We’ve finally decided to create a VIP group, but unlike other channels, ours will be completely free. 🎉 With one important condition — only the first 200 people will be able to join the group. Join: https://t.me/+Vkkq_LtBPNplM2Uy
❤24🎉2🔥2🤩2👍1

Channel
@CryptoRROFFICAIL
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
178,662subscribers
-8,305 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001102446227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoRROFFICAIL |
| Description | Admin 👉🏻 VIP: @Prof1sor PAID AD @Prof1sor |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 28 February 2018 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoRROFFICAIL |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 178,662 | -1,121 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 179,783 | -714 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 180,497 | -345 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 180,842 | -233 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 181,075 | -238 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 181,313 | -307 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 181,620 | -363 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 181,983 | -502 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 182,485 | -249 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 182,734 | -172 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 182,906 | -165 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 183,071 | -135 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 183,206 | -166 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 183,372 | -113 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 183,485 | -144 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 183,629 | -97 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 183,726 | -111 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 183,837 | -208 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 184,045 | -209 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 184,254 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (2 January 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,190 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 23:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2,086 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 881 | 42.2% | |
| 👍 | 407 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 303 | 14.5% | |
| 🎉 | 207 | 9.92% | |
| 🤩 | 195 | 9.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 93 | 4.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoRROFFICAIL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 January 2026 to 4 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
We’ve finally decided to create a VIP group, but unlike other channels, ours will be completely free. 🎉 With one important condition — only the first 200 people will be able to join the group. Join: https://t.me/+Vkkq_LtBPNplM2Uy
❤24🎉2🔥2🤩2👍1
⚪️ LITECOIN HOLDS ABOVE $50 +17% ON THE WEEK — THE BASE IS BUILDING LTC is trading near $52.20 after a 24h high of $53.47. Market cap back above $4B, price up roughly 17% from $44.35 one week ago. THE STRUCTURE : 🔹 $50 flipped from resistance to support — the whole thesis rests here 🔹 LTC cleared $46.59, $48.04 and $50.87 in succession — heavy overhead supply now absorbed 🔹 Buyers control 76% of 24h flow THE FUE…
❤72🔥29👍27❤🔥19🎉9🤩6
#ETH Channel Retest Before Expansion 🚀📈 Ethereum is still moving inside a massive rising channel on the monthly timeframe 🔍 After the recent correction, price is approaching a critical support region near the lower trendline and the mid-channel support zone 👀 The current structure suggests a possible liquidity sweep before continuation toward higher levels. 🎯 Bullish targets after confirmation: ➡️ $5,978 ➡️ $6,86…
❤99👍51🔥48🎉42❤🔥29🤩18
Bitcoin is holding above a critical demand zone (60K – 64K) while reacting from the 0.786 Fibonacci level — a classic reversal area 🔍 📊 Technical Structure: ✔️ Strong higher timeframe uptrend intact ✔️ Deep correction → potential accumulation ✔️ Early bounce forming 📈 Next targets: 🎯 115,996$ 🎯 135,069$ 🎯 154,602$ ⚠️ Invalidation: Daily close below 59K @CryptoRROFFICAIL
❤95🤩55👍54🔥50🎉29
#BTC / USDT Bitcoin is approaching a strong demand zone around $60K–$64K after a deep correction 📉 This area aligns with the 0.786 Fibonacci level, making it a key region for a potential reversal. 📈 Targets after bounce: 🎯 $115,996 🎯 $135,069 🎯 $154,602 As long as price holds above the demand zone, the bullish recovery scenario remains valid 🚀 @CryptoRROFFICAIL
❤85👍44🎉38🔥37❤🔥19🤩18
#AVAX Avalanche is testing the lower boundary of a long-term descending channel, where a potential bottom structure is forming 👀 Price is showing early signs of stabilization near key support, which could trigger a strong reversal if buyers step in. 🎯 Targets: $54 → $72 → $90 As long as price holds the current support zone, the bullish reversal scenario remains valid. 🚀 @CryptoRROFFICAIL
👍51❤46🎉18❤🔥17🤩14🔥13
#LINK $LINK Monthly timeframe approaching a major demand zone around $5.58 📍 Price is compressing at support after a prolonged downtrend, forming a potential base. If this level holds, we could see a strong rebound toward the higher resistance zones. 🎯 Target 1: $27.62 🎯 Target 2: $33.97 🎯 Target 3: $40.68 Patience here — this is a high timeframe setup. @CryptoRROFFICAIL
❤48👍20🤩16🔥13🎉8
#SUI $SUI Descending structure into major demand zone ✅ Price is approaching strong monthly support around 0.57 – key reaction level 👀 Watching for a reversal from this area. 🎯 Target 1: 4.2928 🎯 Target 2: 5.5457 🎯 Target 3: 6.6550 Patience here — this zone could define the next big move. 🚀 @CryptoRROFFICAIL
🎉20❤17🤩10🔥9👍5❤🔥2
#BCH USDT 📊 $BCH Weekly descending channel still in play, but price is holding the mid-range support area. If we get a clean breakout above the channel resistance, momentum could accelerate quickly 🚀 🎯 Target 1: 735.9$ 🎯 Target 2: 859.5$ 🎯 Target 3: 950$ As long as the current structure holds, this looks like a potential trend continuation setup. Patience around the breakout zone is key. @CryptoRROFFICAIL
🔥29❤21👍14🎉3❤🔥1
$PUMP/USDT #PUMP Descending structure still in play 📉 Price is hovering around a key demand zone and trendline confluence 👀 If this level holds, we could see a strong reversal move. 🎯 Target 1: 0.005506 🎯 Target 2: 0.006857 🎯 Target 3: 0.008140 Invalidation below the demand zone. Patience here is key. @CryptoRROFFICAIL
❤23🔥10🎉2
Bitcoin Technical Update : All eyes are now on whether this cluster will hold alongside the 200-week moving average. This cluster represents a confluence of multiple trendlines drawn on a logarithmic scale, making it a highly significant technical zone. If this area holds, it could act as a macro support base and fuel a recovery. A failure, however, would signal structural weakness and open the door for deeper dow…
❤33👍20🔥10🤩4
#LTC /USDT Long-term accumulation range is still intact ✅ Price is holding above the rising macro support trendline, which has been respected multiple times in the past. This structure suggests smart money accumulation rather than distribution 👀 If momentum kicks in, Litecoin could be setting up for a strong expansion move 📈 🎯 Target 1: 131.13$ 🎯 Target 2: 188.79$ 🎯 Target 3: 271.47$ Patience pays in ranges like…
❤46🔥23👍8🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoRROFFICAIL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 115 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto VIP ЯR ™” (@CryptoRROFFICAIL), 178,662 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoRROFFICAIL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.