$RED #Red is making Bullish Falling Wedge, breakout has already done in 1D time frame. Expecting an energetic move. In this move we can see price around 0.1800$

Channel
GM Crypto
@gm_cryp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,755subscribers
-821 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002119727721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gm_cryp |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gm_cryp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 34,755 | -55 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:06 | 34,810 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 34,829 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 34,871 | -47 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 34,918 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 34,954 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 34,994 | -23 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 35,017 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 35,046 | -26 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 35,072 | -47 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 35,119 | -65 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 35,184 | -27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 35,211 | -29 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 35,240 | -36 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 35,276 | -32 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 35,308 | -23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 35,331 | -39 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 35,370 | -30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 35,400 | -24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 35,424 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.221%
- avg views ÷ 34,755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 76.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (5 May 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 307 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$THETA #Theta is getting a good volume here. Breakout has already done. Expecting 1000%+ gain here after successful retest.
$TREE #Tree is making Bullish falling wedge. Here it has maximum Chance we can see a good Bullish wave. Looking for a good volume here. We can see price around 0.0700$ soon. That is around 80%+ gain.
$HYPER Breakout of the Bullish Falling Wedge has already done & Now Retesting in Process Successful Retest Can Lead Massive Bullish Rally Towards 0.1200
$ONDO ONDO formed a bullish falling wedge, and the breakout has already occurred on the 1D timeframe. An energetic move is expected, with the price potentially reaching around $0.5500.
🔥1
$TLM The bullish falling wedge breakout has already occurred with a very strong candle on the 1D timeframe. It now appears ready for a strong bullish wave, with the potential to gain more than 100% in the coming days.
🔥1
$GMX GMX formed a bullish falling wedge, and the breakout has already occurred on the 1D timeframe. An energetic move is expected, with the price potentially reaching around $9.50.
$PHA The bullish falling wedge breakout has already occurred, and the price is now in the retesting phase. A successful retest could lead to a massive bullish rally toward $0.0400.
$AAVE AAVE is forming a bullish falling wedge, and the breakout has already happened on the 1D time frame. Expecting an energetic move. In this move, we may see the price around 140.00.
$JUV JUV is still consolidating in a bullish falling wedge. The stronger it gets, the higher it may go. Expecting 70%+ profit after breakout.
$PORTAL Portal is forming a bullish falling wedge, and the breakout has already happened on the 1D time frame. Expecting an energetic move. In this move, we may see the price around 0.03000.
$CFG The falling wedge pattern has formed and is now ready for a breakout on the 1D time frame. A successful breakout may lead to a 55–60% increase in price.
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @gm_cryp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hotonnear · 4,788,115#1
@theyescoin · 5,931,267#2
@seedupdates · 8,486,649#3
@dotcoincommunity · 4,088,515#4
@catapult_extreme · 8,801,038#5
@pocketfi · 1,844,625#6
@gameechannel · 1,944,046#7
@therealyescoin · 2,139,710#8
@trendingapps · 3,896,289#9
@cultofnot · 1,043,864#10
@WagmiHub_News · 1,103,908#11
@smpl_app · 1,663,314#12
@airdrop_oracle · 738,937#13
@hexnio · 2,047,808#14
@wuffi_announcements · 1,141,551#15
@cryptosayer · 787,323#16
@watbird · 1,512,780#17
@memecoin_daily · 822,360#18
@tea_solmeme · 1,202,348#19
@gemswall · 1,440,651#20
@VenomFoundationOfficial · 897,275#21
@dailyscan_en · 1,019,185#22
@clear_feed_media · 520,667#23
@metazoneofficial · 576,407#24
@OGC_Announcements_Hub · 472,464#25
@cryptotradingsignaldaily · 112,094#26
@BBQCoinTeam · 989,296#27
@onchainchain · 768,631#28
@drops_on_hot · 886,980#29
@xyzbookxyz · 157,046#30
@pocket_rocket_game · 704,288#31
@watersolmeme · 1,159,593#32
@Cryptoproincome · 35,679#33
@versiamusic · 21,623#34
@cryp_pando · 47,963#35
@the_vertus · 2,196,125#36
@catizenann · 3,675,259#37
@fx_holding_community · 6,278,172#38
@myflem · 49,777#39
@TheCryptoBoar · 134,074#40
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,257,152#41
@pictographs_official · 87,617#42
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,569,209#43
@kotdelovod · 11,235#44
@cryptomedwed · 146,292#45
@cryptoconsultantonline · 94,979#46
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,174,296#47
@VdovichevCrypto_WEB3 · 165,217#48
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 784,397#49
@mem_notcoin · 84,215#50
@cashcryp · 112,526#51
@icryptobar · 86,099#52
@avagoldcoin · 1,802,811#53
@hamsterupdate · 548,146#54
@birdton · 831,268#55
@storm_trade_news · 934,789#56
@wave_announcements · 756,672#57
@vodkatokensol · 266,368#58
@sergeisergienkoen · 3,190,040#59
@hellopixelapp · 262,467#60
@cosmobear_io · 775,911#61
@dragonz_land_announcement · 711,547#62
@Coin_Strategist · 1,069,290#63
@bunnyapp · 633,181#64
@rr1234685 · 233,495#65
@OfficialEveDex · 433,533#66
@habitnetwork · 239,678#67
@investkingyru · 1,783,816#68
@BOMT_Official · 578,088#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pictographs_official · 87,617
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
@asacoine · 118,678
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
@myflem · 49,777
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GM Crypto” (@gm_cryp), 34,755 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gm_cryp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.