Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Shyam

Channel

Crypto Shyam

@cryptoshyamcs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,665subscribers

-4,910 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512245444
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoshyamcs
DescriptionOfficial ID :- @cryptoshyam_cs Youtuube channel :- https://www.youtube.com/c/CryptoShyam All Social Media Links :- https://linktr.ee/cryptoshyam
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoshyamcs

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,66525,03120,8487 August 2026 — 21,575 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,520 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,488 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,463 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,426 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,411 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,392 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,364 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,304 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,280 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,270 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,248 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,243 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,214 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,003 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,879 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,813 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,388 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,124 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,954 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,581 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,271 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,924 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,357 subscribers9 September 2026 — 21,507 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,078 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,559 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,138 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,732 subscribers26 September 2026 — 18,018 subscribers4 October 2026 — 25,031 subscribers9 October 2026 — 24,687 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,159 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,973 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,846 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,754 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,552 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,461 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,365 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,163 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,030 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,833 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,712 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,540 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,449 subscribers27 October 2026 — 22,236 subscribers28 October 2026 — 22,092 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,898 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,733 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,112 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,034 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,960 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,813 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,693 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,665 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -4,910. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,410–26,286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 07:3616,665-28
4 Nov 2026, 08:4516,693-120
3 Nov 2026, 08:0616,813-147
2 Nov 2026, 07:3916,960-74
1 Nov 2026, 08:2017,034-78
31 Oct 2026, 08:1517,112-4,621
30 Oct 2026, 05:4721,733-165
29 Oct 2026, 05:5121,898-194
28 Oct 2026, 02:4122,092-144
27 Oct 2026, 00:5522,236-213
25 Oct 2026, 21:4622,449-91
24 Oct 2026, 23:2022,540-172
23 Oct 2026, 20:1722,712-121
22 Oct 2026, 18:0822,833-197
21 Oct 2026, 14:3423,030-133
20 Oct 2026, 14:1823,163-202
19 Oct 2026, 13:2023,365-96
18 Oct 2026, 15:3623,461-91
17 Oct 2026, 15:1723,552-202
16 Oct 2026, 15:4023,754first reading

Engagement

320 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.14%
avg views ÷ 16,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
524
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.481%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 320 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 68 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held320 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total68,130
Reactions total177
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,900
Videos
≈250
Links
≈5,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 16s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 144 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16346.3%
🔥8825.0%
👍5014.2%
😱133.69%
😁82.27%
👌71.99%
🤩71.99%
🤔61.70%
💔41.14%
🙊30.852%
❤‍🔥10.284%
👏10.284%
😭10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 27 of 131 posts held from the last 30 days (20.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC254 viewsread 5 November 2026

JUST IN: Binance founder CZ says banks may be more vulnerable to cyberattacks than crypto exchanges.

3 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC665 viewsread 5 November 2026

https://www.instagram.com/p/DfRxaESEalM/?img_index=8&exln=MTJkbmQ0emFvZm1xcw==

2 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC631 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

An amazing evening at the Binance KOL Dinner during India Blockchain Week 2026! 🟡 Great conversations, meaningful connections, and quality time with some of the top creators and influential voices in India's crypto ecosystem. https://x.com/CryptoShyam/status/2117179166156095708?a=9ToeVyYuO2sEatuRTO0&s=20

👍2

2 Nov 2026, 05:40 UTC542 viewsread 5 November 2026

🚨 BREAKING: BTCPAY SERVER HOT WALLETS REPORTEDLY DRAINED IN MULTIPLE ATTACKS! 🔴 Reports indicate that several BTCPay Server hot wallets have been compromised, resulting in suspected fund losses. ⚠️ URGENT SECURITY ALERT: Users are being advised to shut down their BTCPay Server instances immediately to prevent potential further losses. 🔐 Crypto users are urged to prioritize wallet security and monitor official upda…

2 Nov 2026, 04:54 UTC527 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Xento × Trench $20,000 Rewards Campaign 🔥 | Complete Guide in Hindi | CryptoShyam #xentoquests https://youtu.be/FqXmgVO9YyQ https://youtu.be/FqXmgVO9YyQ https://youtu.be/FqXmgVO9YyQ https://youtu.be/FqXmgVO9YyQ https://youtu.be/FqXmgVO9YyQ DONT MISS GUYS MUST WATCH AND EARN THIS REWARD🔥🫡

31 Oct 2026, 07:09 UTC703 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Chainalysis Got Hacked The crypto tracking firm itself suffered a security breach. An attacker reportedly used “offensive agentic techniques” to access customer names, email addresses and role labels.

❤5

30 Oct 2026, 05:50 UTC773 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 NORTH KOREA'S TRADERTRAITOR (A LAZARUS GROUP UNIT) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE $6.3 BILLION BINANCE HACK, THE BIGGEST CRYPTO HEIST IN HISTORY.

😱7❤6

30 Oct 2026, 05:45 UTC≈1,130 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🚀 BITBASE WELCOME BONUS — UP TO 10,520 USDT! 🎁 #CryptoShyam community, a new limited-time campaign is LIVE! 🔥 ✅ Sign up using my referral link 💰 Deposit 100 USDT+ 📈 Complete futures trading tasks 🎁 Unlock welcome rewards, position vouchers & futures bonuses! 🔥 Extra rewards: • First trade: Up to 500 USDT Position Airdrop campaign • Deposit & trade tasks: Additional futures bonuses • Trading milestones: Rewards up …

❤2

30 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC577 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🚨 BINANCE HACK? $5.6 BILLION REPORTEDLY MOVED! Reports claim Binance wallets lost billions across ETH, USDT and USDC. 🔴 $5.6B reportedly moved out 🔒 $2.37B reportedly frozen 📉 BTC crashed $2,500 in minutes ⚠️ Massive questions over Binance's security. CZ says: “It does look like a hack.” Is this a major crisis for Binance? #Binance #CryptoNews #Bitcoin #CryptoHack

❤1

29 Oct 2026, 21:39 UTC729 views0 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Outcome: is it bullish? probably yes. We got that liquidity wipe out. Bitcoin is holding strong.

Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @cryptoshyamcs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@cryptoshyamcs edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

General Science With Neeraj Sir
@general_science_with_neeraj_Sir · 50,500
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto Notes
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,579
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Universe
@shivamcryptouniverse · 56,593
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto With Khan
@startfromzerofamily · 42,958
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 163,671
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
CRYPTO AMAN
@cryptoamanclub · 100,727
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Shyam” (@cryptoshyamcs), 16,665 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoshyamcs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.