🚨 سؤال: ما هي المرحلة التي نمر بها حاليًا في دورة سوق العملات الرقمية؟
🔥85

Channel
@cryptobadr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
142,420subscribers
+39,513 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001476105577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptobadr |
| Description | • مجتمع تعليم | تحليل فني | صفقات | مضاربة | توصيات | عملات رقمية | إدارة محفظة | خدمات #BTC ـ crypto | cryptocurrency • للتنسيق والإعلان @CryptoFaneer • للشكاوى والاقتراحات @Meana2024 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptobadr |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 142,420 | +5,213 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 137,207 | +30,289 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 106,918 | +26 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 106,892 | -519 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 107,411 | -618 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 108,029 | -973 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 109,002 | -706 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 109,708 | +1,821 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 107,887 | +11,708 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 96,179 | -548 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 96,727 | -859 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 97,586 | -3,066 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 100,652 | -2,133 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 102,785 | -122 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 102,907 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (2 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 565,910 |
| Reactions total | 17,348 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
17,348 reactions across 68 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 5,286 | 30.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,592 | 9.18% | |
| 🎉 | 1,551 | 8.94% | |
| 👍 | 1,550 | 8.93% | |
| 💯 | 1,535 | 8.85% | |
| 🤩 | 1,493 | 8.61% | |
| 🥰 | 1,435 | 8.27% | |
| 😍 | 1,415 | 8.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,413 | 8.15% | |
| 🤝 | 26 | 0.15% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 0.144% | |
| 😘 | 18 | 0.104% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.023% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.017% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.012% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,348reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 سؤال: ما هي المرحلة التي نمر بها حاليًا في دورة سوق العملات الرقمية؟
🔥85
🚨 رئيس CFTC: إذا استمر تعطيل CLARITY Act سنتحرك بأنفسنا لتنظيم الكريبتو! 🇺🇸🔥 قال Mike Selig إن استمرار تعثر CLARITY Act بسبب ما وصفه بـ عرقلة الديمقراطيين سيدفع هيئة CFTC إلى استخدام صلاحياتها الحالية لبناء إطار تنظيمي لأسواق الأصول الرقمية. وقال Selig: "إذا استمر تعثر CLARITY بسبب عرقلة الديمقراطيين، ستستخدم CFTC صلاحياتها الحالية للبدء في إنشاء نظام تنظيمي لأسواق أصول الكريبتو."
🔥81
🚨مانترا MANTRA_Chain تنهار 18% بعد توقف الشبكة بالكامل! ⚠️ تراجعت MANTRA بنحو 18% بعد أن أوقفت الشبكة جميع المعاملات بسبب حادث لم يتم الكشف عن تفاصيله حتى الآن. وقام الفريق المسؤول عن شبكة الـL1 المتخصصة في الأصول الحقيقية المرمّزة RWA بتجميد عدة أجزاء من البنية التحتية، تشمل: 🔻 المعاملات على الشبكة 🔻 الـValidators 🔻 عمليات الإيداع والسحب 🔻 بعض نقاط الاتصال Endpoints
🔥68🥰12💯11🤩10👍9😍9❤7🎉7
🔴الذهب: فرص الصعود تبدو أقوى مع دخول الأسبوع المقبل – TD Securities ⬅️أشار محللا TD Securities، رايان ماكاي وبارت ميليك، إلى أن الذهب والمعادن الثمينة بشكل عام تتداول ضمن نطاق سعري أعلى، وهو ما قد يؤدي إلى موجة جديدة من عمليات الشراء من مستشاري تداول السلع (CTA). 📈 وهذا يعزز احتمالات استمرار الزخم الصعودي للذهب خلال الأسبوع المقبل.
🔥68❤21🎉20💯20❤🔥18😍15🥰14🤩12
🚨 ضربة قوية جدًا للكريبتو! مستشار الكريبتو في البيت الأبيض Patrick Witt يقول إن أكبر عقبة أمام قانون CLARITY تم حلّها والأخطر أكثر من 30 تريليون دولار من رأس المال قد تكون جاهزة للدخول إلى سوق الكريبتو! إذا مرّ القانون… ممكن نشوف موجة سيولة تاريخية تدخل السوق واضح إن القادم مو عادي أبداً…
🔥85🤩14❤13🥰12💯11🎉9😍9👍6
🔥 متفائل: يقول ماثيو سيجل من شركة فان إيك إنه لا يزال يتوقع أن يصل سعر البيتكوين إلى 100 ألف دولار العام المقبل، وقد يصل إلى 500 ألف دولار بحلول عام 2029 إذا سارت الدورة كالمعتاد.
🔥82🤝2😘2👀1
🚨 الاختراق الحقيقي أم الاختراق الكاذب؟ مو كل كسر لمستوى مهم يعني بداية حركة قوية… أحياناً السوق يعمل اختراق وهمي ليجذب المتداولين ثم يعكس الاتجاه. كيف تميّز بينهم؟ 👇 ✅ الاختراق الحقيقي: إغلاق الشمعة فوق مستوى المقاومة أو تحت الدعم وجود زخم قوي وحجم تداول واضح استمرار السعر بعد الاختراق وعدم العودة مباشرة للمنطقة إعادة اختبار المستوى والارتداد منه ❌ الاختراق الكاذب: كسر المستوى بظل الشمعة فقط دخول السعر ثم العودة ب…
🔥93🎉34🥰23👍20💯20😍19❤18❤🔥15
🚨 أكثر من 3 مليارات دولار تصفيات للشورت مع وصول البيتكوين إلى 72 ألف دولار! 🔥₿ أدى الصعود القوي للبيتكوين ووصوله إلى مستوى 72,000 دولار إلى موجة ضخمة من تصفية مراكز Short خلال آخر 24 ساعة. 💥 أكثر من 3 مليارات دولار من مراكز الشورت تمت تصفيتها مع اندفاع السعر للأعلى، في واحدة من أقوى موجات الـShort Squeeze الأخيرة. المتداولون الذين راهنوا على استمرار الهبوط وجدوا أنفسهم أمام ارتفاع سريع أجبر المنصات على إغلاق المرا…
🔥71🤩24😍24❤23🎉23👍21💯21🥰20
🔵إليكم أبرز التطورات الحاصلة 🔷الذهب يتعرض لجني أرباح بعد وصوله لأعلى مستوى في أكثر من شهرين. 🔷 خطوة مفاجئة من الخزانة الأمريكية لدعم سيولة سوق السندات ضغطت على العوائد وأضعفت الدولار، ما يبقي الذهب مدعومًا. 🔷 الدولار يتحرك قرب أدنى مستوياته في 3 أشهر، وهو عامل إيجابي للمعدن الأصفر. 🔷 الفضة تحافظ على تداولاتها قرب 67 دولارًا للأونصة. ⬅️الذهب يصحح بعد موجة صعود قوية، لكن ضعف الدولار وتراجع عوائد السندات قد يجعلان…
🔥81🎉45🥰35👍28💯28❤🔥25❤24🤩21
🚨 اختراق Maya Protocol وخسائر تقدر بنحو 1.7 مليون دولار! ⚠️ أكد مؤسس Maya Protocol، AaluxxMyth، تعرض البروتوكول لعملية استغلال أمني Exploit أدت إلى خسائر تقدر بنحو 1.7 مليون دولار. وبحسب شركة الأمن CertiK، تمكن المهاجم من سحب أصول من السيولة المشتركة للبروتوكول شملت: 🔻 نحو 48.87 مليون CACAO 🔻 نحو 98.82 LINK ويعيد الحادث تسليط الضوء على مخاطر الثغرات في بروتوكولات DeFi والسيولة المشتركة، حيث يمكن لثغرة واحدة أن تس…
🔥85🤩36💯35🎉30😍30👍27❤25❤🔥23
📊 تحليل: أظهر استطلاع رأي أجرته رويترز أن 63% من الأمريكيين يرون أن استفادة ترامب من العملات الرقمية منذ عودته إلى منصبه أمر "غير لائق".
🔥98💯29❤🔥26🎉26😍26🥰23👍22❤16
🪙6️⃣6️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣
🔥61👍38💯35❤34🎉34😍31❤🔥26🤩21
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @cryptobadr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مجتمع العملات الموثوقة” (@cryptobadr), 142,420 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptobadr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.