getgems.io — the Home of NFT collections on The Open Network - an ultra-fast, secure, and truly decentralized blockchain network.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/getgemsdotio
Support: @nfton_bot
Created
8 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2,980. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276,203–280,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 00:37
276,650
-241
20 Aug 2026, 19:02
276,891
-221
19 Aug 2026, 19:14
277,112
-158
18 Aug 2026, 18:15
277,270
-173
17 Aug 2026, 16:55
277,443
-280
16 Aug 2026, 08:43
277,723
-261
14 Aug 2026, 20:28
277,984
-311
13 Aug 2026, 09:15
278,295
-122
12 Aug 2026, 11:27
278,417
-151
11 Aug 2026, 08:36
278,568
-215
10 Aug 2026, 05:11
278,783
-161
9 Aug 2026, 03:52
278,944
-135
8 Aug 2026, 05:02
279,079
-155
7 Aug 2026, 04:01
279,234
-384
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
279,618
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:45
279,618
-12
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
279,630
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.79%
avg views ÷ 276,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.732%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
22 (1 June 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
52,490
Reactions total
384
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
604
Videos
30
Links
621
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,792 reactions across 21 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
611
34.1%
🔥
278
15.5%
👍
181
10.1%
😢
100
5.58%
✍
78
4.35%
❤🔥
77
4.30%
⚡
68
3.79%
🤓
62
3.46%
👏
47
2.62%
🐳
32
1.79%
👌
31
1.73%
🎉
29
1.62%
🙏
27
1.51%
🤗
24
1.34%
🆒
23
1.28%
🫡
22
1.23%
🤩
20
1.12%
🦄
20
1.12%
🥰
15
0.837%
🤝
13
0.725%
5 further kinds
34
1.90%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,792reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 21 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @getgems. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😆 Summer’s still here, and so the August Sticker Digest
Stores were cooking non-stop this month — here’s your full roundup 👇
Goodies — drops, memes & workshops
Introduced a new evolving entity named Yum and announced an upcoming Jelly airdrop. Launched their very first TON meme crossover with FAST. Activated Nullie: Chaos & Mayhem recipes in the Forge.
@goodies
VeVe — collection wrapped & Drop 2 teased
Official…
📱 Anonymous Telegram Numbers: a bit of +888 lore
Well before the Telegram Gifts trend kicked off, one of the most successful use cases in blockchain had already emerged. Best of all, it had real utility — Anonymous Telegram Numbers.
👆 Swipe through the cards to catch up on the lore: how the numbers launched and jumped up in price.
🎂🎂🎂
And of course, Happy B-Day to Telegram! 1⃣3⃣ years of evolution from a simple m…
💎 How to buy GRAM
To get started on TON, you’ll usually need a little GRAM — to cover network fees, buy Telegram Gifts, or send an NFT to a friend.
Here are the main ways to buy GRAM 💳
🌀 Centralized and decentralized exchanges
You can buy GRAM on centralized exchanges such as OKX, Bybit, or Gate, etc. These platforms may require identity verification, and your funds will remain on the exchange until you withdraw t…
🤑 "How to withdraw money from Getgems?" — revealing another secret
Rookies often ask: "I sold an NFT, where are my coins on Getgems? How do I withdraw them?".
Plot twist: they’re not there. 🫡
Getgems does not store your money. And honestly, it doesn't want to 😌
That is exactly why there's no internal balance, no "Withdraw" button, and definitely no “your request will be processed within 3 business days.”
During …
😎 Sun-baked July Sticker Digest is here
Stores keep delivering great news, so we’ve gathered the most interesting July events 👇
Goodies — more memes, chats and events!
Dropped the Hat SZN doggo collection and opened the exclusive Teddie Trenches chat for rare sticker holders. Plus, ran burn and Antimatter gathering events to craft rare Glitched Eggs.
@goodies
VeVe — final touches on their debut collection
The t…
💎 Onchain and offchain: where are your gifts stored?
Gifts can have two statuses. This post is for beginners to make it clear how both formats work:
📦 Offchain aka "outside the blockchain"
A gift that "lives" inside the Telegram database. It stays tied to your Telegram account.
Pros: easy transfer within Telegram (the first one after upgrading is free, following ones are 25 Stars each), and you can also trade the…
🐰 Market consensus
Every market finds its sweet spot over time, and Telegram Gifts are no exception.
Starting today, the trading fee for both onchain and offchain gifts is 2%.
Over the past year, we've seen it all: 5% fees, then 0% during the peak hype, and now a moderate 2%.
This fee helps prevent market manipulation, ensures a clean trading environment, and supports our infrastructure 💎
👀 Follow Getgems: Buy S…
💎 Gift minting explained
Last time we talked about TON network fees. Next up: turning Telegram gifts into NFTs 🐈⬛️
Minting — is the process of creating an NFT on the blockchain. The network assigns a unique place in the blockchain to the digital object, turning it into your personal secured property.
⚠️ Why are some Gifts marked as “offchain”?
Not every Telegram Gift is an NFT.
Initially, it may exist in an "of…
🎲 Meet GameBoard
Ruining friendships over Monopoly is a classic. Doing it on your own NFT board? Hits different.
👥 Umbrella Laboratory (creators of Lobsters) presents GameBoard NFT — a collection of 1,500 playable NFT boards for miniPoly, the Monopoly-inspired board game on Telegram. Each board is a fully playable game field featuring one of 47 unique designs, from Cyberpunk to the ultra-rare Anonymous 1/1.
💼 Sal…
💎 Wait… who fast-forwarded to Q3?
So far 2026 brought 407,000+ new users and many updates to Getgems. So that you don't lose anything, here’s the TL;DR 🧠
➡️ Smoother trading: launched offchain Gifts sales in a click via bundles, auto-price reduction "Falling Price", NFT multi-selection, Gift minting via Getgems and Estimated Price right in the TON Wallet.
➡️ For Telegram Stars: added USDT payments! Tip: buying via…
🤠 TON network fees: how they work
Last time we covered royalties, now let’s dive into blockchain gas 👇
Network fee — is a payment for processing transactions. To buy/sell an NFT, you need to have a minimum of 0.3 GRAM on your balance: it's requested by the network's smart contract, and without this gas the transaction won't ride anywhere.
⚠️ What else: upfront fees and returns
You might wonder: "Do I need to pay 0…
👍27❤🔥16🫡12🔥9🙏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @getgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 14,986 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 87 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TON Diamonds NFT @tondiamonds · 136,643 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Battles @battlesjam · 400,452 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
DeDust.io – TON DEX @dedust_en · 69,756 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Grm Official @grmcoinorg · 180,419 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
Orbs Announcements 🌐 @OrbsAnnouncements · 75,950 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
EVAA @evaaprotocol · 272,734 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Ton Raffles En Channel @tonraffles_en · 1,315,581 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
The Daily TON | News @thedailyton · 263,504 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Tonstarter @ton_starter · 825,212 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
xRocket News @xrocketnews · 235,967 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Not Guide @notguide · 478,240 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
Getgems NFT RU @getgemsrus · 110,353 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Fasttoken News @fasttoken_news · 127,915 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
TON Diamonds NFT RUS @tondiamonds_rus · 85,350 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
TON News @new_ton_news · 196,136 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
The Shadow Order @theshadoworder · 305,557 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Trade Notcoin @not_a_trade · 223,161 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Engines of Fury Announcements @EnginesOfFuryNews · 61,190 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
THE OPEN LEAGUE @theopenleague · 154,481 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
The Open Network @tonblockchain · 190,859 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
TON Punks @tonpunks · 306,277 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
QuestHub [News] ex.brobot @brobot · 63,092 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Welcome to $FTON @welcometoFTON · 65,532 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Crypto Bot News @cryptoboten · 1,555,227 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Getgems NFT” (@getgems), 276,650 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getgems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.