Channel
@OfficialCryptoPatel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,118subscribers
+5,414 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001320804861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OfficialCryptoPatel |
| Description | Welcome to the CP community. We provide you Crypto-Trading Charts, calls, updates & news with high accuracy. DYOR before investing in any cryptos mentioned in the CryptoPatel channel. Retirement: BTC = $1M 🚀 Elliott: @HelpcryptoPatel Paid: @CPMediaTeam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OfficialCryptoPatel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 33,118 | +7,119 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:52 | 25,999 | -81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 26,080 | -181 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 26,261 | -62 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 26,323 | -62 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 26,385 | -47 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 26,432 | -36 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 26,468 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 26,483 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 26,503 | -62 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 26,565 | -41 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 26,606 | -36 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 26,642 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 26,658 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 26,684 | -142 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 26,826 | -160 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 26,986 | -79 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 27,065 | -79 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 27,144 | -52 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 27,196 | first reading |
411 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 411 (4 August 2026 – 5 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,293,917 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
$NEAR +234% From Our Call. We Told You Below $1 & Targets Still $50 🚀 Called The Entry At $1.20–$0.90 ✅ Filled Below $1 Accumulation Zone, Bounced Exactly From $0.90. Now: $3.087 (+234% Up From Our Entry Zone). Hope You’re Enjoying Our Setups. Re-Accumulation Zone If Dip: $1.60–$1.30 My Long-Term Targets: $8 / $17 / $30–$50 Invalidation Still Below $0.80 NFA & DYOR #NEAR
$NOM Down ~99.9% From ATH: Is This The HTF Accumulation Zone For A 10x–30x Move? #NOM Just Pumped ~120% In A Single Weekly Candle And Then Retraced Back To The Same HTF Accumulation Zone. This Is Why I’m More Interested In The Current Support Than Chasing The Pump. Technical Structure ✅ ATH: $2.30 | Macro Drawdown: ~99.9% ✅ HTF Accumulation: $0.0018–$0.0013 ✅ Resistance/Targets: $0.00700/$0.03829/$0.49715 🛑 Invalid…
ETF FLOWS: US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs FLOWS DATA UPDATE (04-09-2026) YESTERDAY 🟩 Bitcoin ETFs: +2,188 $BTC (+$174.60M) 🟩 Ethereum ETFs: +10,775 $ETH (+$26.46M) 🟥 SOLANA ETFs: -51.17K $SOL (-$5.21M) 🟩 HYPE ETFs: +123.65K $HYPE (+$10.52M) 🟩 $AVAX, $DOT, $BNB, $LINK, $DOGE, $HBAR, $LTC Flows Was Zero. TOTAL US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs INFLOW: ≈ +$206.37M U.S. BITCOIN ETFs BOUGHT ~2,188 BTC Worth $174.60M 🇺🇸 BlackRock ETF Has BUYS 1…
$DASH +146% From Our $30 Entry And The Long-Term Target Is Still $500 🚀 We Called $DASH Around $30 And Now It’s Trading At $73.80. That’s Around +146% Profit From Our Entry Zone. Hope You’re Enjoying Our Setups But Remember, Managing A Winning Trade Is Just As Important As Finding The Entry. $DASH Is Now Approaching A Major Resistance Zone: $73–$89. If Price Gets Rejected Here, A Retracement Toward $50–$40 Could B…
🇺🇸 CLARITY Act Could Be Delayed AGAIN The U.S. House just canceled its final two September voting weeks, leaving lawmakers with only 4 days to get work done before the midterms. That puts the CLARITY Act in a much tighter spot. If the Senate changes the bill, the House may need to vote on it again. With so little time left, that could push the final decision into the November lame-duck session. The bill isn’t dead…
As $ZEC went all the way up to $1,025, this trader’s 32.76K $ZEC ($33.57M) short from $444 was down ~$19M at the peak. Currently, the $ZEC short is down $17.77M, while his 1.33K $BTC ($105.77M) long from $77,089 is up $3.09M. 🔴 $ZEC SHORT: -$17.77M 🟢 $BTC LONG: +$3.09M 🔴 Current Net Unrealized PnL: -$14.68M Peak ZEC Short Loss: ~$19.03M
USELESS Pumped 768%… Is A 70% Crash Next? $USELESS is definitely not looking “useless” on the chart. 😄 The token has already pumped ~768% in just 23 days, but the current location is where I would become cautious rather than aggressive. Major Resistance: $0.28–$0.38: Price is approaching a major historical resistance zone. This area could trigger strong profit-taking and rejection. If $USELESS gets rejected here, …
$BTC UPDATE: $83K REJECTION PLAY IS WORKING. $BTC Finally Rejected Again From The $82,250 Level. I Told You Multiple Times — Keep An Eye On $83,000. Since The Rejection, BTC Dumped From $82,250 To $78,600. Hope You Caught Another Short Scalp With A Minimal-Risk Stop Loss. But My Main Setup Has NOT Changed: $83K = Key CHoCH Level. Until BTC Gets A Strong HTF/Weekly Close Above $83K, I’m Still Bearish. Above $83K →…
$ZEC JUST DID THE IMPOSSIBLE: $ZEC finally hit a NEW ALL-TIME HIGH at $1,025, after 8 YEARS & 8 MONTHS. Remember what happened before? $ZEC crashed more than 98% from its 2018 ATH near $900. Everyone called it DEAD. “No recovery.” “ZEC is finished.” “Never coming back.” And now look at it. From ~$16 in 2024 → $1,025 today. That’s roughly a 6,300%+ PUMP in just ~2 years. The market is brutal, but it has an insane…
clan.tech ($CLAN) Full Project Review: From Zero To Now. And What Comes Next. No hype. No shill. Just facts. Let's break it down family. 👇 🔰 What It Actually Is: clan.tech is a Web3 social app for trader communities on Robinhood Chain. Simple version. Traders form groups called Clans. Each Clan has a private chat locked behind a Clan Key. Buy the Key, get inside, trade alongside the group. Sell the Key when you le…
$DASH +86% From Our Zone…Is $500 The Next Destination? $DASH JUST HIT $54.60, That’s +86% From Our Accumulation Zone. I’m Still Bullish On $DASH And My Long-Term Targets Remain: $100 → $200 → $300 → $400 → $500 But For This Bull Rally To Continue, I Want To See $DASH Hold The $30 Support Zone Strong. Above $30 = Bullish Structure Intact. Let’s See How Far $DASH Can Run. 🚀 TA Only. Not Financial Advice. ALWAYS DYO…
$PONS WARNING: Please Read This Before You FOMO 📢 $PONS Is Already Fucking Pumping. From Launch To The Current High, The Chart Shows Roughly 263,432×. Just Imagine: $1 → ~$263,432 $10 → ~$2.63M $100 → ~$26.3M 🤯 YES, Some Early Buyers, Insiders, And Possibly Team-Linked Wallets May Have Made Absolutely Insane Money. But Listen To Me Carefully: I Am Not Telling You To Buy $PONS Here. In Fact, I Would Be Extremely C…
Showing the 12 most recent of 411 posts we hold for @OfficialCryptoPatel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Patel” (@OfficialCryptoPatel), 33,118 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialCryptoPatel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.