Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 81 days, net -11,507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163,802–178,761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 14:10
165,528
-107
24 Oct 2026, 14:50
165,635
-163
23 Oct 2026, 13:41
165,798
-150
22 Oct 2026, 15:00
165,948
-198
21 Oct 2026, 09:46
166,146
-194
20 Oct 2026, 04:10
166,340
-158
19 Oct 2026, 01:31
166,498
-200
18 Oct 2026, 02:41
166,698
-179
17 Oct 2026, 02:38
166,877
-134
16 Oct 2026, 03:50
167,011
-174
15 Oct 2026, 00:46
167,185
-154
13 Oct 2026, 19:08
167,339
-367
10 Oct 2026, 07:17
167,706
-394
6 Oct 2026, 02:40
168,100
-782
30 Sept 2026, 19:15
168,882
-1,457
18 Sept 2026, 09:18
170,339
-307
16 Sept 2026, 04:59
170,646
-242
14 Sept 2026, 14:21
170,888
-239
13 Sept 2026, 03:55
171,127
-323
11 Sept 2026, 02:56
171,450
first reading
Engagement
1,247 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.39%
avg views ÷ 165,528 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,960
388 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.386%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
393
of 1,247 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 385 of 388 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
1,247 (5 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
1,535,266
Reactions total
5,889
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 13:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 02s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,622 reactions across 908 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,523
56.1%
👍
2,805
24.1%
🔥
1,005
8.65%
😱
849
7.31%
🤩
326
2.81%
🎉
114
0.981%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 922 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,622 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hcs2wFFU0E
1st Week Results from Our Claude Bots Are Out Now !
We Made $2700 on Claude AI Bots this week And You Can Copy Our Bots As Well Now as All is live on Our Website !
It took 90 days and 600 Hours of study to reach where we are not just take advantage guys everything for now is Free after 1-2 months only users who supported at begin might get it FREE !
2 positions profits booked on PUMP CATCHER ON BITUNIX AND BLOFIN FOR TODAY ON $1000 account !
Congrats guys time to PRINT MONEY NOW WHILE WE ARE SLEEPING 🔥🔥🧿🧿🧿
RUNNING TRADES TODAY ON OUR PUMP CATCHER STRATEGY ON BITUNIX AND BLOFIN !
All on AUTO - NO NEED TO EVEN PRESS 1 BUTTON AFTER YOU CLICK COPY OUR BOT ! 🔥🔥🧿🧿🧿
💰 Chamath Palihapitiya says AI could hack Satoshi’s Bitcoin wallet and send $BTC to zero.
📱 https://x.com/wiseadvicesumit/status/2114220616924455329
JOIN FREE VIP GROUP - @ALPHAWDBOT
You Can join Our Telegram Group for Free which have all Bots and all Access for free - @ALPHAWDBOT
And Can copy straight our Bots on your Accounts for Free as well on
https://wiseadvicetrades.com/
This is WiseAdvice All In Bot On Our Website Which we explained in Today video and these are LIVE 15 trades which Anyone can track On Website as our trade history are Live on Website on Our Bots .
In Last 15 trades we have made 115% Profit on WiseAdvice All In !
This strategy works best on all 3 exchanges Weex , Bitunix and BLofin !
🗳Votes have reset today.
Please take 1 minute and vote for me as Community Influencer at Binance Blockchain100 2026 🙏 ⭐️
➡️Vote for me here: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cact26user/118?uc=app_square_share_link&us=copylink
Thank you, fam ❤️
You Can join Our Telegram Group for Free which have all Bots and all Access for free - @ALPHAWDBOT
And Can copy straight our Bots on your Accounts for Free as well on
https://wiseadvicetrades.com/
👍10🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,247 posts we hold for @wiseadvicebysumit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@wiseadvicebysumit edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
21 October 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🇺🇸20 Minutes Left for US CPI Data.
💰What do you think, how will Bitcoin react?🤔
Bitcoin will pump 🔼29%
Bitcoin will dump 🔽52%
High Volatility 🕯16%
No Major Move ⌛9%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🇺🇸 U.S. jobs data drops in 30 minutes (6PM IST).
💰How will Bitcoin react?
Bitcoin pumps 🚀40%
Bitcoin dumps 🔽33%
Big volatility 🕯19%
No Major Move ⌛13%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🇺🇸30 Minutes Left for US PCE Data.
What do you think, how will markets react?🤔
Markets will pump 🔼39%
Markets will dump 🔽32%
No Major Move ⌛14%
High Volatility 🕯20%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🇺🇸20 Minutes Left for US CPI Data.
What do you think, how will markets react?🤔
Markets will pump 🔼41%
Markets will dump 🔽36%
No Major Move ⌛11%
High Volatility 🕯18%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚨10 minutes left for the U.S. economic data release.
How do you think the Bitcoin will react? 🤔
Bitcoin pumps🔼24%
Bitcoin dumps🔽57%
Volatile both ways🕯13%
No major impact⌛10%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 22 August 2026 to 25 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Profit Coach™ @cryptoprofitcoach · 26,869 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Earn With Sapna @EarnWithSapna · 47,832 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
CRYPTO AMAN @cryptoamanclub · 101,579 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
Cryptopolitan @CryptopolitanOfficial · 24,366 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
CPH Updates @CryptoPointHi · 29,160 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Bitcoin Expert India @bitcoinexpertindia · 37,979 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto Notes @cryptoNotesMohsin · 50,110 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Jargon @cryptojargon69 · 36,086 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals) @VikingsAnalyst · 37,023 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
Free Crypto Signals - SmartViewAi.com @SmartViewAI · 44,869 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
Waqar Zaka @waqarzaka · 205,890 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
WazirX Announcements @wazirx · 97,302 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Crypto VIP Signal @CryptoVIPsignalTA · 317,678 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Sujal Jethwani @Sujaljethwani · 19,676 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
The Bitcoin @TheBitcoin537 · 19,477 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Crypto Empire Signal™ @CryptoEmpire_Signal · 26,995 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Chiefs - @chiefrafba @cryptochiefss · 27,024 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Ajoobz News @AjoobzNews · 45,555 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Waqar Zaka Group 📊 @waqarzaka_channel · 194,569 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Ash Crypto @AshCryptoTG · 58,800 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Binance Signals TURKEY🎖🚀 @binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,278 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
Crypto Patel @OfficialCryptoPatel · 24,662 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
CCC.io @cccio · 33,033 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
Whales Crypto Guide @Whalesguide · 191,060 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 261 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wise Advice Signal” (@wiseadvicebysumit), 165,528 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wiseadvicebysumit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.