Enter “vibefi” in the gift code section to get 1.5x bonus point on commonsmade - Click on your profile picture - Scroll down to gift code - Enter “vibefi” - Press enter and wait Goodluck
❤4👍4

Channel
@teddyalphas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
80,474subscribers
-1,276 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001966481807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teddyalphas |
| Description | Undiluted Web3 Alphas |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teddyalphas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 80,474 | -117 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 80,591 | -79 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 80,670 | -84 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 80,754 | -92 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 80,846 | -90 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 80,936 | -122 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 81,058 | -155 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 81,213 | -66 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 81,279 | -93 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 81,372 | -108 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 81,480 | -66 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 81,546 | -103 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 81,649 | -91 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 81,740 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 81,750 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 81,750 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (3 February 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,651 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
359 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 189 | 52.6% | |
| ❤ | 148 | 41.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 2.51% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 1.67% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.11% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.557% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Enter “vibefi” in the gift code section to get 1.5x bonus point on commonsmade - Click on your profile picture - Scroll down to gift code - Enter “vibefi” - Press enter and wait Goodluck
❤4👍4
Who is vouching for me? Will be dropping my vouch randomly to 5 people
🤗6❤3
Getting into the Top 1,000 for the Commons airdrop will be hard if your Ethos + GitHub base score is low. So do this: 1. Check your rank here: commonsmade.com/vouch 2. Note your current base score. 3. Find users with strong base scores. 4. Ask them to vouch for you. A vouch adds 35% of THEIR base score to yours. Example: 2,000 base score = +700 points 5. Don’t waste time chasing random vouches. You only g…
❤7
Turns out I might actually be getting an airdrop for sending some USDC to DeFi United during the Aave rescue. Just pre-claimed some $QUANT. No wallet connect needed either. If you donated back then, check your wallet here: - Go to: https://www.quanttoken.org?ref=bc63a7352233eeb3 - Just paste the wallet you used and pre-claim if you're eligible. No idea what $QUANT will eventually be worth, but if you already qu…
👍6
Been a while since we’ve seen an alpha with a decent airdrop actually in sight. This might be one. @flop_labs, led by @CryptoHayes, is planning an airdrop for Q4 2026. And positioning for now is pretty simple: - Apply to become a KOL/Creator: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScojhvs-LFgRjOclL-FVn_GdiIb5qNcoCE-1Fs8lfntMtvdVQ/viewform - Apply to become a Validator or GPU Provider: flop.finance That’s …
❤12
If you did at least one transaction on Robinhood Chain Testnet when I dropped it, you can check this out. You can claim upto 5500 QUANT 👉 Go to: https://www.quanttoken.org/?ref=4E52BA53 👉 Paste your wallet (you don't need to connect wallet) 👉 You'd see the amount you're eligible to claim 👉 Claim and refer others You can also claim some QUANT even if you don't have any txns. Ends in less than 72 hours.
👍8❤2
In the mood of $OPG airdrop coming through for users yesterday Here's another airdrop you can claim for FREE on Farcaster Go to: https://farcaster.xyz/miniapps/EIuYyqK95Lrc/hypercat?ref=326546 Just complete social task and claim. No need opening any box. Goodluck
👍20❤3
dac_chain testnet is live I almost skipped this, then I realized people who skip start from zero The QE you earn on testnet is the token you get on mainnet you've got only about 1 month to stack it just claimed my badge + bonus get started here: inception.dachain.io/?ref=DAC754943
👍13❤2
I just claimed my tether username for FREE in 10 seconds. Here's how to claim yours: - go to: wallet.tether.io - download wallet app - enter username - claim for free that's all
👍19❤1
I built an AI agent marketplace on GenLayer testnet. It works like this: > you post a task > AI agents execute it > results go through AI consensus before approval You can try it out here: dispatch-steel.vercel.app Under the hood, it uses: - Intelligent Contracts for task execution and validation - Optimistic Democracy for consensus across multiple validators - Equivalence Principle so results are judged by me…
👍15❤2
Just like Fiverr, your AI agents can now work as freelancers to execute tasks and earn. I just launched Dispatch, an AI-powered marketplace where: - users post tasks - AI agents execute them - results are reviewed before approval Live on @arc testnet: dispatch-arc.vercel.app Try it out and give feedback (use burner wallet)
👍14❤4
I just deployed my first dApp on @arc testnet. Been exploring something simple. Onchain payments still feel harder than they should. So I built Veero. 👉 veero.vercel.app A compact payment surface for moving stablecoins fast, without cluttered dashboards or confusing flows. The experience is straightforward: • see your balance instantly • pick a contact • enter amount • send Still early. I’ll keep experimenting …
👍14❤12❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @teddyalphas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wyck of Web3 Alpha” (@teddyalphas), 80,474 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teddyalphas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.