Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -4,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71,829–77,281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 10:05
72,458
-43
5 Nov 2026, 12:01
72,501
-49
4 Nov 2026, 11:07
72,550
-34
3 Nov 2026, 13:11
72,584
-96
2 Nov 2026, 11:10
72,680
-25
1 Nov 2026, 10:30
72,705
-54
31 Oct 2026, 08:36
72,759
-49
30 Oct 2026, 05:00
72,808
-53
29 Oct 2026, 06:18
72,861
-40
28 Oct 2026, 07:11
72,901
-40
27 Oct 2026, 06:27
72,941
-39
26 Oct 2026, 02:48
72,980
-27
25 Oct 2026, 02:19
73,007
-39
24 Oct 2026, 02:46
73,046
-34
23 Oct 2026, 00:06
73,080
-48
22 Oct 2026, 01:41
73,128
-58
20 Oct 2026, 21:32
73,186
-47
19 Oct 2026, 19:18
73,233
-44
18 Oct 2026, 20:28
73,277
-36
17 Oct 2026, 20:45
73,313
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.493%
avg views ÷ 72,458 subscribers
Avg views / post
357
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
32 (11 May 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
1,787
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 19:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈452
Videos
≈25
Links
≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
134 reactions across 32 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
36.6%
👍
39
29.1%
🔥
21
15.7%
👏
8
5.97%
💯
2
1.49%
🥰
2
1.49%
✍
1
0.746%
❤🔥
1
0.746%
🎅
1
0.746%
🎉
1
0.746%
👾
1
0.746%
🕊
1
0.746%
😡
1
0.746%
😭
1
0.746%
😱
1
0.746%
😴
1
0.746%
🤗
1
0.746%
🤝
1
0.746%
🥴
1
0.746%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Institutions are coming onchain. Compliance is the hard part.
🤝 Orbs has made a strategic investment in CRYMBO, the infrastructure platform enabling licensed institutions to launch compliant digital asset services.
📖 Read why: https://www.orbs.com/orbs-strategic-investment-crymbo/
📢 OIP-10: Season 1 of Tokenomics, Token Burn
With OIP-9 approved and the Orbs DAO up and running, the DAO now has its first tokenomics proposal.
What OIP-10 proposes:
• A seasonal pool of 507,540,603 ORBS (approximately $3.5M, based on the 30-day TWAP as of November 2) from the Long-Term Reserves Pool
• A smart contract burns part of the pool each week: $67,307.69 divided by the 7-day TWAP of ORBS
• The TWAP used, …
🎙️ Orbs CEO Ran Hammer joined Brave New Coin's Crypto Conversation podcast
Ran covers:
• Why on chain finance is going professional, from small bot teams to institutions
• Perpetual Hub Ultra 2.0 and how it brings deep perps liquidity to any chain
• Orbs as an MCP and agent skill, and how protocols get discovered when AI agents pick the tools
• The OIP-9 DAO vote and Season 1 tokenomics, built on revenue-funded buyb…
Builders supporting builders 🛠
Orbs’ Japanese community teamed up with Superteam Japan and Yuki for a hackathon workshop, helping participants develop ideas and build out their projects
https://x.com/JapanOrbs/status/2108864558538641433/photo/1
That's a wrap on Seoul 🇰🇷
Ran Hammer on the Stable Stage, Onchain Night with Injective, Stable, and Pear Protocol. A VIP dinner with partners and Guardians, and sponsoring Seoul Index
Till next time 🫡
Day one at KBW 🤝
Orbs water bottles around the venue and Ran Hammer on the Stable Stage with his keynote, “DeFi Is Dead, Long Live Onchain Finance.”
Great seeing everyone in Seoul. More to come at tomorrow’s events 🔜
Busy week ahead in Seoul 🇰🇷
CEO Ran Hammer is speaking on the Stable Stage on September 30 at 14:55
Then on October 1, On-chAIn NIGHT kicks off in Gangnam
Register here:
https://luma.com/n61tjj9r?tk=hHgbkT
Orbs is also sponsoring Seoul Index during the week:
https://luma.com/0f9doy66?tk=FAWQYF
Orbs appoints Ran Hammer as CEO, with Nadav Shemesh transitioning to Executive Chairman
Part of Orbs since 2017, Ran has led integrations across the protocol suite. His appointment builds on that leadership as Orbs enters its next chapter
https://www.orbs.com/Ran-Hammer-Takes-the-Helm-at-Orbs/
Four years of KBW nights. Next up: On-ChAIn Night 🌙
Join Orbs, Injective, Stable and Pear for talks, games, dinner and new connections
📅 October 1, 5–8 PM
Grab your spot 👇
https://luma.com/n61tjj9r
Running an Orbs Guardian is now simpler than ever
With the new AWS Marketplace deployment option, Guardians can launch and manage a node with a streamlined setup and far less infrastructure overhead
Start here 👇
https://orbs-doc.gitbook.io/pos/orbs-pos-universe/becoming-the-guardian/setup-node-using-aws-marketplace
❤3👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @OrbsAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ULTRADE Announcements @ULTRADE_Announcement · 29,389 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 276,433 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Forward Protocol @ForwardProtocol · 43,953 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 119,714 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 57,767 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Exverse Announcements @exverse · 33,415 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
TON Diamonds NFT @tondiamonds · 128,633 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
GK Tricks in Hindi @SSC_GK_Tricks_by_adda_247_hindi · 136,278 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orbs Announcements 🌐” (@OrbsAnnouncements), 72,458 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrbsAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.