Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -49,448. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 698,063–762,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 09:25
705,480
-552
5 Nov 2026, 10:28
706,032
-457
4 Nov 2026, 11:36
706,489
-501
3 Nov 2026, 08:44
706,990
-444
2 Nov 2026, 11:18
707,434
-468
1 Nov 2026, 09:45
707,902
-422
31 Oct 2026, 11:07
708,324
-499
30 Oct 2026, 09:01
708,823
-499
29 Oct 2026, 12:36
709,322
-412
28 Oct 2026, 14:46
709,734
-459
27 Oct 2026, 18:07
710,193
-440
26 Oct 2026, 19:31
710,633
-480
25 Oct 2026, 17:59
711,113
-458
24 Oct 2026, 18:07
711,571
-341
23 Oct 2026, 15:08
711,912
-565
22 Oct 2026, 16:56
712,477
-581
21 Oct 2026, 14:40
713,058
-712
20 Oct 2026, 07:50
713,770
-504
19 Oct 2026, 10:44
714,274
-606
18 Oct 2026, 07:46
714,880
first reading
Engagement
293 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.116%
avg views ÷ 705,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
821
88 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.429%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
88
of 293 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 74 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
293 (14 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
72,253
Reactions total
267
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,520
Videos
≈22
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,276 reactions across 278 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
483
37.9%
👍
357
28.0%
🔥
117
9.17%
😱
103
8.07%
👏
78
6.11%
👎
39
3.06%
🤯
21
1.65%
👀
14
1.10%
🥰
14
1.10%
😎
8
0.627%
😢
8
0.627%
🐳
4
0.313%
😁
4
0.313%
👾
3
0.235%
🤡
3
0.235%
🍌
2
0.157%
👻
2
0.157%
🤗
2
0.157%
🤝
2
0.157%
🤩
2
0.157%
9 further kinds
10
0.784%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 279 of the 293 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 293 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 293 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @airdrop_oracle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 293 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 88 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨 Ex-FBI Agent Pleads Guilty to Stealing $2.47M in Crypto
Former FBI agent Patrick Steven Yaroch pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering after stealing approximately $2.47 million in cryptocurrency from wallets tied to 35 federal investigations. He used wallet credentials collected during those investigations to execute roughly 100 fraudulent transfers.
The Justice Department said the theft compromised in…
⚖️ ECB targets 2029 digital euro launch with 2027 pilot
ECB Executive Board member Piero Cipollone confirmed the bank is targeting 2029 for the issuance of a digital euro. A pilot phase is set to begin in the second half of 2027 and run for 12 months before any launch decision.
Trade on Binance
🏦 Keel Infrastructure Sells Entire Bitcoin Treasury for $192M
Keel Infrastructure (formerly Bitfarms) liquidated its entire Bitcoin treasury in Q3, selling 2,520 BTC for $192 million in proceeds. The company's treasury is now near zero.
Going forward, Keel says it will sell Bitcoin mined at its Quebec operations on a daily basis as it pivots away from mining toward artificial intelligence data center infrastructure…
₿ American Bitcoin Posts $126M Q3 Profit on BTC Treasury Gains
Eric Trump-backed American Bitcoin reported $126 million in Q3 net income, swinging from a $57.2 million loss the prior quarter. The turnaround was driven almost entirely by a $197.3 million accounting gain on its Bitcoin holdings — without it, the miner would have posted roughly $70 million in pre-tax losses.
Operational results weakened: revenue fell …
⚖️ Pro-Crypto Candidates Win 241 Congressional Seats
Pro-crypto candidates have swept 241 seats in Congress, according to an unofficial tally, marking a significant shift in legislative composition. The count identifies backers of the CLARITY Act among the winners, though the ratings do not confirm enough votes to guarantee the bill's passage.
Trade on Binance
💵 Stripe Launches Stablecoin Payouts Across 160+ Markets
Stripe has launched Global Payouts, a new feature allowing US businesses to send payments directly to crypto wallets in over 160 markets using stablecoins.
Trade on Binance
🏦 Morgan Stanley Tokenizes US Stocks and Treasuries via DTCC
Morgan Stanley has become one of the first banks to tokenize real-world assets, converting US equities and Treasuries through the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation's new Tokenization Service (DTS), launched October 28.
The bank is among 20 institutions signed up at launch. DTS enables 24/7 token transfers between registered wallets on the same block…
🏦 Block Reaches $764M DOJ Settlement Over AML Lapses
Jack Dorsey's Block has agreed in principle to a $964 million DOJ settlement over anti-money-laundering violations, with credits from prior regulatory resolutions reducing the net payment to approximately $764 million. The deal resolves a federal AML investigation into the company.
Separately, Block's bitcoin ecosystem gross profit fell 50% quarter-over-quarter, …
🚨 Binance Reveals $6.34B Hack Was Months-Long Campaign
Binance has published a report detailing a months-long attack that resulted in a $6.34 billion hack. The exchange states that 98% of impacted tokens have since been replenished, and the report addresses why pausing withdrawals failed to prevent every outflow during the incident.
Trade on Binance
🚨 Mercado Bitcoin Hacked, $11M Blocked, Services Suspended
Brazilian crypto exchange Mercado Bitcoin has suspended customer access to its platform following a hack on November 2, 2026. The exchange has promised no customer asset losses, but has not identified a reimbursement funding source or provided a deadline. $11 million in assets has been blocked as a result of the incident.
Trade on Binance
🚨 Binance Hack Funds Spread Across 12,000 Wallets in 4 Days
Funds stolen from Binance passed through approximately 12,000 wallets in under four days, according to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. The laundering operation spanned 11 blockchains. Elliptic assessed that only a negligible amount of the stolen assets had likely been cashed out so far.
Trade on Binance
🚨 $106M Suspected Stolen From EU Entity, ZachXBT Reports
On-chain investigator ZachXBT flagged a suspected theft of over $106 million from an unidentified EU-based entity, with funds drained from multiple centralized exchange accounts. The incident reportedly occurred on November 1, 2026.
The attacker swapped stolen funds into ETH, then routed them through instant exchanges, Monero, and cross-chain bridges includin…
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 293 posts we hold for @airdrop_oracle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @airdrop_oracle as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
42 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrops Alert Pro @AirdropsAlertPro · 40,202 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
PAXGold Channel @PAXGold_Channel · 51,661 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Digital Zombies @digital_zombies · 306,110 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 255,087 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
$BEER 2.0 @beercoinchannel · 687,671 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Drop Club @drop_cryptogo · 1,337,202 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
GM Crypto @gm_cryp · 32,766 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,085,929 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Codyfight Announcements @codyfightnews · 46,934 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 276,433 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Forward Protocol @ForwardProtocol · 43,953 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten @INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,057,876 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Tomo Cat Community @tomo_cat · 1,990,018 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 500,509 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
Panther Airdrops @PantherAirdropsz · 58,811 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
WUFFI Announcements @wuffi_announcements · 1,083,641 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
CryptoProIncome @Cryptoproincome · 33,641 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 57,767 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Memecoin daily @memecoin_daily · 786,362 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
$STYLE Official @styletoken · 44,920 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Cryptopolitan @CryptopolitanOfficial · 24,069 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,658,948 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
AirdropAlert-com | Crypto Airdrops for Everyone @airdrop_alert_dot_com · 194,952 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
HOT Airdrops 🔥 GlimNetwork! @GlimNetwork · 19,897 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 93 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
21 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Oracle” (@airdrop_oracle), 705,480 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_oracle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.