Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 58 days, net -5,181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,792–82,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 16:58
76,569
-681
26 Sept 2026, 16:37
77,250
-693
17 Sept 2026, 14:59
77,943
-154
15 Sept 2026, 16:18
78,097
-179
14 Sept 2026, 00:39
78,276
-161
12 Sept 2026, 06:01
78,437
-193
9 Sept 2026, 22:41
78,630
-321
6 Sept 2026, 19:14
78,951
-236
4 Sept 2026, 09:17
79,187
-148
2 Sept 2026, 20:28
79,335
-70
1 Sept 2026, 21:09
79,405
-131
31 Aug 2026, 23:16
79,536
-55
31 Aug 2026, 00:04
79,591
-101
30 Aug 2026, 00:07
79,692
-111
28 Aug 2026, 23:05
79,803
-103
27 Aug 2026, 23:23
79,906
-45
27 Aug 2026, 00:48
79,951
-77
25 Aug 2026, 23:41
80,028
-88
25 Aug 2026, 00:58
80,116
-150
23 Aug 2026, 11:37
80,266
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.37%
avg views ÷ 76,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,820
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
33 (3 February 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
5,450
Reactions total
70
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 14:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈2
Links
≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
487 reactions across 30 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
215
44.1%
❤
192
39.4%
🤝
20
4.11%
😁
19
3.90%
❤🔥
16
3.29%
🤗
8
1.64%
🔥
7
1.44%
😭
5
1.03%
💯
4
0.821%
⚡
1
0.205%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 487 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I’ve been testing BaiBai for some of my trades on Base.
Just swapped 0.21 ETH for 493.148 ZRO.
BaiBai quoted the trade at $580.40 and showed it as the best price available at the time.
What I like so far is that I don’t have to open Uniswap, Aerodrome and another tab just to figure out where I’m getting the better fill.
It checks its own liquidity first, then routes elsewhere on Base if another venue can fill the…
Just got $409 just for signing up on world_xyz
Not sure what the criteria is, but you can check it out as well:
- Go to: https://world.xyz/?ref=DR8P378H
- Signup with your gmail
- Fund your wallet with $3
- Carry out a trade
- then you'd be credited with FREE money
Goodluck.
ZecBit went from a free mint to as high as 1.5 $ZEC, and it’s still sitting around 0.5 ZEC floor.
So naturally, I’ve started paying more attention to other NFT projects on Zcash.
Two I’m watching right now:
→ zksnarks_
→ Playboyzpro
Here’s how to apply for their WL:
1. zksnarks_
This one already has my attention because they’re minting on Zcash after seeing what ZecBit was able to do.
→ WL: zksnarks.net/snarkl…
Enter “vibefi” in the gift code section to get 1.5x bonus point on commonsmade
- Click on your profile picture
- Scroll down to gift code
- Enter “vibefi”
- Press enter and wait
Goodluck
Getting into the Top 1,000 for the Commons airdrop will be hard if your Ethos + GitHub base score is low.
So do this:
1. Check your rank here:
commonsmade.com/vouch
2. Note your current base score.
3. Find users with strong base scores.
4. Ask them to vouch for you.
A vouch adds 35% of THEIR base score to yours.
Example:
2,000 base score = +700 points
5. Don’t waste time chasing random vouches.
You only g…
Turns out I might actually be getting an airdrop for sending some USDC to DeFi United during the Aave rescue.
Just pre-claimed some $QUANT. No wallet connect needed either.
If you donated back then, check your wallet here:
- Go to: https://www.quanttoken.org?ref=bc63a7352233eeb3
- Just paste the wallet you used and pre-claim if you're eligible.
No idea what $QUANT will eventually be worth, but if you already qu…
Been a while since we’ve seen an alpha with a decent airdrop actually in sight.
This might be one.
@flop_labs, led by @CryptoHayes, is planning an airdrop for Q4 2026.
And positioning for now is pretty simple:
- Apply to become a KOL/Creator:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScojhvs-LFgRjOclL-FVn_GdiIb5qNcoCE-1Fs8lfntMtvdVQ/viewform
- Apply to become a Validator or GPU Provider:
flop.finance
That’s …
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @teddyalphas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Develocity Official Channel @DevelocityToken · 57,846 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wyck of Web3 Alpha” (@teddyalphas), 76,569 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teddyalphas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.