Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -66,632. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 725,165–811,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:19
735,160
-3,500
15 Sept 2026, 18:56
738,660
-1,903
14 Sept 2026, 01:21
740,563
-3,560
12 Sept 2026, 05:36
744,123
-3,820
9 Sept 2026, 23:41
747,943
-5,046
6 Sept 2026, 18:59
752,989
-4,669
4 Sept 2026, 05:16
757,658
-2,848
2 Sept 2026, 17:48
760,506
-2,118
1 Sept 2026, 19:23
762,624
-2,300
31 Aug 2026, 18:55
764,924
-1,462
30 Aug 2026, 19:36
766,386
-2,234
29 Aug 2026, 20:05
768,620
-1,931
28 Aug 2026, 19:12
770,551
-1,404
27 Aug 2026, 22:45
771,955
-898
26 Aug 2026, 21:14
772,853
-1,317
25 Aug 2026, 21:38
774,170
-1,444
24 Aug 2026, 20:25
775,614
-2,343
23 Aug 2026, 07:05
777,957
-2,081
21 Aug 2026, 17:49
780,038
-1,548
20 Aug 2026, 14:35
781,586
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.154%
avg views ÷ 735,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
26 (7 May 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
1,130
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
464 reactions across 26 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
162
34.9%
🔥
139
30.0%
👍
62
13.4%
💯
21
4.53%
❤🔥
19
4.09%
😁
19
4.09%
😇
7
1.51%
🤪
5
1.08%
👌
4
0.862%
😘
4
0.862%
🎃
3
0.647%
⚡
2
0.431%
✍
2
0.431%
🍾
2
0.431%
🐳
2
0.431%
👾
2
0.431%
🗿
2
0.431%
🫡
2
0.431%
🌚
1
0.216%
🍓
1
0.216%
3 further kinds
3
0.647%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 26 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonDreamerEng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 10 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🐹You know, it's always like this for me: you scroll through the latest leaderboard out of habit, nothing catches your eye, and then you stumble upon a wallet that just keeps accelerating. This trader on Polymarket made a profit of +$12k in literally a week.
At first, I just wanted to observe - put in a minimum amount to @polyfox and see how it actually works. But I went through the statistics - win rate, number of t…
Thinking about updating my avatar, I thought for a long time about who to order it from, and then I remembered that I published it very recently)
They say that 50+ designers have already arrived, I'll create a task now, hoping someone will fit the budget)
Who hasn't dropped by yet - welcome
Talents
Genesis nft
Invitation code: BP2VCM6B0Z
🤑Freelance Talents platform on TON - let’s get started!
🙏I mentioned this project earlier. To put it simply, this is a platform where the customer finds a freelancer, and the freelancer finds the customer. Thus, some receive the finished product, while others are rewarded for their work. Naturally, all this revolves on the TON blockchain.
Structure: The customer creates a project and submits a budget to the smart c…
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩You know, it happens to me - you flip through the tape, nothing catches on, and then you come across an update from a team that just doesn’t slow down. My Wallet is just this case.
Just in this release: we added the Robinhood network (yes, now tokenized shares of Apple, Tesla, Nvidia are directly in the wallet), built in Omniston, an aggregator that finds the best exchange rate for all DEX in TON, and brought suppo…
🍿It is always interesting to observe the mood in the industry. When there is a total bearish vibe around, it seems that there will be no more growth.
But if you look at it soberly, can it even happen if the community is mentally at the bottom? Of course it can. Anything is possible in this world. It is during periods like this, when most people bury projects and stop working, that those who persevere come.
Victory …
Come as a boy — leave as a king.
Today is the final push. Whether it will be victorious, the game will decide, but one thing cannot be taken away: without a legend, football will not be the same 🥹
🤩I have a feeling something cool is about to happen with the tone, like it's about to take off. Unfortunately, I have a bit of TA knowledge and haven't really gotten into trading, but my intuition rarely fails me. In any case, DYOR, but it doesn't smell like a dump.)
By the way, it is currently $1.64, and when the market crashed hard in October, even this price per ton was wiped out in less than a week. Every hunter…
🤩Talents is a platform from the very owls that TON conquered
🤷♂️They are planning to launch soon, but they are still collecting a budget. In fact, you become a co-owner and receive a portion of the Talents platform’s commissions for HODL $TNT coins.
🎃Not a financial recommendation, but if you’re interested, you can look
Back in 2016-2017, my acquaintance was trading ETH; at that time, the price was around $15, as I recall, and possibly even lower. He was making good money, you could say, a lot of it, but we learned a huge lesson from this experience:
HOLD > Trade
Not because he was getting wiped out in every bearish phase, not because he was getting too little in the moment, but because he was getting too little over the long term…
🔥10❤8👍7✍2😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @TonDreamerEng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 10 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GRAM Content English @TONContentEnglish · 579,903 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
CashFlow‘s Calls @CashFlowsCalls · 508,677 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
Anatoly Makosov @anatoly_makosov · 42,515 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Ton Post @tonpost · 73,057 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
The Daily TON | News @thedailyton · 256,828 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Tonologia Eng @tonologiaENG · 654,271 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Web3Key @Web3key_eng · 447,387 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
the noton @thenoton · 715,387 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Not a trader ENG @NotatraderENG · 488,356 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 August 2026
Gist Ng - Nigeria News & Gossips @Gist_Ng · 116,411 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 August 2026
TON POINTER ENG @TONPOINTEReng · 539,702 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Trade Notcoin @not_a_trade · 219,050 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
TON Dev News @tondev_news · 41,092 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
$STYLE Official @styletoken · 47,045 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
The Open Network @tonblockchain · 188,122 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
ULTRADE Announcements @ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,473 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
TON Jobs @tonhunt · 65,557 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Reality Metaverse @RealityMeta · 42,097 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Unchained @unchainedweb3 · 44,104 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
TON Status @tonstatus · 158,676 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Orbs Announcements 🌐 @OrbsAnnouncements · 74,637 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 124,846 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 390,659 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
TonNomads @tonnomads · 24,523 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 57 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TonDreamer Eng” (@TonDreamerEng), 735,160 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonDreamerEng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.