Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for القناةُ العامةُ لطالبِ علمٍ - عملات رقميّة

Channel

القناةُ العامةُ لطالبِ علمٍ - عملات رقميّة

@talbalel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,014subscribers

-616 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001156677005
TypeChannel
Username@talbalel
Descriptionالتداول معركة نفسية.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2018 and 31 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/talbalel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,01418,63018,3227 August 2026 — 18,630 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,626 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,616 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,601 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,594 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,571 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,557 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,547 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,538 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,529 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,522 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,517 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,504 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,497 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,487 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,473 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,459 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,442 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,435 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,432 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,426 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,416 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,403 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,387 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,382 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,366 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,341 subscribers10 September 2026 — 18,312 subscribers12 September 2026 — 18,286 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,303 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,295 subscribers17 September 2026 — 18,287 subscribers28 September 2026 — 18,292 subscribers5 October 2026 — 18,229 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,208 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,183 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,180 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,163 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,159 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,186 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,181 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,179 subscribers21 October 2026 — 18,174 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,166 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,152 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,142 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,133 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,128 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,116 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,099 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,091 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,082 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,069 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,058 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,045 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,038 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,025 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,014 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -616. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,922–18,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 13:0518,014-11
4 Nov 2026, 14:1918,025-13
3 Nov 2026, 15:4018,038-7
2 Nov 2026, 14:1618,045-13
1 Nov 2026, 11:2718,058-11
31 Oct 2026, 09:3418,069-13
30 Oct 2026, 06:0818,082-9
29 Oct 2026, 09:1518,091-8
28 Oct 2026, 06:3018,099-17
27 Oct 2026, 06:2018,116-12
26 Oct 2026, 09:5018,128-5
25 Oct 2026, 08:2018,133-9
24 Oct 2026, 11:0418,142-10
23 Oct 2026, 07:4918,152-14
22 Oct 2026, 09:1118,166-8
21 Oct 2026, 03:5718,174-5
20 Oct 2026, 02:3818,179-2
19 Oct 2026, 04:5018,181-5
18 Oct 2026, 03:4718,186+27
17 Oct 2026, 03:1618,159first reading

Engagement

399 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.48%
avg views ÷ 18,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
37
of 399 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held399 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total54,990
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,000
Videos
≈76
Links
≈257

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (10.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 6 November 2026

فعلوها: ستحدث - إن شاء الله - وأظن أن العملة سيكون فيها فرصة كبيرة تفيد من يعزز ويشتري.

5 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 6 November 2026

JCT قد يحدث تلاعب فيها كبير جدا

5 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 6 November 2026

التعب يزول ويُنسى والنتائج تدوم وتبقى. والانشغال بالحال عن المآل ضعف عقل وسوء تفكير. ومن استعجل الشيء قبل أوانه عوقبة بحرمانه. ومن نظر في نقص البدايات حُرم من كمال النهايات والنسبيّة ضياعٌ؛ لأن الحقيقة لا تتعدد.

3 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 6 November 2026

في هذا العام 2026 دخلت (بول ماركت كبير) ثلاث مرات ثم خرجت وقد حدث ذلك مع أكثر من عملة ومنهم AIN ثم صعدت... ويحدث ذلك لأسباب كثيرة: منها تلاعب ممن يملك أكثر كمية من العملة ويحتاج إلى أسعار منخفضة ليكون لديه متوسط سعري مميز. والآخر : أن يفشل المشروع أو يحدث له خبر سيء يغير اتجاه العملة الصعودي. وهذان أشهر سبين يحدثان للعملات.

Showing the 12 most recent of 399 posts we hold for @talbalel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@talbalel edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTCAnonymous Poll268 voters

هل الكلام في القناة عن السوق مفهوم؟

  1. نعم59%
  2. لا11%
  3. أفهم بعضه.32%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Poll314 voters

أفكر أن تكون الصفقات فقط للعملات التي تدخل بول ماركت مع تحديث ما نشر من الصفقات. فما رأيكم؟

  1. نعم84%
  2. لا17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 399 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

المنظور الفني
@Mfanni · 18,857
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
The Future
@the_future_111 · 41,255
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
مجتمع العملات الموثوقة
@cryptobadr · 103,090
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
f35cu
@F_35cu · 110
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
المجتمع الرقمي
@fxbalA · 21,380
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
LAFI CHART
@lafichart · 34,541
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
بيتكوين العرب لشراء و بيع العملات الرقمية
@btcalarabs · 18,607
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
NaiF CHarT
@cryptomena1 · 102,981
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
🎓crypto_q8 -العملات الرقمية🎓
@crypto_q88 · 23,970
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
CRYPTOHALAL كريبتو حلال
@cr_halal · 106,034
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
أكاديمية كريبتو حلال
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,445
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
قناة حوت العملات الرسمية
@MKMALYVIP · 18,849
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
صنع ستيكرات ملصقات مميزة
@msajjes · 16,764
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 21 September 2026
Adam kamal
@Adamkamal144 · 42,994
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
3M - أحكام العملات
@A7kem · 24,335
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
AbramChart
@abramchart · 24,715
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
Dr. Assad Rizq | غرفة العمليات
@assadrizqmoneyteam · 58,991
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
SPL
@SPL_3G · 147,545
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Nuclear
@shimaa_Crypto1 · 29,200
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
🌹 ربح التراكميScalp~ سبوت 🌹#bingx
@scalping_Signalss · 24,258
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
#وظائف_هندسية
@atalla3 · 44,442
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐁𝐀𝐍 𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎
@crypto_currencyME · 100,625
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
(👷‍♂️وظائف هندسية و فنية 👷‍♀️)
@Engineers_Jobs · 58,512
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Hammam | كريبتو همام
@Hamam74 · 47,666
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“القناةُ العامةُ لطالبِ علمٍ - عملات رقميّة” (@talbalel), 18,014 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talbalel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.