National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 92 days, net +21,042. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99,196–126,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 15:20
123,394
+72
6 Nov 2026, 17:25
123,322
+23
5 Nov 2026, 19:51
123,299
-44
4 Nov 2026, 20:28
123,343
+69
3 Nov 2026, 23:15
123,274
+6
3 Nov 2026, 01:06
123,268
+114
2 Nov 2026, 01:58
123,154
+67
1 Nov 2026, 01:20
123,087
+66
31 Oct 2026, 04:31
123,021
+7
30 Oct 2026, 01:57
123,014
+43
28 Oct 2026, 23:21
122,971
-130
27 Oct 2026, 21:10
123,101
+46
26 Oct 2026, 17:51
123,055
+203
25 Oct 2026, 16:25
122,852
+235
24 Oct 2026, 18:27
122,617
+231
23 Oct 2026, 20:01
122,386
+142
22 Oct 2026, 21:19
122,244
+146
21 Oct 2026, 20:08
122,098
+224
20 Oct 2026, 13:19
121,874
+234
19 Oct 2026, 11:08
121,640
first reading
Engagement
904 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.16%
avg views ÷ 123,394 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,830
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
266
of 904 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
904 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
2,349,940
Reactions total
19,507
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36h 17m
Average length
3m 09s
Measured directly from 691 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66,732 reactions across 902 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28,225
42.3%
🤣
14,042
21.0%
💔
7,906
11.8%
😨
2,605
3.90%
🤡
2,505
3.75%
👍
2,321
3.48%
😢
2,287
3.43%
😱
963
1.44%
🙊
788
1.18%
🤔
564
0.845%
🤪
507
0.76%
👏
502
0.752%
🎉
455
0.682%
😍
379
0.568%
🌚
320
0.48%
💯
248
0.372%
🕊
216
0.324%
🔥
204
0.306%
😘
202
0.303%
🫡
173
0.259%
30 further kinds
1,320
1.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 902 of the 904 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 904 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 902 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Gist_Ng. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 904 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 220 of 266 posts held from the last 30 days (82.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
"Actors Guild I don't want you guys posting my daddy. Nobody should post my daddy's postal. Take it down, let me be the one to announce it"
— Daughter to late Nollywood veterans actor Diewait Ikpechukwu, Chiamaxs, tells bloggers and news posters
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
Veteran Nollywood actor and former footballer, Diewait Ikpechukwu, has di£d at the age of 71.
Ikpechukwu reportedly passed away on Thursday following a prolonged illness, according to a family source.
Details surrounding his d£ath remained unclear as of the time of filing this report.
His passing marks another significant loss to the Nigerian film industry, where he made his mark as an actor.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…
"You want to compare my brain with that of Peter Obi? He ran away from erosion in Anambra and now wants to be president, president of where? Lilikabu"
— President Tinubu
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
"You were credited with the statement that some people told you to turn off the electricity because the things in their freezer are freezing. What are you people really doing there, and what's up with the lies?"
— Legendary actor Kate Henshaw calls out Minister of Power Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe for the recent lack of electricity in the country
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For A…
Fatal accident reported along Oron Road in Akwa Ibom State as a Hilux vehicle collided with a bus conveying women to an event and causing several people to injvre.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
"I'm going to sleep in Akwa Ibom State today. It's going to be a second-term presidential sleep, and I will dream of victory. Vote for me for the sake of your future. I promise you a better future, education and development."
— President Bola Tinubu speaking today in Akwa Ibom State.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
"We witnessed a terrible accident along the Ibadan-Sagamu Expressway, and it's so sad that for about 20 minutes, there was no ambulance or emergency service to come and help them"
— Actor Kunle Afod reports a ghastly auto acc!dent along Ibadan - Sagamu expressway
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
"At the Future Awards 2023, the bouncer bounced me because he doesn't know it's my event. I was not upset but was proud that I could build something and be bounced from it"
— Chude Jideonwo
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
Human rights activist Harrison Gwamnishu has appealed to the public for immediate intervention on behalf of a 15-year-old orphan sleeping in an unfinished building in Rivers State..
According to Harrison, the orphanage girl is currently sleeping in an uncompleted building along Amaechi School Road in Rumuosi, Opposite Rumuagholu Junction, Rivers State.
He further revealed that the girl was hawking drinks for a woma…
Proud Nigerian dad celebrates son as he got enlisted into the US Army.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
NYSC Kidnap Suspects Admit Confessional Statements, Beg Court for Forgiveness
Two men standing trial over the abduction of 20 prospective National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members in Imo State have admitted making written and video-recorded confessional statements to investigators, while pleading with the court to forgive them and order their release.
The defendants, Usman Aliyu and Babangida Aliyu, made the admi…
"Sometimes Nigeria go make you feel like say Bad things na Normal thing"
— Singer Patoranking says as he compares the American's election to the Nigerian election
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💭 Click Here To Join Winsmart Channel For Accurate Betting Tips & Predictions
🚀Also Follow On X
🤝59❤24😢2🌚1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 904 posts we hold for @Gist_Ng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Gist_Ng edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @Gist_Ng as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Gist_Ng named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@haifah_er_abba named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GISTSLOVERSBLOG @gistlover @gistlover · 108,580 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 14 August 2026
Movies & Trailers (TimeBucks.com) @movietrailerstimebucks · 42,037 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gist Ng - Nigeria News & Gossips” (@Gist_Ng), 123,394 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gist_Ng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.