Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -9,406. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363,229–375,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:36
364,640
-615
15 Sept 2026, 14:40
365,255
-281
14 Sept 2026, 00:01
365,536
-638
12 Sept 2026, 03:59
366,174
-613
9 Sept 2026, 21:56
366,787
-642
6 Sept 2026, 17:55
367,429
-720
4 Sept 2026, 04:00
368,149
-399
2 Sept 2026, 20:04
368,548
-491
1 Sept 2026, 16:04
369,039
-604
31 Aug 2026, 16:23
369,643
-157
30 Aug 2026, 18:57
369,800
-310
29 Aug 2026, 17:13
370,110
-443
28 Aug 2026, 15:38
370,553
-193
27 Aug 2026, 14:04
370,746
-185
26 Aug 2026, 16:44
370,931
-305
25 Aug 2026, 15:05
371,236
-328
24 Aug 2026, 15:58
371,564
-366
23 Aug 2026, 03:28
371,930
-362
21 Aug 2026, 16:23
372,292
-286
20 Aug 2026, 14:22
372,578
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 23 July 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.04%
avg views ÷ 364,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,780
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
21 (23 July 2025 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
3,780
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 06:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
49
Links
53
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @faucet_trade. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2025 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
A major update to Drip Tools is now live:
- Multisender is now available to everyone. The service features flexible management settings. From now on, you won't need to pay separately for each of your wallet addresses. Simply paste or upload a list of all your addresses and execute a single swap.
- The new V2 also adds a variety of new testnets: SOL (testnet/devnet), TON (gram), and BTC testnet/signet.
- The transa…
📣 Added Neura testnet
➕ Price — 0.025$/per 1 token (min 1$ for swap)
➡️ Buy tokens from drip.tools
📖 Feedback — @faucet_trade_feedback
✈️ Need help? DM — @bobrov_mlb or @gordon_faucet
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @faucet_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Plume @PlumeNetwork · 174,879 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Nest Announcements @NestCredit · 49,615 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Cultured @cultured_rwa · 67,044 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Assisterr @assisterr · 90,990 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
TokenPocket @tokenpocket_channel · 101,573 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Digital Zombies @digital_zombies · 321,181 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Morph Layer Announcement @MorphL2announcement · 652,234 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Faucet Trade” (@faucet_trade), 364,640 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/faucet_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
