Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net -19,879. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 307,086–332,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 22:41
310,068
-412
23 Oct 2026, 20:36
310,480
-243
22 Oct 2026, 19:30
310,723
-586
21 Oct 2026, 13:44
311,309
-438
20 Oct 2026, 13:34
311,747
-324
19 Oct 2026, 13:31
312,071
-384
18 Oct 2026, 13:29
312,455
-425
17 Oct 2026, 13:15
312,880
-269
16 Oct 2026, 16:39
313,149
-372
15 Oct 2026, 17:29
313,521
-309
14 Oct 2026, 16:15
313,830
-411
13 Oct 2026, 03:40
314,241
-1,104
8 Oct 2026, 22:00
315,345
-1,259
4 Oct 2026, 10:57
316,604
-2,430
26 Sept 2026, 00:20
319,034
-2,147
19 Sept 2026, 04:18
321,181
-479
16 Sept 2026, 18:59
321,660
-369
14 Sept 2026, 19:20
322,029
-405
13 Sept 2026, 07:17
322,434
-529
11 Sept 2026, 10:15
322,963
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.43%
avg views ÷ 310,068 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,440
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
30 (22 April 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
13,320
Reactions total
135
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 00:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,540
Videos
≈157
Links
≈5,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,584 reactions across 30 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
290
18.3%
🤡
251
15.8%
😱
148
9.34%
😁
131
8.27%
🤣
114
7.20%
🙏
97
6.12%
🐳
93
5.87%
🗿
91
5.74%
🍌
77
4.86%
⚡
73
4.61%
🥴
60
3.79%
🆒
56
3.54%
😭
39
2.46%
😨
24
1.52%
😡
15
0.947%
🏆
12
0.758%
🤷♂
11
0.694%
🦄
2
0.126%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,584 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digital_zombies. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📉#Crypto
15 crypto projects whose tokens have lost almost everything
Analysts at Top 7 compiled a list of 15 crypto projects, calling their future prospects into question. According to their estimates, the projects collectively raised $855M in funding, while the total value of assets locked (TVL) across their ecosystems currently stands at around $171M.
Notable examples include:
ZKsync Era: $258M raised in fundin…
👍#POLY
A bot @PolyRadarXbot was recently created that lets you track all activity on Polymarket.
This powerful tool is unrivaled among public bots.
If you are actively trading and want to stay updated on all price movements and trades, this is what you need.
📉#Crypto
According to DefiLlama, the vast majority of chains generate virtually no fees. 514 out of 558 collect less than $1,000 per day.
Only seven blockchains surpassed the $100,000 mark: Solana ($1.09M), TRON ($922,900), BNB Chain ($793,900), Ethereum ($435,000), Bitcoin ($325,600), Base ($114,800), and Robinhood Chain ($100,900).
😎#BTC
Liquid Hacker Demands 10% of Stolen Funds
The attacker, who presented himself as a "white hat hacker," abruptly shifted his tone, accusing Liquid of allegedly allocating a mere $1.5 million (or nothing at all) to protect $5 billion in assets, calling it gross negligence.
The hacker demanded 10% of the stolen funds as a bounty for discovering the vulnerability. He threatened that otherwise, holders would incu…
👾#USDT
Just two keys could put $91 billion in USDT at risk.
Hacken found that compromising just two signing keys could potentially be enough to gain administrative control over USDT on the TRON network—minting new tokens, freezing addresses, and modifying contract parameters.
Moreover, operations execute without any time delay, and there is no on-chain limit on issuance volume. Some keys are also shared across mul…
👍#GRAM
Telegram is launching a non-custodial Gram Wallet.
Pavel Durov announced that Gram Wallet is already available to a limited group of users, and in the coming weeks, it will gradually begin rolling out to the Telegram audience.
Gram Wallet is linked to the account, and the first five transactions each day will be free.
According to Durov, thanks to the new architecture, future wallet updates will not requir…
⚡️#Crypto
July set a new record for monthly crypto card spending: crypto enthusiasts paid for $1.04 billion worth of goods and services using stablecoins.
👾#Crypto
Hackers have stolen 594 BTC from Coldcard Mk3 hardware wallets.
On July 30, around 594.5 BTC (roughly $38 million) was drained from about 500 wallets. Every affected address was single-sig — no multisig or Taproot wallets were involved.
Seed phrases generated on Mk3 devices running firmware 4.0.1–5.0.3 (released since March 2021) may be compromised due to weak entropy (around 72 bits instead of 128+).
In…
🖥#AI
HRL Laboratories has unveiled a silicon quantum processor featuring a cryogenic CMOS controller capable of performing real-time quantum error correction without relying on external room-temperature electronics.
The system architecture consists of an 18-qubit chip, a cryogenic controller, and a superconducting ribbon cable.
According to the researchers, control errors were reduced by a factor of 10 compared to…
👍17🏆7😱7
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @digital_zombies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CryptoNinjas News @cryptoninjas_news_ann · 20,739 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
MoreNews @morenewsxyz · 30,175 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Morph Layer Announcement @MorphL2announcement · 605,994 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Alpha Farm @alphapham · 33,605 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
HSE Update @lokerhseupdate · 24,050 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 September 2026
Allo VIP @allo_xyz · 74,502 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
CEX Alerts @CexAlerts · 51,332 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Wyck of Web3 Alpha @teddyalphas · 74,725 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
CryptoNinjas Trading 🥷🏿 @cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,397 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 September 2026
Artfi Official Announcements @artfi_announcement · 27,629 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
AIRDROP CITY @airdropcity24 · 49,396 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Assisterr @assisterr · 87,994 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
Hemi -- News & Updates @hemi_news · 32,516 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Movewiffrens Updates @movewiffrens · 32,316 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
StratoVM Announcements @StratoVMAnnouncements · 19,616 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 September 2026
Plume @PlumeNetwork · 167,785 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Artefarm Official Announcement @artefarm_game · 18,285 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 October 2026
Develocity Official Channel @DevelocityToken · 56,718 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Faucet Trade @faucet_trade · 352,254 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Inferium Announcement @Inferium_Ann · 52,204 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
TokenPocket @tokenpocket_channel · 97,837 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Bera Bee Catcher Announcement @BeraBeeCatcher_ANN · 59,435 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Cultured @cultured_rwa · 64,391 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
StableJack Announcement @stablejack · 40,088 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digital Zombies” (@digital_zombies), 310,068 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digital_zombies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.