23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,518–16,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 13:56
16,542
-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:45
16,546
-6
28 Aug 2026, 12:37
16,552
-13
27 Aug 2026, 11:58
16,565
-1
26 Aug 2026, 14:37
16,566
-6
25 Aug 2026, 17:42
16,572
-8
24 Aug 2026, 19:39
16,580
-15
23 Aug 2026, 03:04
16,595
-9
21 Aug 2026, 17:38
16,604
-12
20 Aug 2026, 12:17
16,616
-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:45
16,622
-7
18 Aug 2026, 14:24
16,629
-9
17 Aug 2026, 11:48
16,638
-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:47
16,642
-5
14 Aug 2026, 09:49
16,647
-7
13 Aug 2026, 03:53
16,654
-6
12 Aug 2026, 05:22
16,660
-16
11 Aug 2026, 08:46
16,676
-8
10 Aug 2026, 11:31
16,684
-11
8 Aug 2026, 08:35
16,695
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 16,542 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
47 (16 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
114,381
Reactions total
2,532
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
586
Videos
13
Links
253
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,759 reactions across 47 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,625
55.2%
👍
1,149
24.1%
🤔
785
16.5%
🙏
69
1.45%
👏
59
1.24%
🫡
46
0.967%
😍
25
0.525%
😘
1
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,759reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 47 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scienceweb1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
هذه المرة، سيكون للعملات البديلة النصيب الأكبر من الصعود، على عكس ما حدث عندما وصل البيتكوين إلى 126 ألف دولار. لا يمكن أن يستمر السوق بالتركيز على البيتكوين وحده وتهميش العملات البديلة، فهي جزء أساسي من تطور هذا المجال. البيتكوين والعملات البديلة يكملان بعضهما، وصناع السوق يكسبون منها أكثر من البيتكوين نفسه
فيديو الآن ❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥
عملة ZRO ومع التحول الكبير الذي يشهده المشروع.. هل يمكن أن تصل إلى 50$ أو أكثر؟ وهل تكون واحدة من أكبر الفرص في سوق العملات الرقمية!🚀
مشاهدة الفيديو على YouTube
⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://youtu.be/whpZR8sys7M?si=6HbbbP7yfYuN2HmZ
❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥
مشروع zro مقبل على تحول ضخم مع إطلاق بلوكشين Layer 1 خاص به باسم Zero، والأهم أن الفريق لن يطلق عملة جديدة للشبكة، بل ستبقى ZRO هي العملة الأساسية للمنظومة.
وفوق كل هذا يأتي مشروع ATLAS، البنية الضخمة المبنية على Zero، والتي ستتيح لمنصات التداول والأسواق بناء خدماتها فوقها.
ترقبوا اليوم واحدة من أهم الحلقات على القناة
سأشرح بالتفصيل هذا التحول الكبير في مشروع LayerZero، وما دور ZRO في المنظومة الجديدة، وهل يمكن فع…
من الممكن أن يستمر هذا التذبذب بين 76K و82K، حتى يستفيدوا أكثر من تصفيات صفقات الفيوتشر. وأرى أن التصفية الكبرى قد تحدث عند اختراق قوي لمستوى 83K، ليتجه البيتكوين بعدها بشكل مباشر نحو 90K، لأن أحد أهم أهداف صناع السوق هو استهداف مناطق السيولة وتصفية صفقات الفيوتشر.
وإذا حدث هذا السيناريو، فقد تتجاوز شدة تصفيات صفقات Short الى اكثر من 1.4 مليار دولار.
الآن أصبح الاختلاف واضحًا : أي حركة صعود بسيطة للبيتكوين أصبحت تدفع العملات البديلة للصعود بنسب أكبر، على عكس ما كان يحدث عندما كان البيتكوين في طريقه نحو 126 ألف دولار، حيث كانت السيولة متركزة بشكل أكبر في البيتكوين، وهذه المرة أرى أن الفرصة والأولوية ستكون للعملات البديلة أكثر من البيتكوين نفسه
عملة Sonic (S) من المشاريع التي أراقبها حالياً رغم تراجعها الكبير. الفريق اعترف بمشكلة تراجع السيولة وبدأ بتغيير استراتيجيته بالكامل.
يركز حالياً على المدفوعات وFX، الذكاء الاصطناعي، RWA وأسواق التوقعات، مع العمل على تطوير منتجات تحقق استخداماً وإيرادات حقيقية للشبكة.
المشروع يمتلك بلوكشين قوياً، وأرى أنه في حال نجاح الاستراتيجية الجديدة واستعادة السيولة والنشاط، يمكن أن تعود عملة S إلى أسعار ممتازة مستقبلاً
السوق شكّل قاعه منذ فترة، وكما ذكرنا، في أوقات الأزمات غالبا ما يكون السوق عند القاع أو قريبا منه. أما من ينتظر البيتكوين تحت 40 ألف دولار، فيجب أن يأخذ بعين الاعتبار أن هذه المستويات ستضع ضغطاً كبيراً على قطاع التعدين، خصوصاً المعدنين ذوي تكاليف التشغيل المرتفعة. وحتى إذا افترضنا سيناريو تصحيح قوي ووصل البيتكوين إلى حدود 40K، فأرى أنها ستكون منطقة هبوط حاد يتبعها ارتداد قوي، كما حدث خلال أزمة كورونا. بالنسبة لي، ال…
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
الشيء الجيد في هذا الصعود هو خروج السيولة من البيتكوين ودخولها إلى العملات البديلة، حيث نشهد تناوباً واضحاً في السيولة بين البيتكوين والعملات البديلة، وهذا ما حدث أيضاً خلال صعود 2021، على عكس ما حدث عندما وصل سعر البيتكوين إلى 126 ألف دولار، حيث لم تستفد معظم العملات البديلة من صعوده بالشكل نفسه
كان الجميع يقول إن صعود السوق مرتبط بنهاية رئاسة ترامب، لكن ترامب اعتمد بشكل كبير على مجتمع الكريبتو خلال حملته الانتخابية، ورأى أنه قد يخسر شريحة كبيرة من هذا الجمهور الداعم للحزب الجمهوري، لذلك قرر العودة بقوة لدعم الكريبتو في هذا التوقيت ودفع السوق نحو الصعود، بهدف الحفاظ على دعم مجتمع الكريبتو للحزب الجمهوري
❤65👍28🤔19👏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @scienceweb1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr. Assad Rizq | غرفة العمليات @assadrizqmoneyteam · 60,681 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Adam kamal @Adamkamal144 · 46,426 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
CRYPTOHALAL كريبتو حلال @cr_halal · 108,036 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
NaiF CHarT @cryptomena1 · 105,554 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
مجتمع العملات الموثوقة @cryptobadr · 135,940 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Science web” (@scienceweb1), 16,542 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scienceweb1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.