Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,302–49,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:21
49,322
-11
15 Sept 2026, 20:00
49,333
-4
14 Sept 2026, 01:40
49,337
-21
12 Sept 2026, 09:38
49,358
-1
10 Sept 2026, 03:38
49,359
-11
6 Sept 2026, 19:21
49,370
-35
4 Sept 2026, 10:16
49,405
-2
2 Sept 2026, 19:57
49,407
+4
1 Sept 2026, 18:38
49,403
+1
31 Aug 2026, 17:14
49,402
-7
30 Aug 2026, 14:25
49,409
-2
29 Aug 2026, 16:13
49,411
-7
28 Aug 2026, 12:52
49,418
-4
27 Aug 2026, 10:29
49,422
-8
26 Aug 2026, 07:24
49,430
+5
25 Aug 2026, 09:37
49,425
-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:08
49,427
-24
22 Aug 2026, 20:25
49,451
-7
21 Aug 2026, 14:06
49,458
+10
20 Aug 2026, 15:53
49,448
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
136
Videos
8
Links
224
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,748 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,035
59.2%
🔥
673
38.5%
👏
13
0.744%
🥰
13
0.744%
👍
11
0.629%
😁
2
0.114%
🤯
1
0.057%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,748 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Global Battle Axe Retreat is ending on a heavy note, and the final session is open to everyone.
If you've been part of Global BAR, you already know it has been one wave of glory after another. Join us this Friday for a 12-Hour Prayer Charge, either virtually or onsite, as we press into all God has prepared for us this season.
📍 Venue: 7 Farayola Layout, Behind Bodija Market, Ibadan
🕕 Time: 6:00 PM
Come hungry and …
In or around the UK? This is an event you shouldn't miss. It will be two days of immense soaking in God's presence.
We have limited spaces available. Register now: https://12hoursprayercharge.eventbrite.co.uk/
GET READY ONTARIO 🇨🇦
Registration for Battle Axe Retreat Canada 2026 is officially OUT!
Come expectant. Come hungry. Come ready for an encounter with God.
📍 Ontario, Canada
📅 August 31st – September 5th, 2026
Scan the QR code or visit bit.ly/BARCANADA26 to register.
In or around Manchester? Join us on May 29 for a powerful time in God's presence. Registration is free but compulsory
https://ukprayercharge.eventbrite.co.uk
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LawrenceOyor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Apostle Joshua Selman Messages 24/7 (Channel) @apostlejoshuaselmanchannel · 30,558 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
Prophetic Chants MEDIA @prophetichants · 29,356 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Revivalhub International @revivalhubinternational · 30,384 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
APOSTLE AROME OSAYI @Apostlearome · 120,308 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lawrence Oyor's Media” (@LawrenceOyor), 49,322 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LawrenceOyor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
