📉 The demand for altcoins faces a threat of $18 billion as flows move into RWA perpetual contracts, while only 19% of traders continue to hold altcoins. Traditional assets have filled the gap in crypto volume, while Hyperliquid participants remain mostly segmented by their entry market. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP

Channel
AirdropHunter (EN)
@airdrop_hunter_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
75,575subscribers
-4,946 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001892053665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airdrop_hunter_en |
| Description | Airdrop Hunter – marketplace web3 activities!💎 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airdrop_hunter_en |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 75,575 | -227 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 75,802 | -229 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 76,031 | -184 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 76,215 | -240 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 76,455 | -308 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 76,763 | -353 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 77,116 | -213 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 77,329 | -181 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:08 | 77,510 | -161 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 77,671 | -109 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 77,780 | -131 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 77,911 | -131 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 78,042 | -125 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 78,167 | -102 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 78,269 | -127 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 78,396 | -120 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 78,516 | -218 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 78,734 | -172 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 78,906 | -131 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 79,037 | first reading |
Engagement
385 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.057%
- avg views ÷ 75,575 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 43.1
- 238 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.56%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 238
- of 385 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 238 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 385 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,263 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,550
- Videos
- ≈79
- Links
- ≈5,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 72.7% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 385 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 385 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💳 Mastercard announced the expansion of its cryptocurrency program to $25 billion, but it's not all that simple. SoFi is shifting its card program to SoFiUSD, while the amount already credited to the token remains unknown. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
🔍 Coinbase discovered traces of cryptocurrency worth $1.1 million linked to the phishing service EvilTokens. This service used the real Microsoft login process to authorize attackers' sessions and employed artificial intelligence to identify payment details in compromised email accounts. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
🏦 The central banks of the EU opposed the MiCA regulations, pointing out issues related to large-scale withdrawals from stablecoins. The proposed plan suggests replacing mandatory bank deposits with liquidity tests lasting one and five days, which alters the risk distribution for redemptions. ⚖️ This decision could have a significant impact on the stablecoin market and the regulation of crypto assets in Europe. @A…
🚀 The CEO of CryptoQuant, Ki Young Ju, stated that the bullish cycle of Bitcoin is just beginning. However, he predicts that the growth of the first cryptocurrency will be no more than 3-5x, unlike previous cycles where there were parabolic rallies of 10x or more. According to the expert, in the past, "hot money" and the dominance of retail investors contributed to explosive growth, but current conditions may lead t…
🔗 LayerZero supports regulatory-compliant stablecoins for bank adoption. LayerZero has stated that regulatory-compliant stablecoins are key for institutional acceptance. This statement comes after Anchorage selected the OFT standard for cross-chain issuance. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
💰 Circle boosts collaboration with Binance! Circle has announced a new five-year commercial agreement with Binance amid a sharp increase in client balances of the USD Coin (USDC) stablecoin on the exchange. Since the initial agreement, these balances have nearly quintupled. Additionally, Binance has invested $100 million in Circle, highlighting the strengthening of their partnership. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
📈 Prices: BTC: $86 613 ETH: $2 777 POL: $0.107 DDAO: $0.008 🌐 DAPP | Telegram #price #price202609 #price2026
🚨 Large capital outflows from ETFs threaten the fragile growth of Bitcoin to $86,000. 📉 According to analysts, cash flows from the spot asset market and the increase in realized capitalization have improved; however, exposure in futures has also increased, indicating profit-taking. This creates risks for maintaining the current price levels of Bitcoin. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
📈 The Moscow Exchange is launching 5 cryptocurrency perpetual futures amid demand exceeding 600 billion rubles. The contracts automatically refresh and track prices for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and Tron, with settlements conducted in rubles without the delivery of cryptocurrency. @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
🚨 The CLARITY Act needs 11 more Senate votes, but 4 of the existing 49 supporters want to change the bill. Four Republican senators who voted to advance the CLARITY Act on September 15 are also backing a bank-initiated amendment that calls for stricter limits on stablecoin yields. According to Punchbowl News, John Cornyn, John Curtis, Cindy Hyde-Smith, and Lisa Murkowski voted "yes" on a procedural measure that did …
🚀 Bitcoin closed the week of September 20 at $81,178, marking the first weekly close above the 50-week moving average since November 2025. The next day, the price climbed even higher, reaching an intraday high of over $87,000. 📈 This breakout clears one of the most closely monitored technical levels, but the question remains: how sustainable are the purchases at these levels? @AIRDROP HUNTER CIS 🌐 DAPP
Showing the 12 most recent of 385 posts we hold for @airdrop_hunter_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@airdrop_hunter_public · 347,298#1
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#2
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#3
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#4
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#5
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#6
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#7
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#8
@notcoin · 8,643,687#9
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#10
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#11
@clear_feed_media · 508,116#12
@geostakeio · 192,933#13
@gram · 6,689,636#14
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#15
@gameechannel · 1,901,951#16
@watbird · 1,476,557#17
@cultofnot · 1,027,411#18
@Birds_announcement · 1,542,772#19
@tap_sport_official · 561,448#20
@graphdex · 720,061#21
@telegabotua · 275,532#22
@battle_games_com · 2,693,947#23
@drive369_dao · 627,258#24
@hexnio · 1,998,607#25
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#26
@dogs · 7,065,215#27
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#28
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#29
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#30
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#31
@nasduck_official · 226,357#32
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#33
@smpl_app · 1,619,786#34
@Monkey_on_TON · 819,656#35
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#36
@autoruss · 833,622#37
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#38
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#39
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#40
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#41
@catizenann · 3,581,173#42
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#43
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#44
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,147,341#45
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#46
@billion_wallet · 245,958#47
@vestirussia · 986,059#48
@WagmiHub_News · 1,082,622#49
@obixtoken · 529,626#50
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#51
@therealyescoin · 2,089,882#52
@lenvies · 1,562,601#53
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#54
@token_1win · 2,980,801#55
@monorixofficial · 1,336,669#56
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#57
@Pro_Blockchain · 160,910#58
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,084,828#59
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#60
@Coin_Strategist · 1,038,334#61
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#62
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#63
@diamoremarket · 334,895#64
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,498,015#65
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#66
@PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 279,174#67
@tons_base · 486,041#68
@TaskNChannel · 912,667#69
@metazoneofficial · 564,077#70
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#71
@CryptoAirdrop · 547,985#72
@cryptoranknews · 678,604#73
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#74
@combobestchannel · 215,776#75
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#76
@EraOfExplorers · 715,471#77
@builders · 3,431,951#78
@tonmap · 252,481#79
@tabi_ann · 1,922,481#80
@tonbox · 494,662#81
@CloutCoinSol · 965,464#82
@cedex_io · 1,111,320#83
@iamalexfalcon · 3,088,378#84
@banana_update · 1,401,181#85
@JetTonGameX · 83,613#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@airdrop_hunter_public · 347,298
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@Pro_Blockchain · 160,910
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@PROBLOCKCHAINSQUAD · 279,174
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@hamstertrump · 21,640
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AirdropHunter (EN)” (@airdrop_hunter_en), 75,575 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdrop_hunter_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.