Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
456 average views per post against 795,952 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.057%. Across the 1,192 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,288–998,609 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 11.7%, with a median of 4.36%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Posts measured
66 of 66 published in the window (66 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
30,110
Mature posts only
0.059% over 62 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -8,764. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 793,027–804,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:08
794,342
-1,120
21 Aug 2026, 04:14
795,462
-490
20 Aug 2026, 04:15
795,952
-453
19 Aug 2026, 06:26
796,405
-542
18 Aug 2026, 09:03
796,947
-461
17 Aug 2026, 12:34
797,408
-841
16 Aug 2026, 02:05
798,249
-854
14 Aug 2026, 12:27
799,103
-853
13 Aug 2026, 04:55
799,956
-575
12 Aug 2026, 03:42
800,531
-496
11 Aug 2026, 04:12
801,027
-648
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
801,675
-577
9 Aug 2026, 00:52
802,252
-586
7 Aug 2026, 21:51
802,838
-268
7 Aug 2026, 12:30
803,106
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.058%
avg views ÷ 794,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
458
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.929%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 76 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
77 (4 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
35,281
Reactions total
323
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
323 reactions across 75 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
157
48.6%
❤
75
23.2%
🔥
36
11.1%
👏
27
8.36%
😱
9
2.79%
🤯
6
1.86%
🥰
5
1.55%
💔
4
1.24%
🐳
1
0.31%
👎
1
0.31%
😎
1
0.31%
🤔
1
0.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏦 Druckenmiller puts $88M into crypto-adjacent plays
Stanley Druckenmiller's Duquesne Family Office has disclosed positions in Bitdeer, a publicly traded Bitcoin mining and data center operator, and Hyperliquid, a decentralized trading platform — totalling roughly $88 million in digital asset exposure.
When a macro legend of Druckenmiller's calibre starts allocating eight figures to crypto infrastructure, it's wort…
₿ Bitcoin Blows Past $79K on Regulation and Buyback News
Bitcoin surged through $79,000 on Friday, fueled by a combination of positive regulatory developments and a US government buyback pledge. The move marks a sharp continuation of the recent rally as sentiment shifts noticeably in the bulls' favor.
Details on the specific regulatory news and buyback terms are thin in this report, but the market clearly liked wha…
Didn't have time to catch up this week? Here's everything that matters in 2 minutes.
🚀 Bitcoin explodes past $79K, up 10% in 24 hours
XRP led altcoins with +18.8% as short liquidations, ETF demand and regulatory optimism fueled the rally.
👉 Read more
📊 $3.8B in shorts wiped out over two days
Thursday's single-day liquidation figure set a record going back to 2021.
👉 Read more
🚨 Bybit blocked $700M in threats af…
₿ Bitcoin Rips 6.2% to $79K, Shorts Caught Offside
Bitcoin broke sharply out of its multi-week $65K–$68K consolidation range, surging 6.2% to $77,393 and tagging an intraday high of $79,461. Bearish leverage was caught badly positioned as volatility expanded after weeks of compressed price action — a classic short squeeze setup.
Whether this is the start of something bigger or just a violent flush of overcrowded sh…
🏦 Bitcoin Miners Spent $5.1B on AI, Earned $341M Back
Nine publicly-listed Bitcoin mining companies poured $5.11 billion into capital infrastructure in H1 2026, chasing AI and high-performance computing revenue — but pulled in just $341.2 million from those segments over the same period, a roughly 15-to-1 spend-to-earn ratio, per BlocksBridge Consulting data.
The miners are clearly betting this gap closes fast. Whe…
🚀 CRYPTOMARKET EXPLODES
Bitcoin is back above $79,000, up more than 10% in 24 hours as a massive cryptocurrency rally gathers momentum.
But BTC isn’t moving alone:
🟠 BTC +10.8%
🔵 ETH +8.4%
🟣 SOL +8.1%
⚡️ XRP +18.8%
📈 DOT +9.7%
The rally is fueled by short liquidations, renewed demand for ETFs, improved liquidity, and growing optimism about U.S. cryptocurrency regulation.
🔥 Bitcoin is on fire — and altcoins are f…
📊 $3.8B in shorts wiped out over two days
Bitcoin, Ether, and Solana are climbing as the short-squeeze pain continues — another $1 billion in short positions liquidated, bringing the two-day total to roughly $3.8 billion. Thursday's single-day figure alone set a record going back to 2021.
Betting against this market has been an expensive hobby lately.
Source
Trade on Binance
₿ Bitcoin Clears $72K — But Can It Hold the Line?
Bitcoin has pushed past $72,000, and analysts aren't writing it off as a short squeeze story alone. Spot buying and ETF demand are cited as the structural forces behind the move — which matters, because short squeezes are loud but brief.
The key test: $70,000. Analysts say BTC needs to stay above that level to confirm the rally has legs beyond forced liquidations. M…
₿ Bitcoin Tops $72K as Trump Pushes Clarity Act
Bitcoin surged past $72,000 Thursday — its highest level since early June — after President Trump met with crypto executives and publicly urged lawmakers to pass the long-awaited Clarity Act. The leading cryptocurrency was trading at $71,758 at 8am New York time, up nearly 12% in 24 hours.
The Clarity Act, designed to establish a regulatory framework for digital asset…
₿ Trump Eyes Bitcoin Whale Status — Congress Holds the Keys
Trump said on Aug. 20 the US is considering accumulating "sizable amounts" of Bitcoin and other crypto. His 2025 executive order already directs Treasury toward BTC, and existing law offers a few paths to grow federal holdings — but no current authority funds multibillion-dollar open-market purchases. For that kind of firepower, Congress writes the check. T…
🪂 Yakkamon — Free NFT Airdrop on Ronin
🎁 Yakkamon is a new creature-collector and idle farming game from Thought Farm, the team behind Sunflower Land. The game is launching on Ronin and uses the existing $FLOWER token.
🔹 How to participate:
Pre-register for free with just an email
Get a Monster Egg when you sign up
Earn Season 0 points through daily activity and social tasks
Climb the leaderboard for a chance to rec…
₿ Bitcoin ETFs Pull $517M in a Day — Best in 3.5 Months
Spot Bitcoin ETFs just recorded their largest single-day net inflows in three and a half months, hauling in $517 million. Analysts point to the catalyst: a surprise US Treasury Department buyback expansion announcement that sparked a broader crypto market rally.
When the macro stars align, institutional money doesn't hesitate. Whether the rally has legs is ano…
👍3🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @cryptosayer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 427,602 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Unicorn Crypto Academy @unicorn_crypt · 518,337 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
Bogdan & Xena RU @Bogdan_and_Xena_ru · 140,527 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER | Deutscher @CRYPTO_insider_deutscher · 1,181,442 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO INSIDER @CRYPTO_insidderr · 1,598,405 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER Deutscher | Nachrichten @INSIDER_Nachrichten · 1,152,761 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
CRYPTO JOKER @CRYPTO_jokker · 2,111,570 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 August 2026
INSIDER UK | News @INSIDER_UK_NEWS · 1,226,895 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER | News | Politics | USA @INSIDERR_POLITIC · 1,848,614 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Hedgehog in the fog @hedgehoginthefogen · 267,972 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
$BEER 2.0 @beercoinchannel · 718,464 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER USA | News @INSIDER_USA_NEWS · 1,426,830 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Era | Trading, News, Airdrops @CryptoEraEng · 175,278 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Airdrop Oracle @airdrop_oracle · 746,682 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Crypto Hunters | Announcements @cryptohunters_announcements · 73,241 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Insider | CRYPTOINS @cryptoins · 133,277 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
GameGPT | Announcements @gamegptANN · 123,676 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Tomo Cat Community @tomo_cat · 2,247,784 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
GT Protocol Announcements Channel @GTProtocolNews · 254,661 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Web3Key @Web3key_eng · 469,908 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
WUFFI Announcements @wuffi_announcements · 1,152,251 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Panther Airdrops @PantherAirdropsz · 67,894 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
Not a trader ENG @NotatraderENG · 513,299 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 694,810 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Memecoin daily @memecoin_daily · 829,528 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Soothsayer” (@cryptosayer), 794,342 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosayer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.