Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -35,245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 621,971–667,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:36
627,258
-1,948
16 Sept 2026, 03:21
629,206
-1,590
14 Sept 2026, 11:55
630,796
-1,543
12 Sept 2026, 19:38
632,339
-1,512
10 Sept 2026, 23:17
633,851
-2,648
7 Sept 2026, 21:01
636,499
-2,367
4 Sept 2026, 23:58
638,866
-1,615
3 Sept 2026, 04:18
640,481
-850
2 Sept 2026, 02:47
641,331
-901
1 Sept 2026, 02:16
642,232
-792
31 Aug 2026, 04:46
643,024
-1,136
30 Aug 2026, 03:53
644,160
-941
29 Aug 2026, 00:53
645,101
-850
28 Aug 2026, 00:38
645,951
-769
26 Aug 2026, 21:34
646,720
-839
25 Aug 2026, 20:46
647,559
-899
24 Aug 2026, 19:28
648,458
-1,118
23 Aug 2026, 05:58
649,576
-1,516
21 Aug 2026, 16:49
651,092
-663
20 Aug 2026, 13:17
651,755
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
229
Videos
39
Links
219
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
318 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
111
34.9%
🔥
51
16.0%
👍
32
10.1%
🤣
29
9.12%
❤🔥
21
6.60%
👀
16
5.03%
👌
10
3.14%
💯
10
3.14%
🍌
9
2.83%
👏
9
2.83%
🥰
4
1.26%
🐳
3
0.943%
😁
3
0.943%
🙏
3
0.943%
🌚
2
0.629%
💔
2
0.629%
🎉
1
0.314%
😍
1
0.314%
🤗
1
0.314%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 318 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 17 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drive369_dao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2026 to 3 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Most AI projects are building agents you rent.
DRIVE369 is building the infrastructure agents can actually live on.
Private storage.
Edge AI.
Community-owned coordination.
On-chain governance.
Not another AI wrapper.
Not another closed system.
DRIVE369 is a decentralized network for data sovereignty - built for a future where intelligence belongs to people, not centralized authorities.
We were promised that the …
DRIVE369 DAO, powered by $DRIVE, is a decentralized infrastructure for private storage, Edge Al, and autonomous agent coordination. Built on a local-first architecture with CRDT sync, binary P2P protocols, WebGPU acceleration, and tokenized utility,
Drive 369 enables agents to own data, coordinate peer-to-peer, and participate in an independent economic layer.
Cloud AI is becoming the new surveillance layer.
Centralized. Controlled. Watched.
Edge AI is a different path. Local. Private. Yours. Which one are you choosing to drive forward?
Cloud65%
Edge35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Drive369 Tokenomics
69% → Miners
Allocated over 12 years to those who power the network
11.11% → Liquidity
To ensure stability and market depth
9.30% → DAO
For governance and community direction
6.90% → Team
Vesting over 3 years — aligned with long-term growth
3.69% → Alpha (TGE)
Initial distribution at launch
Built for participation.
Designed for the long run.
What if your browser wasn’t just a window —
but a node?
We turned it into one.
→ GPU compute
→ Edge AI network
→ $DRIVE rewards for mining
No setup.
No complexity.
Just one click — on any device.
While you browse, your device contributes.
Processes. Learns. Earns.
This is not theory.
This is decentralized intelligence in motion.
https://alpha.drive369.ai
Right now, AI looks powerful —
but look closer.
It’s centralized.
A handful of companies.
Owning the models.
Owning the infrastructure.
Owning your data.
You use it.
They train on you.
And slowly, control shifts away from the individual.
But this model is fragile.
Because intelligence without ownership
is just dependency at scale.
This won’t last.
The next phase will be different:
Decentralized AI.
User-owne…
❤🔥3🔥2❤1💯1🤗1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drive369_dao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Cloud AI is becoming the new surveillance layer.
Centralized. Controlled. Watched.
Edge AI is a different path. Local. Private. Yours. Which one are you choosing to drive forward?
Cloud65%
Edge35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 3 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tonguard @tonguardaml · 24,548 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
AdsGram @adsgram_ai · 671,143 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
MemeTown News @MemeTownNews · 118,229 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Tap Sport Global @tap_sport_official · 561,448 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Choise.ai News @choise_com · 52,226 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Fluence @fluence_official · 75,404 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
TON MINE APP Channel @Tonmine01channel · 417,359 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
Panda Roll 🐼🎋 Announcements @panda_roll_gg · 120,209 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Antix @antix_in · 81,479 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
TON Map News @tonmap · 252,481 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Siriuspad Announcements @SiriuspadAnnouncements · 21,794 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 September 2026
Airdrop Hunters @airdrophuntersrsv · 167,721 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
$NASDUCK Community @nasduck_official · 226,357 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
TonParty Channel @TonPartyAnn · 404,186 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
AIWire|AI Tools & Money Opportunities @AiWireMoney · 448,168 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
Coin Strategist @Coin_Strategist · 1,038,334 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
WAGMI HUB | News 🗞 @WagmiHub_News · 1,082,622 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Gary the $GOAT 🐐 @GaryGoatCoin · 25,611 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
Corgia Announcement @CorgiaStateAnnouncement · 40,531 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Boxty News @boxty_news · 34,518 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
DogPooper Announcement @DogPooperAnn · 99,164 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
ECONOMY NEWS⚡️ @econ_live · 161,616 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
D3X: All-in-One Web3 Hub @d3x_crypto · 305,307 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Church of The Overseer @aiagentz · 76,014 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 282 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
6 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ghost Drive 369” (@drive369_dao), 627,258 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drive369_dao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.