Channel
@OfficialCryptoPatel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,743subscribers
-2,961 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001320804861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OfficialCryptoPatel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OfficialCryptoPatel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 24,743 | -20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 24,763 | -23 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 24,786 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 24,799 | -21 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:09 | 24,820 | -26 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 24,846 | -39 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:54 | 24,885 | -53 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 24,938 | -52 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 24,990 | -121 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:19 | 25,111 | -168 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 25,279 | -1,366 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 26,645 | -170 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 26,815 | -109 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 26,924 | -98 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 27,022 | -139 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 27,161 | -2,250 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 29,411 | -3,707 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 33,118 | +7,119 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:52 | 25,999 | -81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 26,080 | first reading |
768 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 768 (4 August 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,923,216 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Oct 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
$MPLX 25X RALLY AGAIN OR A MASSIVE CORRECTION FIRST? #MPLX has already corrected approximately 98% from its October 2024 high, bottomed at $0.0148 in June 2026, and rallied nearly 800% to $0.1328. My Technical Analysis: 🔹 Major Resistance: $0.10 🔹 My Entry Zone: $0.058–$0.042 🔹 Expected Retracement Scenario: 40%–70% 🔹 Invalidation: Weekly close below $0.040 🔹 Macro Target: $1.10 The previous bullish divergence tri…
BNB BURN: $1.19 BILLION IN TOKENS DESTROYED! BNB Chain has completed its 37th quarterly BNB burn, permanently removing 1,646,196.44 $BNB worth approximately $1.197 billion from circulation. ➤ BNB Burned: 1.646 million ➤ Estimated Value: $1.197 billion ➤ Total Supply After Burn: 131.51 million BNB ➤ Long-Term Supply Target: 100 million BNB Bullish for BNB? Reducing token supply could support long-term scarcity if d…
$PHA COULD EXPLODE 4,000%+? PHALA NETWORK BULLISH REVERSAL IN PLAY 🚀 #PHA is showing bullish divergence on the weekly chart, and a breakout above the $0.10 major resistance could trigger a massive bullish rally. Accumulation Zone: $0.040–$0.028 Super Bullish Above: $0.10 Targets: $0.31/$0.80/$1.60 Invalidation: Weekly HTF close below $0.02372. Could $PHA deliver a massive recovery in the next altcoin rally?
J.P. MORGAN PREDICTS 10% ANNUAL RETURNS FOR BITCOIN J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s latest 2027 outlook projects Bitcoin (BTC) to deliver 10% annualized returns over the next 10–15 years, outperforming U.S. large-cap stocks at 7.5% and gold at 5.5%. Risk remains high, with projected volatility of 55%.
FRANCE VOTES TO TAX CRYPTO-TO-STABLECOIN SWAPS AT 31.4% FROM 2027 🇫🇷 France’s National Assembly has narrowly approved a proposal to end tax deferral on certain crypto-to-stablecoin swaps. Vote: 38–37, with 25 abstentions. If enacted, the measure could make qualifying stablecoin swaps taxable from January 1, 2027, even without cashing out into euros. IMPORTANT: This is NOT yet final law. Further legislative approv…
SWITZERLAND APPROVES FIRST SPOT BITCOIN ETF! 🇨🇭 Switzerland’s regulator FINMA has approved its first spot Bitcoin investment fund for retail investors. ✅ Direct BTC exposure ✅ Regulated investment access ✅ Strict custody and risk-protection rules
BREAKING: BITGET TO ENTER THAILAND WITH CRYPTO EXCHANGE ACQUISITION! 🇹🇭 Bitget plans to acquire GMO-Z.com Cryptonomics (Thailand), operator of the licensed Z.com EX crypto exchange. ▪️ Target: Thailand’s crypto market ▪️ Expected closing: October 31, 2026 ▪️ Deal value: Undisclosed ▪️ Status: Pending completion and regulatory approval
BREAKING: MT. GOX DELAYS BITCOIN REPAYMENTS UNTIL 2027! Mt. Gox has officially extended its creditor repayment deadline from October 31, 2026, to October 31, 2027. Why the Delay? ▪️ Incomplete creditor procedures ▪️ Issues with repayment processing ▪️ More time needed to complete distributions What Does This Mean for Bitcoin? The extension may ease immediate concerns about a sudden wave of Mt. Gox-related BTC sell…
$MORPHO BREAKOUT CONFIRMED | TARGETING $6.80 WITH 200% UPSIDE POTENTIAL? #MORPHO has broken above its key resistance, strengthening the bullish HTF structure. Now, I’m watching for continuation toward my higher-timeframe targets. Entry Zone: $2.33–$2.08 Target 1: $4.18 | $6.80 Stop Loss: $2.043 (HTF candle close below) Worst-Case Scenario: If MORPHO/USDT fails to hold above the invalidation level, the bullish setu…
ETF FLOWS: US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs FLOWS DATA UPDATE (19-10-2026) YESTERDAY 🟩 Bitcoin ETFs: +6,439 $BTC (+$526.60M) 🟥 Ethereum ETFs: -43,111 $ETH (-$103.28M) 🟥 SOLANA ETFs: -64.67K $SOL (-$6.72M) 🟥 ZEC ETFs: -9.32K $ZEC (-$10.45M) 🟩 NEAR ETFs: +1.10M $NEAR (+$5.42M) 🟩 LTC ETFs: +9.73K $LTC (+$581.14K) 🟩 $AVAX, $TRX, $DOT, $DOGE, $BNB, $HYPE, $XRP, $LINK, $HBAR Flows Was Zero. TOTAL US SPOT CRYPTO ETFs INFLOW: ≈ +$412.1…
QUBIC HACKED: 2.94 TRILLION $QUBIC REPORTEDLY STOLEN A major security incident has hit the Qubic Layer-1 network, with 1,404 wallets compromised due to reportedly weak randomness in wallet seed generation. KEY DETAILS: Total Drained: 2.94T $QUBIC Estimated Loss: ~$1.3 Million 87.1%: Reportedly immobilized on-chain 12.9%: Transferred to MEXC, where the receiving account was reportedly frozen. Multiple exchanges hav…
CITI JUST PUT $AAVE ON THE $5.5T TOKENIZATION RADAR! Could $AAVE Be Headed For A 2,100% Rally As Tokenized Finance Expands? ✅ First Accumulation Zone: $67–$57 (FILLED) ➡️ Re-Entry Zone: $105–$85 (BIDS PLACED) ➡️ Targets: $330 / $670 / $1,300 ➡️ Target 1: ACHIEVED: 224% PROFIT My Macro Bullish Thesis Is Still Alive. NFA & DYOR
Showing the 12 most recent of 768 posts we hold for @OfficialCryptoPatel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Patel” (@OfficialCryptoPatel), 24,743 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OfficialCryptoPatel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.