Official channel of the AdsGram project, a Telegram native advertising system.
Website: https://adsgram.ai
If you are a game publisher and want to start monetizing your game or want to purchase traffic, please read our docs: https://docs.adsgram.ai
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -98,759. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 605,850–734,237 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 16:38
620,664
-753
4 Nov 2026, 15:56
621,417
-1,146
3 Nov 2026, 12:36
622,563
-1,443
2 Nov 2026, 11:39
624,006
-980
1 Nov 2026, 14:36
624,986
-1,484
31 Oct 2026, 12:18
626,470
-1,460
30 Oct 2026, 10:40
627,930
-1,147
29 Oct 2026, 09:11
629,077
-1,400
28 Oct 2026, 07:56
630,477
-1,277
27 Oct 2026, 07:40
631,754
-1,351
26 Oct 2026, 07:09
633,105
-464
25 Oct 2026, 04:26
633,569
-969
24 Oct 2026, 05:05
634,538
-1,165
23 Oct 2026, 04:21
635,703
-1,342
22 Oct 2026, 03:39
637,045
-1,432
20 Oct 2026, 20:17
638,477
-1,450
19 Oct 2026, 16:18
639,927
-1,019
18 Oct 2026, 17:16
640,946
-1,419
17 Oct 2026, 14:57
642,365
-1,076
16 Oct 2026, 17:37
643,441
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.03%
avg views ÷ 620,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,410
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
38 (18 March 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
57,720
Reactions total
686
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 01:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
365
Videos
5
Links
333
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,289 reactions across 38 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,601
60.6%
🔥
395
9.21%
👏
289
6.74%
🥰
243
5.67%
🍌
178
4.15%
🤔
136
3.17%
🌭
61
1.42%
🤩
54
1.26%
💋
44
1.03%
👌
41
0.956%
🤯
39
0.909%
🌚
35
0.816%
👀
22
0.513%
✍
21
0.49%
⚡
19
0.443%
🎉
19
0.443%
👻
17
0.396%
💯
14
0.326%
😍
13
0.303%
🙏
12
0.28%
10 further kinds
36
0.839%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 38 we hold a reading for · 34%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adsgram_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👀 Running Telegram Ads to drive traffic to your website?
One of the biggest challenges is optimizing campaigns for actions that happen outside Telegram, such as registrations, purchases, or sign-ups on your website.
Reminder: AdsGram became the first to bring tCPA optimization to external links in Telegram Ads, helping advertisers optimize campaigns for these conversions.
Want to learn more about this milestone?
B…
Telegram publishers, have you considered adding a bot to your project?
Bots can open up new possibilities for your audience.
The best part? You don't necessarily need coding skills to get started.
Our guide covers:
🤖 Creating a bot with BotFather
⚙️ Setting up no-code automation
💻 Building custom features with Python
Whether you're exploring new ways to engage your audience or looking to streamline everyday tasks…
📉 Cheap traffic doesn’t always mean good traffic.
A campaign can bring plenty of clicks and registrations, but what happens next? Do users activate, come back, and actually convert?
Together with our partners at adskill, we’ve published a new article on Telegram traffic quality analysis, covering the journey from the first click to real business results.
Inside, we break down how to:
🎯 Choose targeting and optimiz…
🚀 AdsGram is first to bring tCPA optimization to external links in Telegram Ads
Until now, advertisers sending Telegram Ads traffic to their own websites couldn’t optimize campaigns toward a target cost per action when conversions happened outside Telegram.
That changes today.
With AdsGram, you can now use tCPA optimization for external links and run campaigns with your website conversions in mind.
How it works:
…
⚡️ThunderWaves x AdsGram — Partnership Announcement!
We're excited to announce our strategic partnership with AdsGram — a leading Telegram advertising platform.
⚡️ThunderWaves is a telegram miniapp where you can get enjoy and get paid even for playing intresting games, completing tasks, refer & earn, daily contests / events & bonus.
🛫AdsGram is a advertising platform helping Telegram Mini Apps, bots, and channels …
👀 Telegram is more than a place to build communities. It’s also a platform where businesses can reach highly relevant audiences through advertising.
According to Telegram’s official ad platform, 1 billion users generate 1 trillion views in public channels every month. That’s a lot of attention — and an opportunity for advertisers to explore.
But how many of you have actually tried Telegram Ads?
⭐️️️️️️️ Tell us in…
💸 Traffic arbitrage: how do you make money from buying traffic?
The idea is simple: you pay to attract users, direct them to an offer, and earn when they take the desired action. But turning that process into profit takes the right strategy.
🎯 It all comes down to choosing the right traffic sources, finding offers that convert, and keeping your ad spend below the revenue you generate.
Whether you're just getting s…
⭐️ Telegram Stars: how much are they worth, and how can you earn from them?
Telegram Stars are used across Telegram to pay for digital goods and services — but how do they actually work when it comes to money?
💰 What’s the price of Telegram Stars in USD?
📈 How can creators and businesses earn Stars?
💸 And how can you withdraw your earnings?
We’ve covered the essentials in our new guide, so you can understand how T…
🎯 Reminder: tCPC & tCPA optimization is available for Telegram Ads
With AdsGram, advertisers can optimize their Telegram Ads campaigns toward a target cost per click or action.
But how does it actually work?
Business Insider takes a closer look at AdsGram’s tCPC and tCPA bidding and explains how these optimization options work for Telegram advertising campaigns.
👉 Read the full article in Business Insider to learn…
📱 Telegram Ads moderation, decoded
Getting your ad rejected can come down to one small detail: a word, a claim, or the way your offer is presented.
Our Telegram Ads Moderation Guide 2026 breaks down common reasons ads get rejected and shows what to check before submitting your campaign.
From ad copy to claims and wording, use this guide to catch potential issues before moderation does.
Save it before launching y…
Want to be the first to know what’s new at AdsGram? 👀
We’re constantly shipping new features, improving the platform, and sharing updates for both advertisers and publishers.
Follow AdsGram on your favorite social channels to stay up to date with product updates, new features, industry news, tips, and more.
Don’t miss the next update! ⚡️
Follow AdsGram:
📱 X (Twitter)
📱 LinkedIn
📱 Instagram
❤214🤔59🥰37🌭19🔥14👀13🍌12🌚5
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @adsgram_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Русские хиты | Музыка | Песни @khity2 · 27,814 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
String Games @stringgames · 22,541 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
dorogo @dorogo · 102,444 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 6 September 2026
Tech Paper @TechPaper · 27,771 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
BOOK OF MEME @BOOK_OF_MEME · 25,474 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 September 2026
Crypto Penetration blog 🔩 @cryptopenetration · 33,550 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
Криптота @degenmur · 20,811 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
TON Инсайдер @TON_ins_ru · 19,601 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
साहित्य - समाधान @SAHITYASAMADHAAN123 · 24,895 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 September 2026
Крипто ТВ @CryproTV_ru · 18,359 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 October 2026
Side Eye News @kolesignal · 19,427 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 September 2026
Блокчейн Барышня @blockchain_baryshnya · 22,691 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 September 2026
قبیله هم فرکانسی ها 💜🌱🤌🏻 @Royataherkhanii · 22,675 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
ادلیست همستر استارز بلوم️ @soloman_190 · 23,466 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
Крипто Тетя @aunt_crypto · 19,185 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
Whales TON @WhalesTON_C · 18,959 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 September 2026
Hoss Invest (Bums - Agent - CityHolder - TimeFarm - Hrum - TinyVerse - GoblinMine ) @airdrop_sign_all · 19,020 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
5 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AdsGram” (@adsgram_ai), 620,664 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adsgram_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.