فعلوها: ستحدث - إن شاء الله - وأظن أن العملة سيكون فيها فرصة كبيرة تفيد من يعزز ويشتري.

Channel
القناةُ العامةُ لطالبِ علمٍ - عملات رقميّة
@talbalel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,014subscribers
-616 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001156677005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @talbalel |
| Description | التداول معركة نفسية. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2018 and 31 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/talbalel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 18,014 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:19 | 18,025 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:40 | 18,038 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 18,045 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:27 | 18,058 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:34 | 18,069 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:08 | 18,082 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 18,091 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 18,099 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:20 | 18,116 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:50 | 18,128 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 18,133 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:04 | 18,142 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 18,152 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:11 | 18,166 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 18,174 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 18,179 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 18,181 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 18,186 | +27 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 18,159 | first reading |
Engagement
399 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.48%
- avg views ÷ 18,014 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,530
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 399 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 399 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 54,990 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,000
- Videos
- ≈76
- Links
- ≈257
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (10.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
0.05 الآن.📈
JCT قد يحدث تلاعب فيها كبير جدا
التعب يزول ويُنسى والنتائج تدوم وتبقى. والانشغال بالحال عن المآل ضعف عقل وسوء تفكير. ومن استعجل الشيء قبل أوانه عوقبة بحرمانه. ومن نظر في نقص البدايات حُرم من كمال النهايات والنسبيّة ضياعٌ؛ لأن الحقيقة لا تتعدد.
العرض يُغلق اليوم مساءً⏳
🟢 EPIC: 0.073 جيدة للتعزيز
صبحكم الله بالخير.
السوق✅
ما زالت في بول ماركت كبير...
.📈
XMR: 631 الآن📈
في هذا العام 2026 دخلت (بول ماركت كبير) ثلاث مرات ثم خرجت وقد حدث ذلك مع أكثر من عملة ومنهم AIN ثم صعدت... ويحدث ذلك لأسباب كثيرة: منها تلاعب ممن يملك أكثر كمية من العملة ويحتاج إلى أسعار منخفضة ليكون لديه متوسط سعري مميز. والآخر : أن يفشل المشروع أو يحدث له خبر سيء يغير اتجاه العملة الصعودي. وهذان أشهر سبين يحدثان للعملات.
Showing the 12 most recent of 399 posts we hold for @talbalel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@talbalel edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل الكلام في القناة عن السوق مفهوم؟
- نعم59%
- لا11%
- أفهم بعضه.32%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
أفكر أن تكون الصفقات فقط للعملات التي تدخل بول ماركت مع تحديث ما نشر من الصفقات. فما رأيكم؟
- نعم84%
- لا17%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 399 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Mfanni · 18,857
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
@the_future_111 · 41,255
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
@cryptobadr · 103,090
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@F_35cu · 110
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
@fxbalA · 21,380
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
@lafichart · 34,541
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@btcalarabs · 18,607
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
@cryptomena1 · 102,981
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto_q88 · 23,970
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
@cr_halal · 106,034
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,445
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@MKMALYVIP · 18,849
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
@msajjes · 16,764
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 21 September 2026
@Adamkamal144 · 42,994
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
@A7kem · 24,335
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
@abramchart · 24,715
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
@assadrizqmoneyteam · 58,991
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@SPL_3G · 147,545
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
@shimaa_Crypto1 · 29,200
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
@scalping_Signalss · 24,258
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
@atalla3 · 44,442
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@crypto_currencyME · 100,625
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@Engineers_Jobs · 58,512
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@Hamam74 · 47,666
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“القناةُ العامةُ لطالبِ علمٍ - عملات رقميّة” (@talbalel), 18,014 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/talbalel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.