Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -10,387. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 468,350–481,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 12:32
469,908
-1,237
20 Aug 2026, 23:48
471,145
-429
20 Aug 2026, 00:04
471,574
-1,071
18 Aug 2026, 21:24
472,645
-441
17 Aug 2026, 20:13
473,086
-989
16 Aug 2026, 20:28
474,075
-1,008
15 Aug 2026, 07:33
475,083
-729
14 Aug 2026, 00:55
475,812
-628
12 Aug 2026, 21:54
476,440
-751
11 Aug 2026, 22:13
477,191
-794
10 Aug 2026, 19:12
477,985
-772
9 Aug 2026, 15:15
478,757
-758
8 Aug 2026, 12:31
479,515
-780
7 Aug 2026, 12:30
480,295
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:22
480,295
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.105%
avg views ÷ 469,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
493
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.474%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
20 (25 March 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
1,478
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
56
32.0%
❤
51
29.1%
⚡
19
10.9%
👏
14
8.00%
👍
13
7.43%
😁
13
7.43%
🆒
3
1.71%
👌
2
1.14%
💯
2
1.14%
😭
1
0.571%
🥰
1
0.571%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Web3key_eng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸 IS THE U.S. PREPARING TO BUY MORE CRYPTO?
Donald Trump’s latest remarks at the White House Crypto Summit have put a major question back in front of the market:
What cryptocurrencies could the U.S. potentially add to its reserves? 👀
Trump said the U.S. is considering purchasing a “substantial amount” of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, while the final decision would be handled by his economic team and relevant …
📊 ETH/BTC UPDATE | The Move Has Started
🚨 The scenario we highlighted a few days ago is now playing out.
ETH/BTC has started a sharp upside move on the 4H timeframe, breaking away from the previous consolidation zone and currently trading around 0.03055.
More importantly, the move has been accompanied by a significant increase in volume, suggesting that this is more than just a low-volume bounce.
🔹 In our previous …
🟣 ETH/BTC — One of the Most Important Signals for the Altcoin Market
The ETH/BTC pair is one of the key charts to watch when analyzing the potential rotation of capital toward altcoins.
On the weekly timeframe, ETH/BTC is currently trading around 0.03 BTC, with a major support zone around:
🟢 0.023 BTC
The key resistance level is currently around:
🔴 0.05 BTC
A confirmed breakout above 0.05 could signal a major shift …
🚀 Capital Floods Into Crypto Exchanges
As Bitcoin rallied toward $80K, BTC perpetual futures open interest recorded its fastest growth of 2026.
According to CryptoQuant:
Binance captured most of the new derivatives capital.
Exchange stablecoin reserves surged.
Altcoin deposits increased significantly.
📈 This suggests strong liquidity inflows and growing market participation.
⚠️ While bullish overall, rising leverage…
👛 Tonkeeper Update: Trade tab
All tokens are now in one place!
Track the market and trade in Tonkeeper — everything’s organized so you can navigate the market faster.
👑 Most traded — tokens with the highest trading volume, everything that is currently in the spotlight.
💎 Real world assets — tokenized stocks and ETFs by xStocks, as well as Tether Gold (digital gold).
💎 Core tokens — key market tokens: TON and oth…
💰 Stablecoin Allocation Among Binance Users Hits 28%
According to data from Binance, only 4% of users in 2020 held more than half of their portfolio in stablecoins. Today, that figure has climbed to 28%.
📊 That means 1 in 4 Binance users now keeps at least 50% of their portfolio in stablecoins.
🔍 What Does This Mean?
Investors are becoming more cautious.
Many are waiting for better market opportunities.
A large amoun…
🔥 BULLISH: Altcoin Momentum Is Building
According to CryptoQuant, the 30-day average trading volume of altcoins has moved above its yearly baseline.
📈 This typically suggests:
Fresh liquidity is entering the altcoin market.
Trader interest in altcoins is increasing.
The probability of an Altseason is rising.
📊 Analysis: When trading volume remains above the annual average, it often signals stronger momentum and grow…
👑MAKE 💎TON GREAT AGAIN:
⚡️ Fees in TON have dropped 6× — to nearly zero.
Next step — Telegram replaces the TON Foundation as the driving force behind TON and becomes its largest validator.
⚙️ The focus shifts to tech superiority.
🧩 New ton.org, new dev tools, new performance upgrades.
🧭 Timeline — 2-3 weeks.
🪙 This is step 3 of 7 to Make TON Great Again.
A Key to Web3 🔑
📢 🇺🇸 Crypto News | Market Structure Bill Update
Senator Cynthia Lummis says the CLARITY Act will be marked up in May, aiming to push it toward final approval 🚀
💡 What’s the goal?
🔹 Clear classification:
Securities → SEC
Commodities → CFTC
👉 Ending regulatory uncertainty in crypto
⚙️ Key points:
• SEC vs CFTC jurisdiction split
• Clear rules for exchanges & projects
• Stablecoin framework (still debated)
• Some protec…
❤4👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Web3key_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 778,172 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 694,810 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Not a trader ENG @NotatraderENG · 513,299 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
<\> Sharding, TON's, two Jetons </>. @ton2keng · 627,091 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 532,999 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
the noton @thenoton · 758,255 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
TonDreamer Eng @TonDreamerEng · 780,038 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
TON POINTER ENG @TONPOINTEReng · 567,026 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Wyck of Web3 Alpha @teddyalphas · 80,474 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
CryptoTheDoggy | Blockchain News, Insights & Learning @cryptothedoggy · 147,480 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 61,190 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Hunters | Announcements @cryptohunters_announcements · 73,241 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Soothsayer @cryptosayer · 794,342 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 127,779 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Gem Hunters @gemhunt · 132,385 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
GameGPT | Announcements @gamegptANN · 123,676 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
GT Protocol Announcements Channel @GTProtocolNews · 254,661 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 400,452 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
daGama @da_ga_ma · 73,527 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Evan Luthra Alpha @EvanLuthraVIP · 307,684 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Panther Airdrops @PantherAirdropsz · 67,894 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
HASBILAND @hasbiland · 62,741 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
TON Покер Новости @tonpokerroomnews · 202,297 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Binaca @CryptoBinaca · 158,465 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 305,557 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web3Key” (@Web3key_eng), 469,908 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3key_eng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.