe Price holding strong here after breakout from past few days Looks like consolidation phase is over now and massive pump can start anytime 🚀 Short-term targets: 10%-20%-50%-70%-100%

12 Oct 2026, 14:33 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Last week, this report named $84K as the level to hold. Price has since slipped just below it, and a wall of sell orders on the Binance spot book now caps it from above. The wall sits between $85K and $85.5K. It appeared on September 24 and has tripled in size since. Price has pushed into its lower half but never through it. As long as those orders stay in place, the wall is the level that matters most. A sustained…

12 Oct 2026, 11:33 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

#US30 UPDATE: #US30 formed a double bottom after breaking the support area and is now rising. The price broke the resistance trendline, giving a strong break and shift in market structure. Closing shorts and taking longs can be beneficial with low risk.

12 Oct 2026, 10:23 UTCviews —

Trading Crypto Guide ™ pinned «🚀 #TNSR/USDT — 🔥 10%+ GAINS! 📈💰 With 5X leverage, that’s approximately 50%+ potential returns on margin! 🎯🔥 We focus on spotting opportunities, executing timely calls, and delivering results that speak for themselves. Accuracy, timing, and consistency make…»

12 Oct 2026, 10:23 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 14 October 2026

🚀 #TNSR/USDT — 🔥 10%+ GAINS! 📈💰 With 5X leverage, that’s approximately 50%+ potential returns on margin! 🎯🔥 We focus on spotting opportunities, executing timely calls, and delivering results that speak for themselves. Accuracy, timing, and consistency make the difference! 💎 📌 PIN OUR CHANNEL ON TOP 🔝 Stay connected! 👀 A NEW BIG OPPORTUNITY COULD BE NEXT — DON’T MISS THE UPDATES! 🚀

12 Oct 2026, 08:15 UTC≈10,200 viewsread 14 October 2026
Photo

#BTC closed its weekly candle in the middle of the total candle size. That indicates indecision, so wait for the price to move further; it is currently in the middle of the consolidation range.

Showing the 12 most recent of 284 posts we hold for @TCGFORYOU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 17:32 UTCAnonymous Poll140 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. MINA55%
  2. RAD14%
  3. LISTA18%
  4. BB21%
  5. CATI16%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTCAnonymous Poll127 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. NOM9%
  2. ENA56%
  3. NIL11%
  4. BERA17%
  5. STX20%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTCAnonymous Poll222 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. VTHO10%
  2. ASTR19%
  3. OP26%
  4. ARB55%
  5. AWE4%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Poll154 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. BANK27%
  2. ALLO8%
  3. AERO16%
  4. MITO7%
  5. SEI49%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTCAnonymous Poll124 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. TOWN12%
  2. PLUME27%
  3. WLFI38%
  4. T19%
  5. 2Z9%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTCAnonymous Poll121 voters

Choose a Coin For Analysis

  1. SOPH11%
  2. BMT24%
  3. ACE48%
  4. CFG16%
  5. SOMI15%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 284 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,772
#1
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 251,489
#2
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 102,550
#3
Crypto TA King 🐋
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 90,301
#4
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 173,866
#5
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 177,461
#6
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 167,339
#7
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 203,412
#8
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 128,915
#9
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 142,508
#10
CRYPTO GEEK
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,405
#11
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 303,499
#12
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,328
#13
Crypto Safe Calls™
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 132,580
#14
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 139,342
#15
ESTR - EAT SLEEP TRADE REPEAT
@ESTROFFICIAL · 47,637
#16
White Bullss ™
@White_Bullss · 49,072
#17
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 67,785
#18
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,660
#19
CRYPTO HUSTLE
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,599
#20
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 72,548
#21
Cointelegraph
@cointelegraph · 330,788
#22
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 199,770
#23
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 100,045
#24
Global Crypto Research
@Official_GCR · 53,195
#25
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,543
#26
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading
@altcoinsignals · 52,821
#27
CAN | Crypto Analysis
@CryptoANalysis_CAN · 12,257
#28
CRYPTO EASE ™️
@CryptoEase · 5,584
#29
Bitcoin Brother Signals 💯 | Beware Of Scammers
@bitcoinbrother · 14,745
#30
CPTrading
@CoinPulseTrades · 8,488
#31
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · 69,659
#33
PREMIUM 🔐 paid channel
@PremiumPaidChannel · 10,832
#34
Whales Crypto Trading Coach™
@whalestradingcoach · 32,672
#35
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 125,449
#36
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 326,382
#37
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 148,135
#38
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 318,104
#39
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,777,999
#40
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 193,596
#41
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 188,075
#42
Open4profit
@open4profit · 78,450
#43
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 13,605,725
#44
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 102,386
#45
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 101,848
#46
Crypto India Haveli
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 57,628
#47
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,691
#48
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,666
#49
Bitcoin Expert India
@bitcoinexpertindia · 38,194
#50
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,271,388
#51
Crypto Heaven®
@CryptoHeaven · 45,665
#52
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,326,793
#53
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 303,737
#54
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 95,773
#55
Bull Market Maker 🐋
@BullMarketMarker · 24,319 (as read 19 August 2026)
#56
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 37,179
#57
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 298,306
#58
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 58,977
#59
FOREX TALKS
@forextalksbudhil · 7,925
#60
Scalping_300%
@Scalping_300 · 43,189
#61
Crypto Notes
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,524
#62
Whales_Pumps
@Whales_Pumps · 53,354
#63
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 178,246
#64
CRYPTO TALKS
@CryptoTalksBudhil · 87,246
#65
Crypto Jargon
@cryptojargon69 · 36,232
#66
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 7,508,047
#67
Earn With Sapna
@EarnWithSapna · 48,140
#68
Crypto King Keyur
@CryptoKingKeyur · 635,178
#69
Boom_Boom_Billionaires
@BBB_Signals · 40,285
#70
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 37,237
#71
CCC.io
@cccio · 33,283
#72
Crypto Empire Signal™
@CryptoEmpire_Signal · 27,152
#73
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳
@whalebotalerts · 143,282
#74
Crypto With Khan
@startfromzerofamily · 43,591
#75
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 93,838
#76
Rose VIP Signal 🌹
@RoseVipSignal · 18,592
#77
The Rich Trader Reborn 🐋
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 25,387
#78
Backcom.io Global
@BackcomGlobal · 25,215
#79
CPH Updates
@CryptoPointHi · 29,334
#80
Whale Sniper
@WhaleSniper · 59,819
#81
Jack Dorsey Coins 🚀
@JackDorseyCoins · 21,953
#82
WazirX Announcements
@wazirx · 98,050
#83
BullFrog Crypto
@BullFrogCrypto · 19,828
#84
Crypto Mermaids
@CryptoMermaids · 32,642
#85
CRYPTO-200%-EARNING
@Crypto200Earning · 12,662
#86
Bitcoin Embassy Official 📉📈
@Bitcoin_Embassy_Official0 · 15,327
#87
Crypto Waves
@BinanceWaves · 21,075
#88
Delbert's Trading Team
@delbert_trading · 5,832
#89
premium binance signals turkey
@premimumbinancesignalsturkey · 16,246
#90
We take off (crypto trading)
@vip_signal · 186,787
#91
CryptoQuant Alert
@cryptoquant_alert · 70,508
#92
unfolded.
@unfolded · 116,642
#93
PushpendraSinghOfficial
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,716
#94
everything hindi
@everythingajay · 44,235
#95

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,772
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Trading Coach
@tradingcoach · 69,659
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading
@altcoinsignals · 52,821
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Tiger's™
@Crypto_Tigers1 · 26,328
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 251,489
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Profit Coach™
@cryptoprofitcoach · 26,468
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO
@TheAnalystCrypto · 68,523
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Dr. Crypto | Free Signals 👨🏻‍⚕️
@drcrypto_trading · 29,380
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Analytics Insight
@analyticsinsightmag · 34,093
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
CRYPTO CLASSICS
@CryptoClassics · 115,966
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 177,461
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 199,770
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Signals ©
@whalescryptovip · 203,412
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒
@PAIDROSE · 139,342
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹
@RosePremiumm · 142,508
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 95,810
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 125,449
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Coin Signals
@Coin_Signals · 72,548
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 173,866
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
CoinCodeCap Classic
@coincodecap · 25,361
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ✅ ®
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 18,772
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Forex Tradings
@Forex_Tradings · 19,540
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐌𝐄
@CryptoNavigationPrime · 52,274
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto News
@news_crypto · 100,045
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 159 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trading Crypto Guide ™” (@TCGFORYOU), 73,835 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TCGFORYOU.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.