Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GRAM Content English

Channel

GRAM Content English

@TONContentEnglish

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

543,649subscribers

-94,754 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002084588861
TypeChannel
Username@TONContentEnglish
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TONContentEnglish

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

543,649638,403591,0266 August 2026 — 638,403 subscribers6 August 2026 — 638,150 subscribers7 August 2026 — 636,863 subscribers8 August 2026 — 635,489 subscribers9 August 2026 — 634,497 subscribers10 August 2026 — 633,419 subscribers11 August 2026 — 631,990 subscribers12 August 2026 — 631,372 subscribers13 August 2026 — 630,004 subscribers14 August 2026 — 628,680 subscribers16 August 2026 — 626,874 subscribers17 August 2026 — 625,137 subscribers18 August 2026 — 623,775 subscribers19 August 2026 — 622,650 subscribers20 August 2026 — 621,826 subscribers21 August 2026 — 620,323 subscribers22 August 2026 — 618,599 subscribers24 August 2026 — 616,179 subscribers25 August 2026 — 614,796 subscribers26 August 2026 — 613,517 subscribers27 August 2026 — 613,021 subscribers28 August 2026 — 611,603 subscribers29 August 2026 — 609,927 subscribers30 August 2026 — 607,877 subscribers31 August 2026 — 606,082 subscribers1 September 2026 — 604,187 subscribers2 September 2026 — 602,387 subscribers4 September 2026 — 599,856 subscribers6 September 2026 — 595,888 subscribers9 September 2026 — 590,449 subscribers12 September 2026 — 587,623 subscribers13 September 2026 — 585,024 subscribers15 September 2026 — 582,726 subscribers17 September 2026 — 579,903 subscribers27 September 2026 — 566,679 subscribers4 October 2026 — 556,413 subscribers9 October 2026 — 550,778 subscribers13 October 2026 — 545,479 subscribers14 October 2026 — 543,649 subscribers6 August 202614 October 2026
39 measurements spanning 70 days, net -94,754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 529,436–652,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 19:21543,649-1,830
13 Oct 2026, 10:40545,479-5,299
9 Oct 2026, 08:36550,778-5,635
4 Oct 2026, 21:57556,413-10,266
27 Sept 2026, 13:40566,679-13,224
17 Sept 2026, 17:16579,903-2,823
15 Sept 2026, 12:17582,726-2,298
13 Sept 2026, 20:01585,024-2,599
12 Sept 2026, 03:55587,623-2,826
9 Sept 2026, 22:18590,449-5,439
6 Sept 2026, 16:39595,888-3,968
4 Sept 2026, 03:20599,856-2,531
2 Sept 2026, 14:44602,387-1,800
1 Sept 2026, 15:13604,187-1,895
31 Aug 2026, 17:56606,082-1,795
30 Aug 2026, 16:43607,877-2,050
29 Aug 2026, 13:16609,927-1,676
28 Aug 2026, 10:47611,603-1,418
27 Aug 2026, 13:28613,021-496
26 Aug 2026, 13:22613,517first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.285%
avg views ÷ 543,649 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.543%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held66 (21 June 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total46,440
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

897 reactions across 60 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤32836.6%
🔥16518.4%
🌭11612.9%
🎉576.35%
👏465.13%
👍394.35%
👀202.23%
✍192.12%
💯192.12%
🥰161.78%
💊151.67%
🍾141.56%
☃121.34%
🏆80.892%
⚡60.669%
🎃40.446%
🕊40.446%
🆒30.334%
👨‍💻30.334%
😎20.223%
1 further kind10.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 61 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TONContentEnglish. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 11 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC629 views4 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @PX_TT42

┌▪️BURN 🔥 ├▪️2,400,000 PX ├──────────────┐ ├▫️View Transaction ├▪️From: └▪️pxburn.ton ​

👍4

10 Oct 2026, 11:06 UTC836 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @pixel_street

The team has sent 4.2M PX to Pavel Durov’s wallet. Welcome to the Pixel Holder community, HBD!

🔥2❤1

10 Oct 2026, 10:51 UTC731 viewsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @PX_TT42

┌▪️SEND ├▪️− 3,210,000 PX ├──────────────┐ ├▫️View Transaction ├▪️From: ├▪️Buyback ├▫️To: └▫️pxburn.ton ​

9 Oct 2026, 11:28 UTC873 views9 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

New skin boxes in Pixel World today 📦 Three collections, everything equips straight into matches and trades on the market from day one Supply: PD: 4 200 Micro Mayhem: 4000 Plunger: 3000 Today, 12:00 UTC After this, the market decides what they're worth. 🏪🏪Market

🔥6👏2💯1

8 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC812 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @notpixel_channel

🤴🤴🤴

❤3

27 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,990 views12 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

👛The Gram wallet is coming in the next update! Or will it be released on his birthday? 🎂

❤8🔥4

27 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈2,050 views7 reactions1 Starread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @thanks_davidVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥4💯2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @TONContentEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

TonDreamer Eng
@TonDreamerEng · 696,974
#1
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,271,388
#2
The Daily TON | News
@thedailyton · 250,715
#3
Walt News (ex. Wallet)
@walt_news · 3,414,885
#4
Anatoly Makosov
@anatoly_makosov · 41,362
#5
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 13,605,725
#6
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,441,101
#7
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,448,731
#8
Hamster Kombat Announcement
@hamster_kombat · 20,311,446
#9
the noton
@thenoton · 674,737
#10
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,492,635
#11
Tomarket Announcement
@tomarket_ai · 6,299,858
#12
Ton Post
@tonpost · 71,134
#13
cultofnot
@cultofnot · 1,002,574
#14
The Signal 24
@the_signal_24 · 5,726,517
#15
Trending Apps
@trendingapps · 3,687,779
#16
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 7,508,047
#17
Web3Key
@Web3key_eng · 426,743
#18
GAMEE Community
@gameechannel · 1,836,941
#19
TON POINTER ENG
@TONPOINTEReng · 515,579
#20
Cryptozon
@monorixofficial · 1,278,601
#21
Nomis | Onchain Reputation Protocol
@nomis_protocol · 1,493,526
#22
Boom: Crypto News
@boomloudcoin · 1,610,757
#23
Not a trader ENG
@NotatraderENG · 465,440
#24
Bitget Wallet Announcements
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,766,801
#25
Yescoin Foundation
@therealyescoin · 2,016,987
#26
Pavel Durov
@durov · 10,402,900
#27
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,326,793
#28
OGCommunity
@OGC_Announcements_Hub · 448,911
#29
ONUS Announcements (English)
@onus_globalchannel · 1,582,056
#30
Cat Gold Miner Announcements
@catgoldminerann · 869,957
#31
Holdcoin Channel
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,086,550
#32
OKX Campaign Announcements | 活动公告
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,172,254
#33
Tonologia Eng
@tonologiaENG · 612,989
#34
Airdrop Finder
@airdropfind · 525,718
#35
Bitget Announcements
@Bitget_Announcements · 1,517,884
#36
Keeper News
@keeper_en · 4,524,357
#37
boop announcements
@boopupdates · 1,258,239
#38
w3_vibes
@W3_Vibes · 5
#39
ODES → All about trading
@odes_ai · 342,358
#40
<\> Sharding, TON's, two Jetons </>.
@ton2keng · 573,359
#41
Gram of TON
@gram · 6,472,054
#42
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,777,999
#43
Builders
@builders · 3,335,312
#44
TON Community
@toncommunitychannel · 736,991
#45
SEED Updates
@seedupdates · 7,745,837
#46
Catapult Extreme
@catapult_extreme · 8,052,816
#47
Dotcoin Community
@dotcoincommunity · 3,811,994
#48
CashFlow‘s Calls
@CashFlowsCalls · 487,005
#49
Crypto Radar (EN)
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 735,487
#50
tapswap community
@tapswapai · 10,018,616
#51
Time Farm News
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,012,540
#52
GOATS Channel
@realgoats_channel · 4,453,000
#53
Vertus Announcements
@the_vertus · 2,073,160
#54
CEX.IO's Official Community Channel
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,403,400
#55
WATCoin
@watbird · 1,422,230
#56
AVACOIN Channel
@avagoldcoin · 1,674,702
#57
PocketFi News
@pocketfi · 1,724,792
#58
PIGS Community
@pigscrew · 2,055,167
#59
HEXN.IO Channel
@hexnio · 1,922,385
#60
Pixelverse.xyz News Channel
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,029,924
#61
$CLOUT | SOL MEMECOIN
@CloutCoinSol · 933,071
#62
Banana Announcement
@banana_update · 1,345,573
#63
TapCoins
@theTapCoins · 2,797,209
#64
TON Station
@tonstationgames · 3,048,264
#65
Медиа Россия
@mediarussia · 1,599,056
#66
Simple Wallet
@smpl_app · 1,562,015
#67
1win Token
@token_1win · 2,870,849
#68
Amio Community
@AmioCommunity · 1,636,968
#69
MetaZone - GIVEAWAYS 🚨
@metazoneofficial · 543,179
#70
Money 💰 Crypto & Finance
@money · 2,799,215
#71
HAYZON
@hayzonn · 2,701,386
#72
Rocky Rabbit Channel
@rockyrabbitio · 3,381,123
#73
Alex Falcon
@iamalexfalcon · 2,948,538
#74
Yes News
@theYescoin_News · 317,210
#75
WAGMI HUB | News 🗞
@WagmiHub_News · 1,050,043
#76
CryptoRank Analytics
@cryptoranknews · 649,483
#77
Crypto Wolf
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,097,452
#78
ONEquest Ann (sub) ⛏️
@ONE_Quest_sub · 50
#79
GemsWall Announcement
@gemswall · 1,342,578
#80
Fintopio News
@fintopionews · 2,151,665
#81
TON Dev News
@tondev_news · 40,707
#82
Athene Network Announcement
@AtheneNetwork_Ann · 705,283
#83
Not Bored Puppies news (Ex-Topcoin)
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,106,224
#84
ChainGPT Official Announcements Channel
@ChainGPTNews · 388,507
#85
AUTO RUSS | Про Тачки
@autoruss · 800,090
#86
Corn Battles🌽⚔️🌽
@corn_battles · 1,008,394
#87
Evan Luthra Alpha
@EvanLuthraVIP · 291,687
#88
TON Status
@tonstatus · 155,081
#89
TON Jobs
@tonhunt · 64,292
#90
Battles
@battlesjam · 380,922
#91

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anatoly Makosov
@anatoly_makosov · 41,362
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Codyfight Announcements
@codyfightnews · 47,917
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Unchained
@unchainedweb3 · 42,873
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
TON Dev News
@tondev_news · 40,707
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Alpha Farm
@alphapham · 34,080
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
OnlyFacts
@only_facts_news · 18,996
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 October 2026
TonNomads
@tonnomads · 24,168
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
Cryptopolitan
@CryptopolitanOfficial · 24,605
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
TonRadar
@tonradarapp · 51,762
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Queens : The best place for Crypto Knowledge!
@CryptoQueensAlpha · 33,728
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Sheikh Bashir Ahmad Sani Sokoto
@Sheikhbashirahmadsokoto · 30,234
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
Gram Analysts
@GramAnalysts · 37,916
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Adda'u Waddawa
@addauwaddawa · 18,754
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026
Filip Trading Community Official
@filiptradingcommunity · 22,324
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Lawrence Oyor's Media
@LawrenceOyor · 49,224
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
$STYLE Official
@styletoken · 45,874
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

crazygames.com1 post · 10 July 2026 – 10 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GRAM Content English” (@TONContentEnglish), 543,649 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TONContentEnglish.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.