Want to buy or sell a large amount of $GRM without moving the price? GRM DEX has OTC for that. You post an offer: how many coins, at what price, the minimum trade and the term. 🤑 The coins go into their own smart contract and wait there for the other side. Whoever takes it fills the offer straight from their wallet – in full or in parts, but never below your minimum. The price is fixed, the pool is not involved, th…

Channel
Grm Official
@grmcoinorg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
176,024subscribers
-6,620 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002040572073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grmcoinorg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 6 February 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grmcoinorg |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 176,024 | -451 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 176,475 | -1,057 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 177,532 | -770 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 178,302 | -307 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 178,609 | -148 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:23 | 178,757 | -216 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 178,973 | -196 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 179,169 | -163 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 179,332 | -154 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 179,486 | -183 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 179,669 | -143 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 179,812 | -160 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 179,972 | -143 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 180,115 | -304 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 180,419 | -222 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 180,641 | -100 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 180,741 | -129 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 180,870 | -229 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 181,099 | -121 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 181,220 | first reading |
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 6 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.70%
- avg views ÷ 176,024 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,760
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (6 February 2024 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 19,020 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 04:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
☺️ Meet GRM DEX! grmdex.org – swap GRM and USDT straight from your own wallet. No accounts, no KYC, no deposits: your coins leave the wallet only for the swap itself. ☺️ GRM has a dollar market again. This time it lives on-chain, on contracts: the GRM/USDT pool is open and the liquidity is in. Here from day one: swaps, liquidity with a share of every trade, block trades (OTC) at a fixed price, and a trading accoun…
GRM DEX is coming. A decentralized exchange for GRM, running on TON contracts: swap GRM and USDT from your own wallet, add liquidity, place offers at your own price. No accounts, no KYC, no deposits. The most evenly distributed token on TON deserves a place to trade built the same way.
gramcoin.org has been rebuilt. One page instead of the old news feed: live GRM price and the full chart since January 2024, holders and supply, the burns, and the story of the project from 2024 to the rebrand – every milestone linked to the original post here. See the all-new gramcoin.org
Gram → Grm Pavel Durov informed me that Telegram had received a DSA complaint from the owner of the GRAM trademark regarding the use of the GRAM name in public projects, channels and resources. The new public name is Grm. The new ticker is GRM. I chose the closest possible option to the original name to preserve recognition without creating a new identity. Only the public name is changing. The token itself remai…
💎 Gram: The Gold of TON Gram is the most decentralized token in the TON ecosystem, with fully transparent distribution. Below you can see how significantly Gram stands out among other TON tokens by the number of liquidity providers on STON.fi (data as of June 30, 2025): • GRAM/TON: 12,838 • STON/TON: 2,387 • USDT/TON: 1,975 • NOT/TON: 1,468 • PX/TON: 335 • FPIBANK/TON: 310 • BUILD/TON: 60 Gram alone has more liqu…
As a developer and founder of Gram, I've always envisioned a dedicated environment to experiment, test new ideas, and rapidly build innovative products based on Telegram Mini Apps. This vision has led me to create The Gram Platform. With cutting-edge neural networks and modern development tools, it's now easier than ever to transform creative concepts into reality. Thanks to Gram's decentralized design and awesome …
🔥 Today, 8 months after the launch of Gram, I made the decision to conclude the mining experiment and burned all tokens of PoW Givers. Burn transaction: tonscan.org/tx/6e620f7f093374dd66dd0eb406875e283d2eea0bea94362e1b2a5cc69ebd68e1 Burned: 2,520,958,617 $GRAM ($8,500,000) Remains tokens: 2,469,183,669 $GRAM Market Cap: $18.4M. -> $9.12M The $GRAM mining is officially over. Thank you to everyone who participated …
Gram DNS is back online. dns.gramcoin.org
💎 Gram has been listed on the EXMO.me exchange. The GRAM/USDT pair has been available for trading since yesterday.
💎 Gram will be listed on Bitget at 11:00 a.m. UTC today! In less than 2 hours, spot trading in the GRAM/USDT pair will begin on Bitget. Withdrawals will be available starting tomorrow, April 3, 12:00 p.m. UTC. Bitget prepared 4 activities with rewards – find out how to participate in each one in this article. Register and participate here: bitget.com/events/intro/c28e5e13c5de52e0ab065550d67cc5e1?color=pinkBlue
❗ Attention to all liquidity providers on STON.fi in The Open League. Beta season of The Open League finished today, so it's time for liquidity providers to claim their rewards and move to new farming pools. Use this guide to learn how to move to new farming pools on STON.fi. ✨ In the new farming season, there are higher rewards for providing liquidity in the GRAM/TON pair: 2,324,538 $GRAM + 50,000 $TON + 5,000 $S…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @grmcoinorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@gramcommunity · 210,674#1
@stonfidex · 741,203#2
@grambestprice · 1,000#3
@tonblockchain · 188,679#4
@notcoin · 8,767,658#5
@cultofnot · 1,035,045#6
@builders · 3,470,622#7
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,133,785#8
@MGRAMGAchannel · 6,649#9
@anon_club · 356,876#10
@league · 1,011,716#11
@gram_pool · 2,630#12
@cryptoboten · 1,489,471#13
@tgbtc · 255,696#14
@opensites · 1,227#15
@ston_fi_ru · 20,357#16
@getgems · 273,021#17
@MyWalletRus · 274,814#18
@MyWalletEng · 298,371#19
@Cryptobantergroup0 · 94,616#20
@DiamondsVpnNews · 15,869#21
@tonfish_tg · 98,065#22
@CarlosLugonesBlog · 1,309#23
@ton_ventures · 1,411#24
@ton_starter · 810,922#25
@cryptobotru · 2,350,536#26
@toncoin_rus · 529,809#27
@FleetAnon · 961#28
@Alphaton_box · 203#29
@DeCenter · 1,849,763#30
@CryptoBotTips · 31,658#31
@thedailyrat · 18,835#32
@theopenleague · 151,509#33
@chief_gram · 345#34
@lhep_jinr · 796#35
@tondiamonds_rus · 83,902#36
@mysail_club · 319#37
@TechAndVibe · 5,173#38
@Arenda_Batumi_Georgia · 409#39
@chudotelecom · 484#40
@hijobli_koylaklar_fasonlar · 608#41
@atmosfera_bgm · 395#42
@ooo_svoya_uk · 283#43
@GemDost · 1,805#44
@in_to_exchange · 395#45
@anatolii_makosov · 18,152#46
@getgemsrus · 109,013#47
@u_drona · 1,112 (as read 20 August 2026)#48
@persopoodelfanasli · 2,196#49
@status7tochka0 · 2,878#50
@karbas_live · 543#51
@altekpublic · 912#52
@zarabotok_doma_internet · 207#53
@filecoinchn · 508#54
@coubnews · 1,206,315#55
@weLoveMondays · 13,043#56
@homewoodspa · 902#57
@luperkalmus · 2,495 (as read 20 August 2026)#58
@gofiretoday · 1,463#59
@philately_ukraine · 577#60
@kosmos_fit · 346#61
@cryptoabc_123 · 224#62
@baqarasurasi · 2,849#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gramcommunity · 210,674
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
@CryptoBotTips · 31,658
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 September 2026
@tonblockchain · 188,679
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
@Cryptobantergroup0 · 94,616
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@dedust_en · 68,595
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grm Official” (@grmcoinorg), 176,024 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grmcoinorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.