We believe in technical analysis and fundamental analysis. We always try to give best analysis based on charts and upcoming events. Always do your own research. Educational stuff only.
#crypto #PUMP #Kucoin #Binance #Signal #pumps #Btc
Support: @TCG4YOU
Created
Between 1 March 2017 and 31 May 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @TCGFORYOU — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
19 measurements spanning 19 days, net -1,043. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76,207–77,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 20:54
76,363
-76
23 Aug 2026, 05:13
76,439
-85
21 Aug 2026, 13:52
76,524
-49
20 Aug 2026, 12:46
76,573
-45
19 Aug 2026, 14:43
76,618
-88
18 Aug 2026, 12:54
76,706
-49
17 Aug 2026, 14:55
76,755
-71
16 Aug 2026, 08:52
76,826
-100
14 Aug 2026, 23:07
76,926
-64
13 Aug 2026, 11:38
76,990
-27
12 Aug 2026, 13:24
77,017
-51
11 Aug 2026, 13:35
77,068
-59
10 Aug 2026, 15:45
77,127
-73
9 Aug 2026, 16:22
77,200
-59
8 Aug 2026, 16:22
77,259
-60
7 Aug 2026, 16:35
77,319
-47
6 Aug 2026, 14:00
77,366
-40
6 Aug 2026, 04:00
77,406
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:55
77,406
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 76,363 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,700
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
71
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
71 (1 August 2026 – 24 August 2026)
Views total
760,900
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,350
Videos
≈5
Links
≈366
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#US30 UPDATE:
#US30 broke below and actually gave a strong bounce from the consolidation support area. Expecting more moves to come after the successful break of 53,500.
#BTC closed the week very strong and is now making a new higher high. That is a clean, all-timeframes bullish signal; there is no reason to take counter sells until the price reaches $81,500 and $82,200.
#DXY gave a clean shot below the zone, which leads to strong movement in the market as seen. Now, the move yet to come, if no other news factor influences it.
#BTC WEEKLY TF UPDATE:
#BTC had a very strong move up and a very bullish candle straight to the resistance around $78,150. If today's candle closes this strongly, expect a shallow retracement followed by another leg up. Therefore, the week might include a retracement phase.
Here's the Analysis of #MANTA:
#MANTA is missing both sides of the key support and resistance area around $0.050 and $0.16, respectively. Still, it can go lower, so we are taking short-selling as our advantage.
#TOTAL UPDATE:
#TOTAL had a very strong rise in inflow and goes straight into [resistance], likely getting rejected too. Well, if price starts breaking the resistance again, then we can have the market pump in the market.
#BITCOIN DAILY TF UPDATE:
#BITCOIN played the Inverse Head & Shoulder pattern perfectly and had a healthy breakout of the resistance. The next major area is $84,500 - $85,000.
The cost of downside protection collapsed to almost nothing on July 21, the same session Bitcoin printed its local high after a run up off the June low. Hedges were sold into the top, and the deleveraging that came with the rally left the market leaning into the move that followed.
#BTC gave a clean break of the resistance area and had a retest. Price is still shooting higher, and the next key area is at the $82,000 mark. Currently, price is sitting at minor resistance, so it might be a small rejection area.
US spot ETF flows turned positive in the middle of July and turned straight back within the week. Net flows are modestly negative again, and set against the redemption waves of June and early July the current outflow barely registers.
The institutional channel is not selling this market down, and it is not buying it up either. Persistence rather than size was the thing to watch after last week's flip, and it did not…
#ATOM gave a break and retest of the resistance line, and now it is a good range for the drawn resistance area, which is a 10.7% trading range.
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @TCGFORYOU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 596,763 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto VIP Signal @CryptoVIPsignalTA · 324,078 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Trading Coach @tradingcoach · 71,208 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading @altcoinsignals · 55,164 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
The Crypto Express @thecryptoexpress · 265,958 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
CRYPTO CLASSICS @CryptoClassics · 78,820 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™ @CryptoRROFFICAIL · 184,045 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official® @wallstreetqueenofficial · 198,282 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒 @PAIDROSE · 145,005 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Premium Signals 🌹 @RosePremiumm · 148,054 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading @Wallstreetcryptotrader · 111,327 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Wolf of Trading® @wolfoftrading · 131,304 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Coin Signals @Coin_Signals · 74,023 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 177,574 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto News @news_crypto · 98,663 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
White Bullss ™ @White_Bullss · 51,533 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
CryptoBullet @cryptobullet · 68,112 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Only Trades @OnlyTradesX · 76,195 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™ @arscryptocalls7 · 132,952 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto TA King 🐋 @Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 93,943 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Rose 🌹 @rose · 85,863 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Planet Calls™ @CryptoPlanetCalls · 105,095 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
Ash Crypto @AshCryptoTG · 60,384 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Coin Bureau @CoinBureau · 118,492 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading Crypto Guide ™” (@TCGFORYOU), 76,363 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TCGFORYOU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
