На этой неделе разлочились последние из 2.5 миллионов $SLOW, залоченных 2.5 года назад. Очень быстро пролетело время, даже не верится 🧂 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Каналы: крипта | блог SLOW: график | купить
😱32😁24🤯15🤝6👀4

Channel
@slowpoke_investments
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,975subscribers
-1,733 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002102686070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slowpoke_investments |
| Description | Инвестируем в крипту без спешки и суеты. Канал про TON и не только Slowpoke University: @unislow Slowbro Life: @slowbro_chat Slowpoke Chat: @slowpoke_investments_chat |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slowpoke_investments |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 23,975 | -160 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 24,135 | -68 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 24,203 | -45 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 24,248 | -61 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 24,309 | -63 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 24,372 | -87 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 24,459 | -174 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 24,633 | -106 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 24,739 | -85 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 24,824 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 24,844 | -78 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 24,922 | -86 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 25,008 | -59 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 25,067 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 25,082 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 25,104 | -32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 25,136 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 25,156 | -40 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 25,196 | -29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 25,225 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 January 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 465 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
600 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 126 | 21.0% | |
| ❤ | 98 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 78 | 13.0% | |
| 😱 | 70 | 11.7% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 10.0% | |
| 🤝 | 36 | 6.00% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 5.33% | |
| 🤯 | 23 | 3.83% | |
| 👀 | 19 | 3.17% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 2.33% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 2.00% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 1.83% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.833% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.833% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 0.833% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.667% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.167% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.167% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slowpoke_investments. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 13 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
На этой неделе разлочились последние из 2.5 миллионов $SLOW, залоченных 2.5 года назад. Очень быстро пролетело время, даже не верится 🧂 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Каналы: крипта | блог SLOW: график | купить
😱32😁24🤯15🤝6👀4
Я к вам не по зову сердца, а из соображений морального долга. Осталось меньше недели до окончания лета, а значит, у вас последняя возможность вывести свои jUSDT. В сентябре этот стейбл превратится в тыкву, то бишь в никак не привязанный к доллару мемкоин 🎃 Жаль, конечно, добряков вроде этого, что ещё в 2024 году забыли про тон и оставили десятки тысяч jUSDT на своих кошельках. Но кто же знал, что слова про поддержку…
😢9❤8😭5👍3🤷♀1
Поймал себя на том, что мне СТЫДНО писать здесь про свои покупки в крипте. Неудивительно, что канал постоянно забрасывается 😢 Но я так подумал, чего стыдиться, мы все тут в одной лодке. Так что набираю воздуха, и... На прошлых выходных я докупил XCH 😛 Теперь моя точка выхода в 0 (раздражает, когда это называют твх, то есть точкой входа) чуть ниже $10. Мотивация для покупки - вроде проект не совсем заскамился, так ч…
❤5🤝5👍4🔥1🤔1
Рафаэль Манвелян, автор канала "Слезы Сатоши" говорит Вообще, я скажу, самый рабочий орган в Российской Федерации это налоговый. Не стоит об этом забывать. Потому что все подобные операции, они фиксируются. И если вам не пришло пока письмо счастья, если вы этим занимались, оно обязательно придет. Работают сейчас у них много. Второй рабочий орган это Роскомнадзор. Вот это два самых рабочих органа. Надо отдать должное…
👍16🤬5😱5❤3🤝1
Ничоси! Помните, я писал, что с февраля 2019 $ETH безвылазно второй на коинмаркеткапе? Так вот несколько часов назад эфир в первый раз с тех времён ненадолго опускался на третье место! Жаль, не открыл коинмаркеткап в это время, чтобы запечатлеть, но вот на скринах видно, что в моменте капитализация $ETH была $186.39B, а $USDT - $187.40B, на целый миллиард больше! В удивительное время живём 🤪 P. S. Аж прослезился, к…
🔥11🤯7😱4😁2🤓1
❗️Внимание! Attention! Achtung! שים לב ❗️ Спасибо за внимание! На этом всё! Проходите дальше, товарищи, не задерживайтесь! Это эксперимент. Подробности будут 👏 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Каналы: крипта | блог | флуд SLOW: график | купить
🤔21👀15😱11🔥1😁1
С некоторой тревогой наблюдал за происходящим в DAOLama последние дни. Сейчас наконец смог достать тончики из их пула ликвидности, поэтому поделюсь своими мыслями по поводу этого сервиса 👏 Для тех, кто не знает (если такие есть), DAOLama - это такой ломбард для NFT в TON. Туда люди сдают свои нфт, под их залог получают тоны (в 1.5+ раза меньше флора нфтишки), а через несколько недель возвращают долг с процентами и п…
❤21👍14😱5🤝2🙈1
Соболезную тем, кто лудил на полимаркете на перемирие между Россией и Украиной. Имхо, это просто какой-то пиздец и скам. На скрине сравнение этого перемирия и двух пасхальных. Что считать короткой гуманитарной паузой, а что считать общим перемирием, резолвер, такое ощущение, что выбирает от балды 🤪 Скорее всего снова какие-то друзья Трампа фармят деньги. Вообще фраза "друзья Трампа фармят деньги" - это самое коротко…
😁12👍8🤬5🤝1🤯1
Не хотел расчехлять канал ради мтонги, но наблюдаю совершеннейшее отсутствие аналитических постов у тон-инфлов. Разве что Филя записал стрим в своей закрытке. Так что потратил пару часиков на то, чтобы вам контента немного завезти ❤ Меня на самом деле разбудила не сама мтонга, а некоторые жеттоны. Смотрите, большинство жеттонов росло вместе с тоном. Примеры: $BOLT, $KINGY или $SLOW. С ними всё понятно, эти токены ле…
❤21🔥14🤔10👍4
Инновации в коллективизации Болтовский предложил отличную и свежую штуку! Я бы пошёл дальше: если человек не совершает операций с кошельком год, то его тончики тоже можно отобрать! Скамно? Ну ладно, давайте не будем отбирать, просто заморозим на 4 года, чтобы не мешали памп-энд-дампить. А... хорошо. Ну ладно, давайте не будем трогать тон на кошельках людей, но вот если они бусты не забирают год, то ведь уже можно пр…
😁21🔥5😱3🤝2🙈1
Обращение к ребятам из MyTonWallet Сделайте в read-only моде кнопку "send" серой. Как у тонкипера, а не как сейчас на скринах. А то сейчас скамеры используют ваш кошелёк, чтобы показать, что типа доступ к кошельку получили, вот даже к отправкам доступ имеют 🤪 P. S. Надеюсь кто-нибудь из команды меня читает, но если нет, то перешлите им куда-нибудь, пожалуйста 🙏 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Каналы: крипта | блог | флуд SLOW: график …
👍12❤7🤝5🔥3
Перерыв в вещании Всю неделю после 6 февраля хотел вам написать и про тон как защитный актив, и про странные стеночки на $60,000.01 у битка на бинансе, и про исполнение своих худших ожиданий от рынка в 2024 году, но, к сожалению, из-за необходимости работы по найму нет никаких моральных сил креативить на канале 😭 Так что я в ближайшее время постараюсь сосредоточиться на работе, а когда смогу выйти на стабильные 20-…
❤7🤝7👍3🔥1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @slowpoke_investments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@slowpoke_investments named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Slowpoke Investments” (@slowpoke_investments), 23,975 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slowpoke_investments.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.