Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GA Crypto

Channel

GA Crypto

@GaCryptOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,507subscribers

-465 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270686109
TypeChannel
Username@GaCryptOfficial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GaCryptOfficial

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,50738,97238,739.56 August 2026 — 38,972 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,972 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,956 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,928 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,910 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,886 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,861 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,828 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,793 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,752 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,703 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,648 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,621 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,599 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,580 subscribers21 August 2026 — 38,540 subscribers22 August 2026 — 38,507 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,437–39,042 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 18:4438,507-33
21 Aug 2026, 08:4438,540-40
20 Aug 2026, 10:0638,580-19
19 Aug 2026, 09:5838,599-22
18 Aug 2026, 08:4838,621-27
17 Aug 2026, 12:0638,648-55
16 Aug 2026, 02:2438,703-49
14 Aug 2026, 10:3838,752-41
12 Aug 2026, 23:3738,793-35
11 Aug 2026, 22:2738,828-33
10 Aug 2026, 19:4438,861-25
9 Aug 2026, 22:1238,886-24
8 Aug 2026, 23:3838,910-18
8 Aug 2026, 00:2038,928-28
6 Aug 2026, 22:2038,956-16
6 Aug 2026, 09:1538,972no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:0738,972first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.70%
avg views ÷ 38,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,350
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.387%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held64 (31 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total214,340
Reactions total830
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

830 reactions across 64 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21926.4%
👌13816.6%
❤‍🔥10012.0%
👍809.64%
🤣759.04%
🔥576.87%
🤪485.78%
😁283.37%
273.25%
🥰172.05%
🌚151.81%
🤩111.33%
👏40.482%
👻40.482%
🌭30.361%
😎20.241%
🫡20.241%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 64 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GaCryptOfficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,100 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026

$CRCL Pumped over 30%+ since First DCA, More DCA i will do if price come to grab final Liq, nearly 50-40$ zone. 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2091049352420847775

👌14

22 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC≈1,830 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Im not overly too much excited, just because btc and eth pump, 👉🏻 Read Full: https://x.com/gacryptoo/status/2090982470724571414?s=46&t=0lGC3015ntoWMD4760fPpg

👌9🤣4

21 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,540 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

This BTC pump could either be a massive bullish shift… or a massive trap. 👀 The next few days will tell us which one it is. Stay prepared for both scenarios. 🎯 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090723947453255817

👌12😁21

21 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC≈2,520 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026

$OTHERSBTC Update 📊 Remember: if you’re expecting a parabolic altcoin rally, alts probably won’t pump the way you expect until their BTC pairs turn bullish. 👉🏻 Read Full: https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090646371552678088

🥰72

21 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC≈2,360 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

I’m doing some DCA on $SUI around here. 👀 $SUI is holding up well, and I think we could see some relief from here. But don’t underestimate the downside, there’s still huge liquidity sitting lower. 🩸 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090641133307306135

👍8

20 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈2,570 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Today’s BTC pump is not ignorable 👀 👉🏻 But: https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090434846648881396

👌13

20 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC≈2,730 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 White House Crypto Summit recap: • President Trump says US considers buying "sizable" amounts of Bitcoin & other crypto. • Trump calls on Congress to pass Crypto Clarity Act. • Trump says US is ensuring it remains the "undisputed leader" in $BTC & crypto. • Hyperliquid $HYPE pumps 15% to $69 after Trump says CFTC is working to bring it to US. • SEC Chair Paul Atkins says "we will ensure that the greatest adva

🤩112

20 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,390 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026

📊 $ETH Bullish & Bearish Case Scenarios Our goal isn't to catch the exact bottom. 🎯 The goal is to buy at a fair & reasonable price while managing risk. 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090296446050566293

👌10

19 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈2,620 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚨 $84K is the key bearish invalidation for $BTC let's suppose, if price pushes toward $84K or slightly breaks above it, the HTF structure could shift bullish. 👉🏻 Read Full: https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090113420301635684

👌15👻43

19 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,390 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

📊 S&P 500 $SPX has reached the brown-box resistance zone. We're also seeing bearish divergence across multiple timeframes, 1D, 3D & 1W. 👀 It may push slightly higher, but I'm expecting a downside move soon. Let's see how price reacts from here 📉 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090107943870156968

❤‍🔥43

19 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈2,220 views8 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

$HYPE 📊 If we see a rejection around $64, I'm expecting this projection to play out. 📉 Let's see how price reacts there. 🎯 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090103753613738384

❤‍🔥53

19 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈2,320 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

So $BTC hits $70K first? 🙃 I see people getting horny again. Relax. Let the daily candle close first. I'm still expecting some capitulation around the current price zone. 📉👀 👉🏻 https://x.com/GACryptoO/status/2090101765563892128

11

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @GaCryptOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 29,876 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Digital Zombies
@digital_zombies · 328,251
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Allo VIP
@allo_xyz · 79,464
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
AIRDROPS.IO 🚀
@airdrops_io · 72,460
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Dill Announcement
@dill_announcement · 60,573
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Wise Advice Signal
@wiseadvicebysumit · 174,621
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Feature earning
@feature_earning · 60,644
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Wyck of Web3 Alpha
@teddyalphas · 80,474
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Caldera 🌋
@calderaofficial · 70,679
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️
@cryptogg · 102,226
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
BNB Chain
@bnbchain · 76,007
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Self Chain
@selfchainxyz · 110,417
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Aethir Announcements
@Aethir_Official · 136,948
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
AirdropAlert-com | Crypto Airdrops for Everyone
@airdrop_alert_dot_com · 202,786
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Grindery.AI 🤖 Updates 📣
@grinderyai · 182,051
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
TokenPocket
@tokenpocket_channel · 104,201
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Assisterr
@assisterr · 93,212
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
Galxe
@galxe · 169,021
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Airdrop BlogSpot (Official)
@airdropblogspot · 211,261
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
The Data Foundation
@datafdn · 59,232
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
LiveArt Announcements
@LiveArtX · 67,239
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
DOP - Official Announcements
@Dop_org · 63,204
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
Seedify.fund Announcements
@seedifyfund · 84,391
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Plume
@PlumeNetwork · 181,357
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Tabraiz Shams
@ShamsTabraiz · 137,517
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GA Crypto” (@GaCryptOfficial), 38,507 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GaCryptOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.