Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🦄 Max.ton

Channel

🦄 Max.ton

@gramlow

4 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,053subscribers

-1,185 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002000556732
TypeChannel
Usernames@gramlow @thenotcoin @tonhigh @tonlow
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held112
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gramlow

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,22025,01423,11722,0536 August 20265 September 2026
112 measurements spanning 31 days, net -1,185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,651–25,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 112
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 17:5622,053+32
4 Sept 2026, 13:5922,021+44
4 Sept 2026, 07:1721,977+30
4 Sept 2026, 03:5721,947-5
3 Sept 2026, 19:3521,952-5
2 Sept 2026, 21:4421,957-16
2 Sept 2026, 17:4421,973no change
2 Sept 2026, 16:4221,973-7
2 Sept 2026, 14:3921,980+50
1 Sept 2026, 19:0321,930+5
1 Sept 2026, 17:1321,925-6
1 Sept 2026, 15:1421,931+4
1 Sept 2026, 14:1321,927+72
31 Aug 2026, 16:3521,855-2
31 Aug 2026, 16:2921,857-4
31 Aug 2026, 15:5421,861+3
31 Aug 2026, 14:2821,858+44
30 Aug 2026, 18:3821,814+15
30 Aug 2026, 16:3421,799-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:0721,800first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 22,053 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,510
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held87 (27 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total220,992
Reactions total3,689
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,922 reactions across 82 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,46629.8%
custom 52581389192911018251,19624.3%
👍1,04621.3%
🦄2695.47%
❤‍🔥2525.12%
custom 53755874542899953901923.90%
👎1312.66%
custom 54629224273884035661232.50%
custom 54633533457521795461142.32%
custom 5375374904948449627440.894%
custom 5372869126538701148290.589%
🤬290.589%
😱160.325%
custom 5375185780358554038110.223%
🤯40.081%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 87 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gramlow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC202 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$150 за $10 комсы 😨 Участники "трейдерской мясорубки" в WenLong потратили ~$45 на торговые комиссии, а заберут $460 призовых + 5 стикеров Lambo the Whale. Не представляю как можно до сих пор там не участвовать. А до конца конкурса остаются всего сутки! 🤑 Ворваться в мясорубку

🦄5custom 53728691265387011483👍2👎2😁2custom 53751857803585540382

3 Sept 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,240 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В целом все верно

😁51👍10custom 52581389192911018256🦄2

2 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,730 views77 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

❤️ Все-таки это будет круто, и круто фундаментально. По сути, главная претензия к Телеграм последние годы была в том, что они никак не развивают связку с TON, а кастодиальный Wallet с KYC никак не способствует онбордингу массовой аудитории. 🪙 Теперь эта проблема активно решается. И уже потом можно думать как загонять пресловутый "миллиард юзеров" в крипту. Без этого фундамента TON был обречен оставаться одним из чей

custom 525813891929110182533👍20😁14custom 53728691265387011488🦄2

2 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,890 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Pov: пошиллил в твиттере TON

😁32custom 525813891929110182510custom 53728691265387011486🦄2

2 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,270 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎁 Большинство TON-беливеров подавлены, деморализованы и вообще уничтожены. Именно такой сентимент необходим для начала TON-сезона. В Робингуд тоже поверили только когда кэшкет сходу на 100М капы улетел. Кто-то публично написал, что он потерял веру в TON, кто там пришел с этим ко мне в личку. Если без шуток, то жаль, что Дурикович не понимает, что не стоит терять костяк своего комьюнити. Неважно сколько у тебя миллиа

custom 525813891929110182523👍17😁12🦄9👎6custom 53728691265387011481

1 Sept 2026, 19:54 UTC≈2,300 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#MTONGA !

custom 525813891929110182521😁13👍2

1 Sept 2026, 18:57 UTC≈2,230 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚀 Торгуйте в WenLong прямо в Telegram И благодаря демо-режиму с виртуальным депозитом сможете хвастаться вот такими pnl

😁25🦄6👎5🤬3custom 52581389192911018251custom 53728691265387011481

1 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,270 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Чтобы способствовать децентрализации, бесполезная организация TON Strategy стаканит GRAM. Ну конечно, у них PNL позиции -50%, акции в жопе, а бонусы сотрудникам то надо как-то выплачивать. 🎁 Это не имеет никакого окраса и не то чтобы это какая-то проблема. Стаканят и стаканят. Не забывайте: если они смогли продать, значит кто-то у них купил) 🎁 И в их случае это не значит, что они не верят в GRAM по $10, просто это

🤬26👍13custom 525813891929110182510😁7🤯1custom 54629224273884035661

31 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,430 views35 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Poll

Вы входите в эту группу "избранных юзеров" (я нет)

  1. Да, мне доступен грам кошелек21%
  2. Нет, ничего не поменялось79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁19custom 525813891929110182511🦄5

31 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈2,340 views34 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Знаем мы эти couple of weeks…

custom 525813891929110182522😁10👍2

31 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈2,330 views33 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Выкрутился, чертяга!!!

😁24custom 52581389192911018259

31 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,370 views42 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

💪 Storm Trade выкатил V3 Наконец-то будут моментальные транзакции без необходимости подтверждать каждую в кошельке. Еще и комиссии снизили в два раза! ⚡️ Наблюдайте активно за объемом торгов и токеном $STORM. Как только в TON придет ликвидность, на Шторме будет прилично трейдеров, тк это единственное место, где можно торговать с маржой в $GRAM. 🫡 А FDV сейчас смешные $4 млн. Ждите момент, когда появится дивергенц

❤‍🔥14custom 525813891929110182510😁7👍6👎2custom 53751857803585540382🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @gramlow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTCAnonymous Poll564 voters

Вы входите в эту группу "избранных юзеров" (я нет)

  1. Да, мне доступен грам кошелек21%
  2. Нет, ничего не поменялось79%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lozovsky.ton
@georgelozovsky · 107,744
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
DAOLama NFT Lending
@daolama · 130,086
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Vibes
@saintvibes · 50,704
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
xRocket News RU
@xrocketnewsru · 174,938
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
this is TON
@this_is_TON · 38,396
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Ton Raffles Ru Channel
@tonraffles_ru · 105,131
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Болтоши Болтомото
@boltoshi · 52,269
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
The Daily TON | Новости
@thedailytonrus · 70,918
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Full Metal Jetton
@full_metal_jetton · 43,202
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
TEC
@tecteam · 48,414
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
TON by @korova
@tonkorova · 33,185
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Tonnel Network
@tonnel_en · 163,168
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
$Punk DAO
@daouptown · 157,944
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Wutmu о TON
@WutmuTon · 126,096
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
DYOR.io community RU
@dyorninjaru · 33,053
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
логово ромчика
@togetupblud · 205,314
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
Pixel NEWS
@pixeltemple · 66,948
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Tonstakers RU
@thetonstakers_ru · 149,961
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
TON CIS Hub
@toncishub · 31,676
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
Storm Trade | Новости ⚡️
@storm_trade_news_ru · 551,987
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Новости Web3 | TON Events
@ton_events · 68,108
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Your Premium | Your Notcoin
@premium_not · 44,718
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
GRAM TALK
@TON_crypto_talks · 32,711
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
рост будет бесконечный
@tonbase · 1,579,914
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦄 Max.ton” (@gramlow), 22,053 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gramlow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.