We provide only technical based charts here for alts coins as well as btc
Best Channel for Crypto News & Signals.
Not an Investment Advice
Do your Own RESEARCH always
Advertising/Premium:- @Bullss_Admin
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @White_Bullss — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -4,893. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,043–53,404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:06
47,777
-58
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
47,835
-51
3 Nov 2026, 09:58
47,886
-54
2 Nov 2026, 09:27
47,940
-52
1 Nov 2026, 08:20
47,992
-73
31 Oct 2026, 07:10
48,065
-78
30 Oct 2026, 07:55
48,143
-66
29 Oct 2026, 10:46
48,209
-76
28 Oct 2026, 12:16
48,285
-58
27 Oct 2026, 14:39
48,343
-48
26 Oct 2026, 15:49
48,391
-36
25 Oct 2026, 18:30
48,427
-43
24 Oct 2026, 14:58
48,470
-54
23 Oct 2026, 14:20
48,524
-35
22 Oct 2026, 16:48
48,559
-72
21 Oct 2026, 09:09
48,631
-78
20 Oct 2026, 03:58
48,709
-37
19 Oct 2026, 06:00
48,746
-76
18 Oct 2026, 03:41
48,822
-56
17 Oct 2026, 00:19
48,878
first reading
Engagement
243 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 47,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,600
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 243 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
243 (26 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
324,599
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,460
Videos
≈120
Links
≈798
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 243 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @White_Bullss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 243 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (20.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Bitcoin gained 3.6% today as crude oil dropped 8.7%.
• Inverse correlation rarely lasts
• Both moved together June to Oct
Bitcoin has drivers of its own!
⚖️ Trading activity declined in October, with spot and futures volumes falling. The dominance of altcoin open interest fell from approximately 1.0 at the beginning of October to 0.76 by the end of the month.
💰 USDT Dominance (USDT.D).
This is one of the key charts that could determine the market’s future direction.
We are currently seeing USDT dominance approach the key resistance level of 7%. If dominance fails to break through this level and remains below it, this will signal the start of a correction. The main target for the upcoming decline is the previous low at 6.5%.
If dominance declines according to my trading…
Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @White_Bullss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 6 posts on @White_Bullss as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CryptoFlash⚡️— blockchain, news, investments @cryptoflash_news · 219,147 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 September 2026
Backcom.io Global @BackcomGlobal · 22,904 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Whales Crypto Trading Coach™ @whalestradingcoach · 31,801 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋 @next10xgem1 · 321,940 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
BitCoin Cryptosystem @bitcoin_Crypto19 · 21,549 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
Crypto Tiger's™ @Crypto_Tigers1 · 25,907 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Money - Crypto Investments @Invest_Crypto19 · 21,277 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
Zuriplay @Tom_Cat_Coin · 20,371 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
CRYPTO CLASSICS @CryptoClassics · 110,964 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
BitCoin Cryptosystem @Crypto_Market12 · 21,362 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Fast Keno @Update_Binance · 21,533 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 September 2026
Trading Crypto Guide ™ @TCGFORYOU · 74,517 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Habesha FX @Airdrop_Lists1 · 21,802 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 September 2026
Rose Premium Signal 🌹 @PremiumRoseSignal · 102,716 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Altcoin & Bitcoin Trading @altcoinsignals · 51,747 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Adsince @Adsince · 21,012 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
Cryptology X @cryptologyxsignals · 15,870 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 September 2026
Scalping_300% @Scalping_300 · 42,729 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋 @BCUSAReal · 145,432 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Rose Paid Crypto Free ™🔒 @PAIDROSE · 137,149 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals) @VikingsAnalyst · 36,828 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™ @arscryptocalls7 · 126,818 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
CRYPTO 👑 CROWN ™ @crypto_crown_signals · 21,926 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
Crypto VIP ЯR ™ @CryptoRROFFICAIL · 174,556 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“White Bullss ™” (@White_Bullss), 47,777 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/White_Bullss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.