🏆🪙 Sports × crypto digest 1. Morning Minute: BlackRock Leans Deeper Into Tokenization with Ondo — Decrypt where do you stand? tag someone who needs this 👇 News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
👀1

Channel
@sportscryptoinsider
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
826,931subscribers
-68,884 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002205475190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sportscryptoinsider |
| Description | A channel for sports enthusiasts, global tournaments, and fierce competitions! Advertisement: @xiller |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sportscryptoinsider |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
258 average views per post against 826,931 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.031%. Across the 1,197 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,564–998,717 subscribers — the middle half sit between 1.48% and 10.9%, with a median of 3.86%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 281 of 281 published in the window (281 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 72,455 |
| Mature posts only | 0.032% over 265 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 826,931 measured 25 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b316228 · 1,197 channels · p10 0.458% · p25 1.48% · p50 3.86% · p75 10.9% · p90 23.2% |
| Position in cohort | 0.502th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 826,931 | -8,096 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 835,027 | -2,470 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 837,497 | -2,744 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 840,241 | -2,206 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 842,447 | -3,120 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 845,567 | -3,664 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 849,231 | -4,854 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 854,085 | -3,088 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 857,173 | -1,834 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 859,007 | -1,434 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:52 | 860,441 | -1,558 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 861,999 | -1,126 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 863,125 | -1,711 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 864,836 | -1,480 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 866,316 | -1,963 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 868,279 | -377 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 868,656 | -1,583 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 870,239 | -1,190 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 871,429 | -2,883 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 874,312 | first reading |
489 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 239 of 281 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 489 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 72,925 |
| Reactions total | 286 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
501 reactions across 420 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 95 | 19.0% | |
| 🤯 | 90 | 18.0% | |
| ⚡ | 87 | 17.4% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 16.8% | |
| 👀 | 77 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 12.0% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.2% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 420 of the 489 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 501 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 489 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆🪙 Sports × crypto digest 1. Morning Minute: BlackRock Leans Deeper Into Tokenization with Ondo — Decrypt where do you stand? tag someone who needs this 👇 News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
👀1
🤯 Did you know? The Ballon d'Or has been awarded since 1956. right? #sports #crypto #fantoken #nba #football #ufc News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
👍1
🥇 Today's sports highlights 1. Man City and the 115 charges - key questions answered — BBC Sport 2. What could the potential sanctions for Man City be? — BBC Sport 3. Who is hacker whose revelations led to Man City charges? — BBC Sport 4. EFL latest: Edwards would be prepared to take charge at Saints — Sky Sports 5. Fury: AJ is 'stepping stone' to Usyk trilogy — Sky Sports just me? News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👀1
🚨 FAN TOKEN ALERT ⚽🪙 Napoli Fan Token (NAP) 📉 dropped 10.5% today! Current price: $0.2102 Is your team's token moving? 👇 #breaking #sports #crypto #fantoken 📡 @sportscryptoinsider News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
🔥2
🚨 BREAKING SPORTS NEWS Fisher outweighs rival as Pirotton issues knockout threat 🔗 Read more — Sky Sports React with 🔥 if you saw this coming! #breaking #sports #crypto #fantoken 📡 @sportscryptoinsider News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
👍1
🥇 Today's sports highlights 1. Our son's death could have been prevented by FA - Billy Vigar's parents — BBC Sport 2. Bellamy wants more from Wales after loss to Portugal — BBC Sport 3. Zidane waited for France - now can he harness their star power? — BBC Sport 4. Azerbaijan GP: Russell still ahead in final practice before Qualifying LIVE! — Sky Sports 5. Chelsea in landmark fertility policy: 'Being a player and…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
🏟️ Premier League Scores 🏟️ LIV 1 - 0 BOU (FT) 🏟️ CRY 0 - 0 LEE (FT) 🏟️ SUN 3 - 5 MNC (FT) 🏟️ MAN 1 - 1 FUL (FT) #sports #crypto #fantoken #nba #football #ufc News | Memes | 𝕏 takes
👀1
Athletes in crypto — smart move? 🏅🪙
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
⚽ Cristiano Ronaldo The GOAT of football has dominated the pitch for two decades—5 Ballon d'Ors, 890+ career goals, and a legacy that transcends sport. 🏆 Whether at Manchester United, Real Madrid, or Juventus, CR7's competitive fire never dimmed. But here's where it gets spicy: 🔥 Ronaldo jumped into crypto with both feet! He partnered with Binance in 2023, becoming a global ambassador for the world's largest crypto…
🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 489 posts we hold for @sportscryptoinsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 53 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Athletes in crypto — smart move? 🏅🪙
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Best sports documentary ever? 🎬🍿
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Your sports watching habit?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Athletes in crypto — smart move? 🏅🪙
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which sport needs MORE crypto?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Athletes in crypto — smart move? 🏅🪙
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 489 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 52 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sports Insider” (@sportscryptoinsider), 826,931 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sportscryptoinsider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.