Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -2,105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74,231–76,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:37
74,547
-90
16 Sept 2026, 23:17
74,637
-87
15 Sept 2026, 04:21
74,724
-73
13 Sept 2026, 16:39
74,797
-95
11 Sept 2026, 19:38
74,892
-119
9 Sept 2026, 07:56
75,011
-166
6 Sept 2026, 01:20
75,177
-120
3 Sept 2026, 21:59
75,297
-76
2 Sept 2026, 11:33
75,373
-56
1 Sept 2026, 12:26
75,429
-49
31 Aug 2026, 12:23
75,478
-56
30 Aug 2026, 15:03
75,534
-39
29 Aug 2026, 13:15
75,573
-35
28 Aug 2026, 16:17
75,608
-35
27 Aug 2026, 14:56
75,643
-53
26 Aug 2026, 15:14
75,696
-50
25 Aug 2026, 15:25
75,746
-54
24 Aug 2026, 13:16
75,800
-74
22 Aug 2026, 23:26
75,874
-76
21 Aug 2026, 12:27
75,950
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.684%
avg views ÷ 74,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.588%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held
24 (11 May 2026 – 10 September 2026)
Views total
2,040
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈444
Videos
≈25
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
35.5%
👍
30
32.3%
🔥
15
16.1%
👏
5
5.38%
🥰
2
2.15%
❤🔥
1
1.08%
🎅
1
1.08%
💯
1
1.08%
😱
1
1.08%
😴
1
1.08%
🤗
1
1.08%
🤝
1
1.08%
🥴
1
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Orbs appoints Ran Hammer as CEO, with Nadav Shemesh transitioning to Executive Chairman
Part of Orbs since 2017, Ran has led integrations across the protocol suite. His appointment builds on that leadership as Orbs enters its next chapter
https://www.orbs.com/Ran-Hammer-Takes-the-Helm-at-Orbs/
Four years of KBW nights. Next up: On-ChAIn Night 🌙
Join Orbs, Injective, Stable and Pear for talks, games, dinner and new connections
📅 October 1, 5–8 PM
Grab your spot 👇
https://luma.com/n61tjj9r
Running an Orbs Guardian is now simpler than ever
With the new AWS Marketplace deployment option, Guardians can launch and manage a node with a streamlined setup and far less infrastructure overhead
Start here 👇
https://orbs-doc.gitbook.io/pos/orbs-pos-universe/becoming-the-guardian/setup-node-using-aws-marketplace
Institutional DeFi is picking up
Compound’s $52M push shows where things are heading. Good to see Ran Hammer and Orbs part of the conversation 👇
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2026/08/17/compound-bets-usd52-million-new-leadership-team-in-switch-to-institutional-focus
The Orbs DAO is officially live 🟣
OIP-9 passed with 350M+ ORBS voting to establish it. The DAO multisig is now in place, protocol roles have moved on-chain, and the docs are live
Catch up here:
Announcement: https://www.orbs.com/OIP-9-Passes-Over-350M-ORBS-Vote-to-Establish-the-Orbs-DAO
Docs: https://docs.orbs.network/v3/governance/orbs-dao
OIP-9 has passed 🥂
Over 350M staked $ORBS voted to place protocol parameters, Guardian certification, network upgrades, and new protocol deployments under community governance
This is a big step for the Orbs community, and more is on the way
TETRA now supports WalletConnect, connecting 500+ wallets including MetaMask, Rabby, Enkrypt, Bitget Wallet, and more
A simpler way to connect and stake $ORBS
Explore the updated experience: https://staking.orbs.network/
OIP-9 is now live: “Establishing the Orbs DAO”
The proposal is up for a community vote over the next 7 days
Have your say ⤵️
https://snapshot.box/#/s:orbs-network.eth/proposal/0x3401d773f66e162766985e531dc50743d321eb2065d8254cfaf1ec0c7a09f43b
Advanced order execution is now available on Ring Protocol! 💍
Orbs-powered dLIMIT and dTWAP bring decentralized limit orders and TWAP execution across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and BNB Chain
https://www.orbs.com/Ring-Protocol-integrates-dLIMIT-and-dTWAP-powered-by-Orbs/
OIP-9: Establishing the Orbs DAO is now open for community discussion 🗳
This proposal establishes the first governance layer of the Orbs DAO, marking the beginning of a progressive transition toward community-led governance
📖 Blog: https://www.orbs.com/Establishing-the-Orbs-DAOs-First-Governance-Layer/
📜 OIP: https://github.com/orbs-network/OIPs/issues/10
TL;DR
- Establishes the Orbs DAO as the project’s first for…
Perpetual Hub Ultra 2.0 is live 🌐
The first integration powered by Orbs’ fully unified, in house perps stack, launched with QuickswapDEX, one of the longest-standing champions of Orbs protocols
A major milestone for the next generation of onchain perps ↓
https://www.orbs.com/QuickSwap-Adopts-Orbs-Perpetual-Hub-Ultra-2-0/
👍2👏2❤1🎅1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @OrbsAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ULTRADE Announcements @ULTRADE_Announcement · 30,405 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 295,924 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Forward Protocol @ForwardProtocol · 45,639 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 124,846 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 59,854 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Exverse Announcements @exverse · 34,493 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
TON Diamonds NFT @tondiamonds · 133,462 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
GK Tricks in Hindi @SSC_GK_Tricks_by_adda_247_hindi · 132,482 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orbs Announcements 🌐” (@OrbsAnnouncements), 74,547 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OrbsAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.