Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,969. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,236–44,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 14:55
42,531
-30
5 Nov 2026, 13:28
42,561
-19
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
42,580
-34
3 Nov 2026, 09:51
42,614
-32
2 Nov 2026, 07:16
42,646
-31
1 Nov 2026, 04:18
42,677
-18
31 Oct 2026, 04:20
42,695
-16
30 Oct 2026, 06:19
42,711
-38
29 Oct 2026, 05:37
42,749
-23
28 Oct 2026, 02:38
42,772
-30
27 Oct 2026, 00:57
42,802
-16
25 Oct 2026, 23:46
42,818
-13
25 Oct 2026, 00:16
42,831
-19
23 Oct 2026, 22:06
42,850
-25
22 Oct 2026, 20:38
42,875
-45
21 Oct 2026, 17:36
42,920
-28
20 Oct 2026, 13:41
42,948
-23
19 Oct 2026, 12:14
42,971
-29
18 Oct 2026, 12:30
43,000
-16
17 Oct 2026, 14:30
43,016
first reading
Engagement
423 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 42,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,420
124 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.608%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
127
of 423 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
423 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
672,350
Reactions total
4,090
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 20:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,400
Videos
≈289
Links
≈11,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,488 reactions across 412 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,684
46.6%
🔥
4,470
27.1%
💯
1,751
10.6%
👍
960
5.82%
😢
775
4.70%
😱
211
1.28%
🫡
200
1.21%
💔
169
1.02%
🤯
144
0.873%
🐳
65
0.394%
😍
59
0.358%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 412 of the 423 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,488 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 423 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
40
of 412 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sageairdrops. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 423 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 127 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📣 Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin, policy strategist Tanvi Ratna, and Gnosis co-founder Friederike Ernst recently visited the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
Why This Is Good News 🚀
Active Dialogue: High-level discussions between global Web3 founders and central bank regulators signal a shift toward constructive engagement and mutual understanding.
Focus on Policy: Having policy experts involved helps bridge the gap…
📣 FUNGO Labs NFT Sealed Auction is LIVE! ✔️
⏱ Ending in just 8 hours!
⬇️ Want to participate? Check out the detailed guide below to understand how the Sealed Auction works and how to place your bid
📱 Post : https://x.com/Crypto_SunnyS/status/2118610944989479167
🚨 FUNGO LABS NFT MINT is LIVE
Mint is Live for Whitelisted Users
🔗 Link : https://fungolabs.org/launchpad/d/fungo-genesis
💵 marketplace : https://opensea.io/collection/fungogenesis
📣 SAGE DISCORD INVITES ARE LIVE! 💚
Finally, we have generated the invite link
We have only 100 invites, so make sure to join before they run out.
⚠️ Only active members are welcome. If you're not active, you will be kicked.
Don't forget to participate!
Join the Discord, stay active, and grab your opportunity, SAGE fam!
📱 Join here: Completed ..
🚨 Be Ready!
Discord access is limited to just 100 members on a First Come, First Served (FCFS) basis.
⏱ The invite link will drop at exactly 3 PM IST (in 5 minutes).
Make sure you're ready. Don't miss out! 🔥
📣 SAGE DISCORD IS OPENING AGAIN! 💚
We are opening 100 new invites for the SAGE community on Discord.
But remember, this is only for ACTIVE members. If you're not active in the server, you will be kicked. We want real and active members who contribute to the community.
Join the SAGE Discord, stay active, and participate in the giveaway.
Let's grow together, SAGE fam! 💚
📱 YouTube AMA Plan kar raha hu after so Long
Jo bhi aapko Puchna hai puch sakte ho so Apne Questions Ready Rakhna ..
The AMA date and time will be announced soon.
📣 FungoLabs NFT Mint Details Revealed!
NFT Supply Breakdown:
• 3,232 Total NFTs
• 500 FREE Whitelist Mints
• 2,500 Public Auction Mints
• 232 Team NFTs
Mint Date: November 5
⬇️ How the Public Auction Works
📱 More Info : https://x.com/Crypto_SunnyS/status/2118034592137625818
🚨 BIG NEWS FOR PERP DEXs!
Make sure to read this update if you're already grinding Perp DEXs or planning to join one. This development could open up new opportunities for the entire Perp DEX ecosystem.
📱 Post : https://x.com/Crypto_SunnyS/status/2117892861161279686
❤20🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 423 posts we hold for @sageairdrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@sageairdrops edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❓ Quiz #39
You receive an email saying you won a crypto reward. You click the link, and the website asks for your wallet seed phrase to claim it. What should you do?
A. Enter the seed phrase to claim the reward15%
B. Share only the first 6 words3%
C. Close the website and report it as a scam78%
D. Try the website with a different wallet4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❓ Quiz #35
What makes an NFT different from a regular cryptocurrency token? 👀
A. NFTs are always more expensive 💰8%
B. Each NFT can have unique properties and is not necessarily interchangeable with another NFT 🖼88%
C. NFTs cannot exist on blockchains ⛓️3%
D. NFTs are always used only for gaming 🎮2%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 423 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Movewiffrens Updates @movewiffrens · 31,647 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
Pranjal | Airdrop Adventure 🧭 @AirdropAdventureYT · 21,665 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@SONUCRYPTO @sonucryptoyoutube · 20,258 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
Alpha Farm @alphapham · 32,938 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
GA Crypto @GaCryptOfficial · 36,232 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
Slinky Announcements @slinkylayer_ann · 38,738 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️ @cryptogg · 102,081 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
DS Bihari [Official] - 👀 Check Username Before Join @workwithdileep · 24,505 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 September 2026
StableJack Announcement @stablejack · 39,213 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Danish talk @DanishYT2255 · 24,101 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
Dill Announcement @dill_announcement · 50,968 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Free me Jankari @freemejankari · 46,732 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
Wyck of Web3 Alpha @teddyalphas · 73,374 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Plume @PlumeNetwork · 165,118 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Ⓜ️Airdrop Alert Daily Youtube Channel™ @AirdropAlertDaily · 19,515 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 September 2026
Wimar.X @WimarX · 40,234 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Feature earning @feature_earning · 58,036 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
CryptoNinjas News @cryptoninjas_news_ann · 20,559 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Prom @prom_ann · 21,177 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
Earn by Abhi (Crypto) @EarnByAbhi23 · 30,542 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
NEW AIRDROPS VERIFIED @new_airdropss · 40,581 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Tricks By Tricky Sharmaji @trickysharmajii · 18,725 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 October 2026
Prime Airdrops - Crypto @PrimeAirdrops_official · 21,689 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
Morph Layer Announcement @MorphL2announcement · 590,306 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 103 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAGE AIRDROPS” (@sageairdrops), 42,531 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sageairdrops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.