العين على اختراق ال 82K 🟢 العملات راح تفعّل وضع الطيران بعدها ، و سيكون لها نصيب الأسد في الصعود البتكوين لن يبتعد كثيرا لانه سبق الجميع بالصعود أصلا

Channel
LAFI CHART
@lafichart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,541subscribers
-1,168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001216496535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lafichart |
| Description | تحليل فني و توصيات في سوق العملات الرقمية إن أصبت فبتوفيق الله ، إدارة محفظتك مسؤوليتك 🔴 احذر من اي شخص يدخلك في الخاص ينتحل الإسم و الصورة حساب الإشتراكات الرسمي و الوحيد : @lafichartvip حساب تويتر : https://twitter.com/Lafichart?s=09 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lafichart |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 34,541 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:49 | 34,553 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:38 | 34,568 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:08 | 34,579 | -19 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 34,598 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 34,613 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 34,629 | -26 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 34,655 | -18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 34,673 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 34,686 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 34,698 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:26 | 34,707 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:16 | 34,711 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 34,719 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 34,735 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 34,734 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 34,746 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 34,764 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 34,775 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 34,786 | first reading |
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.6%
- avg views ÷ 34,541 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,810
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (24 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 304,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,180
- Videos
- ≈3
- Links
- ≈284
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (2.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
السوق اليوم يعود لمستويات أمس بضغط من السوق الأمريكي و السلوك هذا الي امامكم واحد من طرق البتكوين في تشكيل القاع ... اليوم البتكوين نزل اسفل مستويات امس بشيء بسيط بينما الإيثر ( يمين ) يحافظ على قاع امس 🟢 و هذا انا اعتبره دايفرجنس ايجابي في سلوق السوق بشكل عام ( اشارة ضعف للبائعين ) 🟢 السوق كله في مناطق قيعان للتصحيح الحالي ،،، و الاتجاه الأساسي صاعد و أي هبوط هو عبارة عن تصحيح يتبعه صعود يتجاوز القمة الي هبط منها
اليوم الصباح البتكوين اعطى اشارة انعكاس من عاداته و هي كسر كاذب لمنطقة دعم و من ثم ارتداد سريع و هذا الي حصل التنبيه على القاع كان واضح ، و كسر 82K يعني طيران للسوق كله 👍🔥
PAXG 🚨 الذهب مقابل البتكوين ،،، سلبي جدا و اعطى تصحيح صاعد خلال الأيام الماضية تمهيدا لاستكمال الهبوط هذا الشارت اثره عكسي بمعنى امامنا ارتداد محترم للبتكوين الى 85K و 87K باذن الله 🟢 و موجة شاملة لكل السوق انطلاقا من المناطق الحالية و العملات هي المستفيد الأكبر السوق كله في قاع 🫵
🚨🟢 السوق متماسك بشكل قوي فنيا بالرغم من كل السلبية الي عند المتداولين ،،، و العملات متماسكة اكثر من البتكوين و الإيثر !!! البيئة جاهزة لانطلاق موجة الصعود المرصودة من المنطقة الحالية ، و العملات راح يكون صعودها ممتاز 🟢👈 من هنا البتكوين جاهز لاختراق ال 87K ⏳️
جمعة مباركة على الجميع 🌹 الجميع اطلع على الأحداث بما يخص اختراق لمنصة Binance ،،، راح احدث السوق بشكل منفصل لكن هذه بعض النقاط الي لا خلاف عليها : 🟢 لا تشغل بالك ك مستخدم لأنه المنصة عندها كل الامكانيات انها تعوض كل الأضرار و لن يتأثر أي مستخدم ... ف ما فيه داعي للخوف ابدأ و منصة BINANCE ما هي سهله و عندها امكانيات ضخمة ، و هذا الحدث راح يعدّي مثل ما عدا غيره و السوق يتعداها خلال فترة بسيطه ولا كان شيء حصل 🟢 تفا…
🔄🔄 🟢 البتكوين حاليا ليس له خيار الا ال 90K بعدها الدببة و الثيران يجلسو على طاولة المفاوضات من جديد ...
اللهم صلِّ على سيدنا محمد و على آله و صحبه أجمعين صلو على رسول الله ❤️ اللهم أعز الإسلام و المسلمين في كل بقاع الأرض
🚨 اسمع التسجيل كامل 👆👍
Voice message, posted without a caption
سلوك البتكوين و هو في بول ماركت مهما تجي اخبار سلبيه اثرها لن يتعدى تصحيح عابر و يعاود الصعود في البيرماركت لو تنهال الاخبار الإيجابية من كل مكان لن يتعدى الصعود مجرد بامب و يرجع يهبط و حنا حاليا في سوق صاعد 👍 ال 90K أقرب من أي رقم هابط و العملات كلها جاهزة لموجتها 🌹
ONDO لاي شخص دخلها معي ، هدفنا منطقة 10/10 🟢 و هي بين 0.90 - 1.20 و عندها بحدثها ان شاء الله ، خلك متابع التحديثات اول باول 👍
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @lafichart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cryptomena1 · 102,981#1
@Adamkamal144 · 42,994#2
@Abod_Cryptocurrency · 11,331#3
@Cryp2me · 17,356#4
@crypto_currencyME · 100,625#5
@Ramooscrypto · 4,810#6
@abramchart · 24,715#7
@Wolf_Trader11 · 11,394#8
@CryptoArabic005 · 5,469#9
@abusalamachart · 10,912#10
@traderbrother0 · 7,581#11
@YD_Cryptocurrency · 13,228#12
@Mshary_chart0 · 3,740#13
@EATrading1 · 251,585#14
@cr_halal · 106,034#15
@talbalel · 18,014#16
@assadrizqmoneyteam · 58,991#17
@Mfanni · 18,857#18
@crypto_News24_Z · 28,832#19
@limarcurrencies · 4,331#20
@ahmadcharts · 15,864#21
@TradingAy · 4,357#22
@KadiXpr0 · 2,514#23
@shimaa_Feactal_Vip · 16,911#24
@shimaa_Crypto1 · 29,200#25
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 59,785#26
@BilalCryptoCharts · 3,234#27
@scalping_Signalss · 24,258#28
@Omar_Crypto · 6,339#29
@MrMooChart · 3,989#30
@fxbalA · 21,380#31
@cryptochini_cafe · 4,286#32
@scalping_Midd · 18,522#33
@OfficialZcrypto · 11,060#34
@F_35cu · 110#35
@Private_Traders_Club · 2,842#36
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,752#37
@chart800 · 2,919#38
@cryptobadr · 103,090#39
@MKMALYVIP · 18,861#40
@Crypto_Trend_11 · 3,502#41
@mrcryptoyyt · 35,754#42
@theeasycrypto · 8,485#43
@CrypoIslam · 48,001#44
@Apollobot7 · 5,299#45
@abu_saooud_chart · 2,123#46
@multimcg · 3,711#47
@arabspunks · 1,763#48
@mahmoud_20n · 1,249#49
@badwicrypto · 8,094#50
@Sinjar2024 · 36,580#51
@Shimma_Magic · 7,904#52
@bofahadtrader · 2,395#53
@Hamam74 · 47,666#54
@AlfarsiCryptoch · 1,288#55
@muneer_gove · 2,380#56
@llll963 · 6,529#57
@LXInsights · 6,157#58
@caesartrading · 4,275#59
@Cryptocurrencyy9 · 67,854#60
@vacahsb1825 · 16,065#61
@crypto1kingdom · 7,768#62
@TraderPro2420 · 614#63
@AHMED25CRYPTO · 9,009#64
@TIGERCRP · 1,202#65
@Learn_With_Shaimmaa · 11,573#66
@arabcharts · 5,246#67
@cryptomax801 · 3,989#68
@Whale200 · 11,047#69
@fox_crypto1 · 2,274#70
@Fractal_Hatem · 4,140#71
@ForexBreakingNews · 369,354#72
@BooooooooMmmmmmmmm · 6,614#73
@AlsaqaehMain · 9,634#74
@inv7mind · 21,636#75
@protrading36 · 29,518#76
@CRYPTO_TO_HOLD · 15,582#77
@cryptoossi · 1,716#78
@the_future_111 · 41,255#79
@scienceweb1 · 16,311#80
@khalidkuw · 3,057#81
@Mamdouh_Zaki_Trading · 4,487#82
@businessma7room · 46,510#83
@yousefbtc · 6,241#84
@crypto2342dssrexcxc · 4,877#85
@Pablo_Crypto_01 · 749#86
@Hamamm74 · 4,624#87
@btcalarabs · 18,607#88
@himaih · 19,284#89
@cryptonews3111 · 10,472#90
@leacked_coursesVIP · 45,889#91
@Kwarezp2p · 5,137#92
@dogs · 6,475,477#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Adamkamal144 · 42,994
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptomena1 · 102,981
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_q88 · 23,970
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
@F_35cu · 110
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
@Mfanni · 18,857
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
@fxbalA · 21,380
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
@abramchart · 24,715
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
@the_future_111 · 41,255
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptobadr · 103,090
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@assadrizqmoneyteam · 58,991
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@cr_halal · 106,034
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@btcalarabs · 18,607
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
@MKMALYVIP · 18,861
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
@EATrading1 · 251,585
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,445
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@EACoinTalk · 26,821
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
@Hamam74 · 47,666
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@crypto_currencyME · 100,625
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@goldenwhale3100 · 18,116
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 October 2026
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 59,785
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@mehmetwehbe · 69,521
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@shimaa_Crypto1 · 29,200
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
@EMARATI_ae · 18,712
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
@MrAmwal · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAFI CHART” (@lafichart), 34,541 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lafichart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.