Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
329 average views per post against 347,298 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.095%. Across the 480 registered channels in the same cohort — 316,564–997,960 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 2.76% and 18.4%, with a median of 7.46%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured
238 of 238 published in the window (238 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
78,217
Mature posts only
0.096% over 230 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -25,692. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343,444–376,844 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 18:02
347,298
-1,237
15 Sept 2026, 14:01
348,535
-1,101
14 Sept 2026, 02:00
349,636
-1,491
12 Sept 2026, 06:15
351,127
-1,163
10 Sept 2026, 01:20
352,290
-2,129
6 Sept 2026, 14:57
354,419
-1,548
4 Sept 2026, 04:02
355,967
-943
2 Sept 2026, 20:48
356,910
-671
1 Sept 2026, 20:05
357,581
-634
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
358,215
-980
30 Aug 2026, 20:04
359,195
-602
29 Aug 2026, 20:13
359,797
-672
28 Aug 2026, 18:14
360,469
-926
27 Aug 2026, 19:07
361,395
-315
26 Aug 2026, 18:43
361,710
-557
25 Aug 2026, 19:59
362,267
-597
24 Aug 2026, 20:29
362,864
-903
23 Aug 2026, 08:08
363,767
-1,182
21 Aug 2026, 19:58
364,949
-659
20 Aug 2026, 18:13
365,608
first reading
Engagement
391 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.095%
avg views ÷ 347,298 subscribers
Avg views / post
329
238 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.504%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
238
of 391 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 181 of 238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
391 (4 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
78,217
Reactions total
302
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,550
Videos
≈91
Links
≈5,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
447 reactions across 270 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
335
74.9%
🔥
38
8.50%
❤🔥
19
4.25%
👀
12
2.68%
💯
8
1.79%
⚡
7
1.57%
🎉
7
1.57%
👍
7
1.57%
😁
3
0.671%
🤓
3
0.671%
✍
2
0.447%
👏
2
0.447%
🌚
1
0.224%
🕊
1
0.224%
🙈
1
0.224%
🤝
1
0.224%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 272 of the 391 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 391 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚖️ Сотрудники CFTC обратились к криптобиржам с запросом о мерах защиты для контрактов на рынках прогнозирования политической речи.
В своем advisory от 22 сентября регуляторы просят объяснить, как биржи планируют предотвращать манипуляции на этих рынках, в то время как Kalshi продолжает предлагать контракты на подобные события.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
🤖 Alpen сообщает, что искусственный интеллект выявил уязвимость Liquid, в результате которой было похищено $320 млн в биткойнах, всего за один час.
🔍 В своем послевредительном отчете компания объяснила недостаток кеша, а SideSwap добавила, что ордер на 4,000 L-BTC не столкнулся с ограничениями по размеру или скорости.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
🚀 Zcash (ZEC) достиг отметки в $1,600 после того, как 21Shares запустила новые ETP на биржах в Париже и Амстердаме.
📈 Это событие вызвало рост интереса к приватным криптовалютам, о чем сообщило издание ZODL, отмечая повышенное использование функций конфиденциальности.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
📉 Биткоин достиг внутридневного минимума в $83,500 23 сентября, когда доходность 10-летних казначейских облигаций США закрылась на уровне 5,11%, увеличившись на 15 базисных пунктов за одну сессию. Это произошло на фоне более сильных, чем ожидалось, данных по деловой активности, что побудило инвесторов пересмотреть ставки по процентам. В настоящее время биткоин находится в диапазоне $84,000 - $85,000, который Glassnod…
🌕 MoonPay нацелился на приобретение торговой площадки стоимостью $8.7 млрд, однако детали её функционала пока остаются неизвестными.
Планируемая сделка включает в себя PPEX, существующую площадку для частных ценных бумаг. Необходимы регуляторные одобрения и выполнение других условий перед изменением собственности.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
🔧 Cardano представил предложение, которое снижает комиссию на 55%. Однако это решение может негативно сказаться на малых пулах.
Теперь DReps и комитет обсуждают более узкое предложение на 75 ADA; при этом доход делегаторов будет зависеть от тарифов, которые устанавливают пулы.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
📉 Спрос на альткойны сталкивается с угрозой в $18 млрд, так как потоки перемещаются в RWA перпетуальные контракты, в то время как только 19% трейдеров продолжают держать альткойны.
Традиционные активы заполнили пробел в криптообъеме, в то время как участники Hyperliquid остаются в основном сегментированными по своему входному рынку.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
ДО COINCRAFT SHOW ОСТАЛСЯ 1 ДЕНЬ🚀
24 сентября в Москве пройдет COINCRAFT SHOW -
площадка, где соберутся
участники рынка, чтобы обсудить главные изменения и тренды, которые будут определять криптоиндустрию в ближайшее время.
Что будет в фокусе:
⚡️ Регулирование - новые правила и требования для участников рынка
📈 Инвестиции возможности на текущем рынке
📊 Трейдинг - актуальные стратегии и подходы
🤖 AI и Web3 - техн…
🔍 Coinbase обнаружила следы криптовалюты на $1.1 млн, связанные с фишинговым сервисом EvilTokens.
Этот сервис использовал реальный процесс входа в Microsoft для авторизации атакующих сессий и применял искусственный интеллект для выявления платёжных реквизитов в захваченных почтовых ящиках.
@AIRDROP HUNTER CIS
🌐 DAPP
🏦 Центральные банки ЕС выступили против правил MiCA, указывая на проблемы, связанные с массовыми выводами средств из стейблкоинов.
План, который был представлен, предполагает замену обязательных депозитов банков на тесты ликвидности сроком на один и пять дней, что меняет распределение риска выкупа.
⚖️ Это решение может оказать значительное влияние на рынок стейблкоинов и регулирование криптоактивов в Европе.
@AIRD…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 391 posts we hold for @airdrop_hunter_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@airdrop_hunter_public edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AirdropHunter (EN) @airdrop_hunter_en · 75,575 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Engage ADS on Ton @EngageADS · 313,875 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Pro Blockchain @Pro_Blockchain · 160,910 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Petrovskogo @Petrovskogo_V · 154,895 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
CryptoHunter 🎓 @chunterblog · 63,514 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
KRIPTOLOL | Заработок на инвестициях и криптовалюте @airolejon · 242,958 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Tiger 🐅 | Тагир Каримов @CryptoTigerBlog · 29,880 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Cryptorun airdrop @cryptorunio · 58,164 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Coin Side | AI х заработок @coinside_public · 27,382 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Danila Prozorov @danilaprobiz · 22,477 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
ДЕЛАЙ ДЕНЬГИ @to_the_makemoney · 61,345 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
PRO TRADING SQUAD @PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 279,174 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
PRO AI | ПОЛЕЗНЫЙ СОФТ | НОВОСТИ @pro_ai_official · 41,685 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Jetton Game 🍀 @JetTonGameX · 83,613 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
KOSTIUKOV 💲CRYPTO💲 @CRYPTOBYSELF · 24,264 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Иван Красников Life @myflem · 49,143 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
PRO CRYPTO TRADING @PROBTRADING · 47,994 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Evgeniy Shevchenko CRYPTORUN @cryptorun · 128,702 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Semenchuk's thoughts @semenchuk_eng · 326,008 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Dhugaawwan Dinqisiisoo @Amazing_facts33 · 47,678 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
Not Guide [Ru] @notguide_ru · 110,953 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
Псевдо Аналитик @psedvo · 25,728 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 September 2026
Hamster TRUMP 🐹 @hamstertrump · 21,483 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
ChangeNOW Announcements @CNAnnouncements · 122,624 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AirdropHunter (CIS)” (@airdrop_hunter_public), 347,298 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_hunter_public.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.