متبقي 2️⃣4️⃣ ساعة ⏰

Channel
Dr. Assad Rizq | غرفة العمليات
@assadrizqmoneyteam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,303subscribers
-604 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352303687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @assadrizqmoneyteam |
| Description | 🇸🇦🧠 رائد أعمال كريبتو | طبيب مخ وأعصاب مؤسس ومستثمر في عدة مشاريع ما اذكر ليس نصيحة لأصحاب رؤوس الأموال 👇 https://assad.rizqchallenge.com/vsl |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/assadrizqmoneyteam |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 60,303 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 60,349 | -78 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 60,427 | -65 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 60,492 | -71 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 60,563 | -84 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 60,647 | +9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 60,638 | +18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:33 | 60,620 | -32 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:07 | 60,652 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 60,667 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 60,681 | +65 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 60,616 | -23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 60,639 | -39 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 60,678 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 60,683 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 60,690 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 60,733 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 60,731 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 60,720 | +63 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 60,657 | first reading |
Engagement
220 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.59%
- avg views ÷ 60,303 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,370
- 119 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 119
- of 220 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 220 (23 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 400,830 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,300
- Videos
- ≈61
- Links
- ≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
عرض اليوم الوطني السعودي 🇸🇦 مجتمع مسرع الثروات/ قناة التداول الخاصة ٦٩$ بدلاً من ٩٩$ 🚨🚨 متبقي لإنتهاء العرض 24 ساعة https://www.skool.com/wealth-accelerator-6048
⚠️ للتذكير ومنعاً للإحراج 👇
😎 الحمد لله WLDUSDT هل تعلم عزيزي المتابع اننا نشرنا هذه العمله ثلاث مرات وما شاء الله حققت هاتريك اسرع عمله بتحقيق الهدف الاول .. وهذه اول مره تحصل بتاريخ مجتمعنا ✅الهدف الأول 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 3.37 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله ETHUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 24.4 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله ETHUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث ✅✅✅✅ الهدف الرابع ✅✅✅✅✅ الهدف الخامس 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 50.8 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله ETHUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 28.6 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله APTUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث ✅✅✅✅ الهدف الرابع ✅✅✅✅✅ الهدف الخامس 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 45.6 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله BCHUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث ✅✅✅✅ الهدف الرابع ✅✅✅✅✅ الهدف الخامس 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 51.3 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله OPUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث ✅✅✅✅ الهدف الرابع 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 33.3 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله ARBUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث ✅✅✅✅ الهدف الرابع ✅✅✅✅✅ الهدف الخامس 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 60 (من دون رافعة 😉)
😎 الحمد لله FETUSDT ✅الهدف الأول ✅✅ الهدف الثاني ✅✅✅ الهدف الثالث 🟢🔥 ارتفاع :% 27.6 (من دون رافعة 😉)
Showing the 12 most recent of 220 posts we hold for @assadrizqmoneyteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اداء Mercedes-Benz S class في البر ⛺️
- السيارة قوية وتتحمل26%
- السيارة قوية لكنها غير مصممة للبر77%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 220 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cryptomena1 · 104,708#1
@EATrading1 · 251,505#2
@crypto_currencyME · 104,544#3
@lafichart · 35,119#4
@inv7mind · 22,063#5
@jemyjrcrypto7 · 12,612#6
@crypto_News24_Z · 29,289#7
@cr_halal · 107,341#8
@theeasycrypto · 8,596#9
@Adamkamal144 · 46,525#10
@abramchart · 25,509#11
@badwicrypto · 8,215#12
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 34,256#13
@Abod_Cryptocurrency · 11,059#14
@cryptoniteTrades · 6,154#15
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,784#16
@ForexBreakingNews · 367,847#17
@OfficialZcrypto · 11,221#18
@abusalamachart · 11,169#19
@Cryptocurrencyy9 · 70,200#20
@shimaaFuture3 · 31,003#21
@ChampsCryptoPublic · 4,124#22
@scalping_Signalss · 24,493#23
@ahmadcharts · 16,110#24
@traderbrother0 · 7,651#25
@elcopttanchannel · 4,401#26
@scienceweb1 · 16,478#27
@Whale200 · 11,326#28
@EMARATI_ae · 19,066#29
@mrcryptoyyt · 37,477#30
@Cryp2me · 17,258#31
@Hamam74 · 49,651#32
@Mfanni · 19,228#33
@Ramooscrypto · 4,741#34
@Wolf_Trader11 · 11,553#35
@scalping_Midd · 18,703#36
@TH3Whales · 10,505#37
@CryptoArabic005 · 5,490#38
@fxbalA · 21,813#39
@cryptobadr · 119,432#40
@AlsaqaehMain · 9,802#41
@vacahsb1825 · 16,151#42
@shimaa_Feactal_Vip · 17,104#43
@Private_Traders_Club · 2,887#44
@leacked_coursesVIP · 45,868#45
@talbalel · 18,287#46
@Fractal_Hatem · 4,246#47
@arabpersonalfinance · 6,055#48
@Arabbtc_net · 7,879#49
@Omar_Crypto · 6,372#50
@the_future_111 · 42,141#51
@Alwegdani · 12,820#52
@cryptochini_cafe · 4,378#53
@crypto1kingdom · 7,925#54
@ZiadCharts · 3,188#55
@caesartrading · 4,372#56
@MKMALYVIP · 19,478#57
@CrypoIslam · 48,348#58
@crypnfttrader · 2,853#59
@CryptoHorizon_News · 5,652#60
@Sinjar2024 · 31,240#61
@GCB_Signals · 5,239#62
@withmonis · 7,120#63
@protrading36 · 21,751#64
@Mshary_chart0 · 3,820#65
@businessma7room · 47,462#66
@crypto_ahmd · 7,866#67
@Learn_With_Shaimmaa · 11,584#68
@BitcoinNews_24 · 9,947#69
@Crypto_Trend_11 · 3,581#70
@Hamamm74 · 4,734#71
@CryptoHorizon_Trading · 4,861#72
@PROFIT_717 · 2,484#73
@hadibrayteh · 48,978#74
@LXInsights · 6,251#75
@GhaziCrypto · 9,358#76
@crypto_trade_pros · 2,966#77
@BooooooooMmmmmmmmm · 6,793#78
@limarcurrencies · 4,401#79
@mehmetwehbe · 74,886#80
@omaralhyni · 3,238#81
@Mamdouh_Zaki_Trading · 4,604#82
@btcalarabs · 18,852#83
@F_35cu · 25,210#84
@qusai_crypto · 19,764#85
@fx_news_34 · 77,309#86
@arabcharts · 5,353#87
@CRYPTO_TO_HOLD · 15,742#88
@inv7mindforex · 9,891#89
@YD_Cryptocurrency · 13,559#90
@PAIDROSE · 141,486#91
@tawsyatFadiAbdoOnBitcoin · 9,075#92
@SolBoPortal · 1,734#93
@dogs · 7,065,215#94
@XmindsCoin · 3,280#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@adelacademy · 89,721
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
@EACoinTalk · 27,333
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
@cryptomena1 · 104,708
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@MrAmwal · 21,813
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
@inv7mind · 22,063
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
@the_future_111 · 42,141
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@EATrading1 · 251,505
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@matagrcom · 24,687
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@memphis_tours · 30,481
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 7 September 2026
@Alfaydaeconomy · 28,342
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
@hadibrayteh · 48,978
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@SarfToday · 65,595
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
@mehmetwehbe · 74,886
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@fxbalA · 21,813
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
@mrz_s1 · 63,733
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
@cr_halal · 107,341
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@cryptobadr · 119,432
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@wo_future · 68,654
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,814
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@crypto_q88 · 24,531
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
@cryptochat22 · 101,197
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@lafichart · 35,119
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@crypto_currencyME · 104,544
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@Hamam74 · 49,651
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Assad Rizq | غرفة العمليات” (@assadrizqmoneyteam), 60,303 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/assadrizqmoneyteam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.